Amazon Vehicles Editors' Picks Amazon Fashion Learn more nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Britney Spears Fire TV Stick Health, Household and Grocery Back to School Totes Summer-Event-Garden Amazon Cash Back Offer TheKicks TheKicks TheKicks  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis Celine Dion Shop Now
Customer Discussions > History forum

Ending Slavery Through War


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 10 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Dec 10, 2010 10:05:38 PM PST
My own perspective is that only defensive war is justifiable, ala Switzerland. But what if a neighboring nation is committing horrendous crimes? For example allowing slavery?

The North outlawed slavery in the South through invasion and conquest.

Japan outlawed slavery in Korea, Taiwan, and Manchuria through invasion and conquest.

China outlawed slavery in Tibet through invasion and conquest.

Great Britain outlawed slavery in many parts of its empire through invasion and conquest.

Ignoring the fact that ending slavery was not the initial goal of any of these invasions, can ending slavery justify war?

America's Forgotten History, Part 1: Foundations
America's Forgotten History, Part 2: Rupture

Posted on Dec 10, 2010 10:49:52 PM PST
dss says:
Not if it wasn't the initial goal.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 10, 2010 11:24:27 PM PST
John M. Lane says:
Slavery is legal in parts of Islam and the Prophet himself inherited a caravan business from his first wife's family which transported slaves taken in Africa. Should Islam be added to your list of entities "committing horrendous crimes?"

Posted on Dec 11, 2010 11:05:08 AM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Feb 1, 2011 1:07:16 PM PST]

Posted on Dec 11, 2010 11:11:39 AM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Feb 1, 2011 1:07:16 PM PST]

Posted on Dec 11, 2010 12:35:33 PM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Jul 18, 2011 12:05:00 PM PDT]

Posted on Dec 11, 2010 4:32:46 PM PST
JOHN LANE: Should Islam be added to your list of entities "committing horrendous crimes?"

MARK L: Of course. In fact, come to think of it, I can't really come up with a significant part of the world which did not commit horrendous crimes. Which is kind of the point, here. If countries should have the right to invade other countries for horrendous crimes, we would have to be engaged in never-ending warfare with most of the world. Come to think of it, that's kind of the situation we've gotten ourselves into, isn't it?

Actually, though, I'm not sure if Islamic entities would fit the original list. I listed major examples of where one country invaded and conquered another and then ended slavery in the conquered country. Can't think of any examples off hand where that happened in Islamic countries.

Posted on Dec 11, 2010 4:38:04 PM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Jul 18, 2011 12:05:00 PM PDT]

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 13, 2010 11:00:46 AM PST
[Deleted by Amazon on Mar 9, 2011 7:23:13 AM PST]

Posted on Dec 13, 2010 4:15:12 PM PST
War is not appropriate to combat slavery. Slavery dies hard and re-appears in different forms through time. That's because it's more than a single institution. Societies develop from the equality of huntergatherers to organized social stratification, inequality. Human civilization always results in wealth and power differentials. Disparities in political, legal, financial and military power allow the strong to dominate or enslave the weak through various means and for different reasons.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the History forum

 

This discussion

Discussion in:  History forum
Participants:  7
Total posts:  10
Initial post:  Dec 10, 2010
Latest post:  Dec 13, 2010

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers

Search Customer Discussions