Industrial Deals Beauty MagazinestoInspire STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc PCB for Musical Instruments Starting at $39.99 Grocery Handmade Wedding Rustic Decor Home Gift Guide Off to College Home Gift Guide Book House Cleaning britboxlaunch britboxlaunch britboxlaunch  Amazon Echo now $99.99 Limited-time offer: All-New Fire HD 8, starting at $59.99 Kindle Paperwhite Trade it in. Fund the next. Tailgating STEMClubToys17_gno
Customer Discussions > Michael Jackson forum

Smoke Without Fire: The Untold Story Behind the Michael Jackson Trial


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-11 of 11 posts in this discussion
Posted on Jan 7, 2012, 9:31:31 PM PST
Martha says:
Thanks for the jokes, Dial. Some of them are simply priceless. :)

"All the creative projects Michael may have conceived and had to put away waiting for a time when he would be received in public and on the stage without bursts of hostility. All the music, the performances and films we can only imagined forever canceled due to what was truly sheer stupidity."

Isn't that the truth! :(

Posted on Jan 7, 2012, 4:13:13 PM PST
nikki98 says:
This blog is really well done - very professional

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 7, 2012, 3:04:46 PM PST
Sarah Jax says:
Teeee heeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!
ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted on Jan 7, 2012, 10:11:59 AM PST
Dialdancer says:
Patricia,

I read your email question. The answer is too many, far too many Sneddon's. Far too many willing create a case while letting the real crooks walk. Far too much using personal prejudices to decide who is guilty and who is not. Far too many who become judges or end up working for the DOJ or Attny Gen's Office. Far too many who are not brought to justice themselves and ends up receiving a golden handshake for their wrongdoing at retirement.

That is why I like the "Smoke Without Fire" site it explorers all the facets of investigative/trial wrong doing against Michael using current situations and regular people.

Posted on Jan 7, 2012, 9:47:17 AM PST
Dialdancer says:
I was in discussion about the evidence and information concerning the 2005 trial. I was forwarding information concerning Janet's pre-trial testimony where she is trying to explain why she should be looking for an attorney to sue MJ a year before meeting him and kept hearing "Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a new attorney?", and I'd visualize Sneddon and began laughing.

I am glad you enjoyed. A little laughter helps balance out the anger which comes with advocating for Michael.

All the creative projects Michael may have conceived and had to put away waiting for a time when he would be received in public and on the stage without bursts of hostility. All the music, the performances and films we can only imagined forever canceled due to what was truly sheer stupidity.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 7, 2012, 4:15:37 AM PST
nikki98 says:
Hilarious Dial!!!

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 6, 2012, 8:15:55 PM PST
Thanks, Dial...I really needed a laugh after reading about the Rickey Wyatt case. Did you get my email?

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 6, 2012, 8:09:34 PM PST
no name says:
THANKS, Dial~~
LMAO!!!!!!
The best I've read in a Long time!!!!!

Posted on Jan 6, 2012, 7:50:37 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Jan 6, 2012, 7:52:19 PM PST
Dialdancer says:
I don't intend to hijack this thread, but the title and the fact I was researching the wrongfully accused and convicted cause me to find something interesting. For anyone who has read Janet Arvizo's testimony and found themselves laughing against their will. If you thought SD answers on the witness stand were idiotic then you may find the below funny.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts, and are
things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now
published by court reporters that had the torment of staying calm while
these exchanges were actually taking place.

ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.

ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.

ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you
forgot?

ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.

ATTORNEY: Now doctor, "isn't it true that when a person dies in his
sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?"
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?

ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: He's twenty, much like your IQ.

ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you s.h.i.t.t.i.n.g me? (amazon objected)

ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Getting laid

ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I get a
new attorney?

ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Take a guess..

ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS: Unless the Circus was in town I'm going with male.

ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition
notice, which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.

ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead
people?
WITNESS: All of them. The live ones put up too much of a fight.

ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go
to?
WITNESS: Oral.

ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And, Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: If not, he was by the time I finished.

ATTORNEY:Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Are you qualified to ask that question?

And the best for last:

ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a
pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you
began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: I see, but could the patient have still been alive,
nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and
practicing law...

Posted on Jan 5, 2012, 3:15:47 PM PST
Dialdancer says:
Thank you for this. I was downloading info from a site concerning cases of wrongfully accused and wrongfully convictions when told of this new thread. Perfect timing.

Fresh eyes on available material. Nicely constructed site, well arranged information.

Initial post: Jan 5, 2012, 1:13:26 PM PST
LFZ says:
A well researched blog.

http://smokewithoutfiremichaeljackson.wordpress.com/
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the Michael Jackson forum

 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Michael Jackson forum
Participants:  7
Total posts:  11
Initial post:  Jan 5, 2012
Latest post:  Jan 7, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers