I wish to present a challenge to the Intelligent Design supporters on this forum. Since clearly one of the biggest problems in discussions of the subject is the lack of clear definitions for the terms used, I propose (or more accurately challenge) proponents to do three things here in this forum.
1) provide a definition of the terms of intelligent design.
These terms that require a definition include (but may not be limited to) "irreducible complexity" and "design".
2) Provide a statement of the theory of intelligent design.
3) use the above statement to make a scientific prediction.
Quoting form external sources is legitimate as long as the link is provided, (ie, no plagiarizing). Expect the definitions, statement of the theory, and prediction(s) to be held to a scientific standard. For example, to meet my challenge a statement must follow the logical structure of a scientific theory. In short, if you want it to be treated as science, present as science.
Recent discussions in the Science forum
|spherical earth vs. flat earth||4718||3 minutes ago|
|Other Than A Potential Source Of Food Or A Place To Conquer Then Rule And/Or Exploint, What Does Earth And Human Beings Have That Could Possibly Attract A Species From Another World To Make Contact?||109||7 minutes ago|
|Archaeology Plus Other Fohrbidden Sciences.||1026||16 minutes ago|
|Why relativity and quantum physics will be obsolete?||8||2 hours ago|
|Fun clips Film and TV.||32||3 hours ago|
|Tesla deliveries, and lost money on every one!||465||4 hours ago|
|Global warming is the most serious problem of our generation, part 4 (reboot)||6927||4 hours ago|
|Why is it Ridiculously Hot?||222||5 hours ago|
|Readers have strong opinions about reproductive rights!||163||5 hours ago|
|I am the devil.||32||10 hours ago|
|Pushing beyond what is safe?||204||22 hours ago|
|Re-Thinking Nuclear Energy||243||1 day ago|