Industrial Deals Beauty STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Starting at $39.99 Grocery Handmade Wedding Rustic Decor Home Gift Guide Off to College Home Gift Guide Book House Cleaning TheTick TheTick TheTick  Amazon Echo now $99.99 Limited-time offer: All-New Fire 7, starting at $39.99 Kindle Paperwhite AutoRip in CDs & Vinyl Tailgating STEMClubToys17_gno
Customer Discussions > Politics forum

What do you think of Obama now?

This discussion has reached the maximum length permitted, and cannot accept new replies. Start a new discussion

Discussion moved to this forum by Amazon on Nov 19, 2011, 6:11:41 PM PST.


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 6926-6950 of 1000 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on May 15, 2012, 2:42:28 PM PDT
M. Daniel says:
"The reason it came into play for Nixon was he rigged an election."

Nixon did not rig an election---he had no need to. He won 49 states.

Posted on May 16, 2012, 12:44:12 PM PDT
Bookgirl says:
Horrible excuse for president.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 12:16:14 PM PDT
And the Impeachment proceedings were just the delusion of millions of Americans...

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 12:26:44 PM PDT
A customer says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 12:27:06 PM PDT
KING CONAN says:
How about the New Impeachment @
HCR-107........?

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 12:31:59 PM PDT
By who? McRomney? Nope.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 12:55:25 PM PDT
A customer says:
Lefty, I am thinking a 49 State shellacking. I am giving Barry Hussein Obama Hawaii.

Happy Days are ahead!!

Posted on May 17, 2012, 2:45:31 PM PDT
KING CONAN says:
When you want to "Sneak One Through",
You do it before a Holiday, Like Dec 31st?

Military Detention Law Blocked by New York Judge - Bloomberg

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-16/military-detention-law-blocked-by-new-york-judge.html

"SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL SHERIFF"

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 3:47:49 PM PDT
Actually most projections have him him ahead by quite a bit.
Romney does not have the charisma of Reagan, but Obama does.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 5:03:23 PM PDT
Fox news as of 5/15 gave Obama a 46% to 39% advantage. The RCP Poll of Polls has Obama up 46.1% to 43.7%. Rasmussen is one of the minority that gives a slight edge to Romney of 46% to 45%. So what's this about a 49 state landslide for Romney? Methinks I caught you in yet another lie. Are you sure you aren't really a sock puppet for Stephen Colbert--your posts are simply outrageously over the top and do a disservice to the Conservative cause. Keep it up!

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 5:09:20 PM PDT
Then you are thinking wrong (as usual). No WAY California goes Twit Romney.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 5:55:10 PM PDT
Romney just doesn't have charisma, he is unlikeable. He is no Reagan.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 5:59:34 PM PDT
Nat says:
If even Fox can't hide it, that saying something.

Posted on May 17, 2012, 6:16:03 PM PDT
When he leaves the White House he'll take over as the new host of The Price is Right.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 6:37:28 PM PDT
Nat says:
The fact that impeachments cannot happen over hypothetical situations not yet acted upon deserves no attention.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 7:12:23 PM PDT
KING CONAN says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on May 17, 2012, 7:37:36 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 17, 2012, 7:46:37 PM PDT
KING CONAN says:
HOW FRIGGIN LOW CAN YOU GET!!!

Campaign Ads on
Dead President's bones.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/16/white-house-under-fire-for-adding-obama-policy-plugs-to-past-presidents-bios/

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 8:30:20 PM PDT
M. Daniel says:
Righty Leftkowicz says:"And the Impeachment proceedings were just the delusion of millions of Americans..."

They was based on a cover-up of the Watergate break-in. They were trying to dig up dirt but they did not need to rig anything since they had no chance of losing. The break-in probably occurred because they had so much money they had to think up stuff to spend it on. Impeachment proceedings never got to the floor of the House.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 8:33:15 PM PDT
M. Daniel says:
Nat says: "The fact that impeachments cannot happen over hypothetical situations not yet acted upon deserves no attention."

It is extremely unlikely but it is not true that it "cannot happen." An impeachment is anything a majority of the House is willing to vote for.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 9:44:29 PM PDT
Not really, they have to have a basis, they can't impeach over a parking ticket for example.

Article II: Section 4.
"The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 10:41:48 PM PDT
A customer says:
"Romney does not have the charisma of Reagan, but Obama does"

And Barry Hussein Obama has the worst economical record of any President, EVER.

I don't care if he is the biggest star in Hollywood, the folks want good paying jobs & a growing economy. Barry had his chance, he let Nancy Pelosi run things, because Barry had no clue how to run a government, let alone a business.

Barry lied his way in to the WH & will still be looking for someone to blame for HIS failures on his way OUT.

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 10:43:37 PM PDT
A customer says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 17, 2012, 10:46:15 PM PDT
A customer says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012, 3:20:04 AM PDT
Not really, Hoover had a worse economic record.
Reagan had higher unemployment.
You really don't know anything about history, do you?

In reply to an earlier post on May 18, 2012, 3:20:56 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 18, 2012, 5:46:35 AM PDT
Likability is important to how people vote.
If someone is boring and stiff they are less likely to vote for them.

(Edited for grammar.)
Discussion locked

Recent discussions in the Politics forum

  Discussion Replies Latest Post
Announcement
Amazon Discussions Feedback Forum
4508 22 hours ago
The inescapable fact 20 2 minutes ago
If it wasn't for a bunch of racist rural hillbillies living on their disability checks, there would be no Confederate statutes or "President" Trump. 89 6 minutes ago
Staying on topic 881 11 minutes ago
Is nobody going to mention that KKK rally, I mean White Nationalist rally held in N.C.? 1474 25 minutes ago
On August 21, 2017, the NATIONAL ECLIPSE will trace a narrow path of totality across twelve U.S. states. 0 28 minutes ago
a thread for those who don't believe the 9/11 Official Version 388 30 minutes ago
More than 500 police officers will be ready to keep the peace at ‘Boston Free Speech’ rally 14 43 minutes ago
Exporting Democracy failed. Trickle down failed. Gay marriage failed. 7 47 minutes ago
Only the Democratic Party 60 1 hour ago
Donald Trump, national disgrace, is awake and tweeting again. 31 1 hour ago
All the News Anti-Israel Posters do not care to read or discuss 6073 1 hour ago
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Politics forum
Participants:  686
Total posts:  10000
Initial post:  Oct 15, 2011
Latest post:  Feb 16, 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 17 customers