Customer Discussions > Science forum

# What if the Universe is recurrent and all the singularities are one?

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-12 of 12 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Aug 30, 2011, 11:12:48 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Aug 30, 2011, 11:13:43 PM PDT
Hoo-Zen!! says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion.]

Posted on Aug 30, 2011, 11:49:59 PM PDT
This isn't the philosophy forum. What experiment do you propose?

Posted on Aug 31, 2011, 11:12:13 PM PDT
Hoo-Zen!! says:
Good point. Count up the number of black holes and their mass and see if it comes to the mass of the Universe or some multiple/ factor. Plot the location of the black holes at the time of their origin and see if it forms a pattern, try to develop a recurrent formula for these locations.

Shazzam!!

Posted on Sep 5, 2011, 11:58:09 PM PDT
Hoo-Zen!! says:
Shazzam!!

Posted on Dec 16, 2012, 5:48:20 PM PST
Hoo-Zen!! says:
Still an interesting question. Shazzam!!

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 16, 2012, 6:26:35 PM PST
Customer says:
it's been done, there's nothing to it.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 17, 2012, 10:34:48 AM PST
The singularities don't actually exist. They are an artifact of the failure of the equations of general relativity in domains where quantum gravity is required.

Posted on Dec 26, 2012, 7:14:30 PM PST
Hoo-Zen!! says:
w413
no it hasn't been done and yes there is something to it. and don't contradict me!
a.f.
artifact smartifact.

In reply to an earlier post on Dec 27, 2012, 6:32:47 AM PST
You need a quantum theory of gravity to describe what's going on at the Planck scale. Since general relativity is a classical theory, its equations are not valid in this realm. The point of infinite energy density is not a real physical state, since it is a result of applying the equations of general relativity at the Planck scale, where they no longer apply.

Posted on Jan 2, 2013, 6:56:49 PM PST
Hoo-Zen!! says:
Dear a.p.

Read part of Prugovecki on Quantum Gravity based on compactness and integrability of physical functions - interesting but the principle not lucid enough - but on the plus side gets rid of "many worlds" replaces it with "lightening- many paths propagation". I've been reading "Space elastic and Impeding" which is a bit/ very "out there" but has some Neo-classical (Bohr atom) "takes" on particles as "twist and fold" topologies along which or in which light is trapped in torus/ tricky-tricky moebius strips. This could help explain why "matter drags time" ( as Stephen Hawking puts it), doesn't explain propagation or local motion of particles.

I also have an idea for a mechanism based on Heisenberg to explain a particle(light) becoming trapped and so appearing to be tracing out a moebius strip. Just haven't done the physics to see if it works.

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 3, 2013, 5:15:05 AM PST
Hoo - "Count up the number of black holes and their mass and see if it comes to the mass of the Universe "

How could the mass of a subset of things in the universe total the mass of the universe itself?

In reply to an earlier post on Jan 3, 2013, 6:37:04 AM PST
Many a bright idea has come to grief on the shoals of your last sentence.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]]
Prompts for sign-in

### Recent discussions in the Science forum

Discussion Replies Latest Post
92 1 hour ago
2833 2 hours ago
9969 4 hours ago
7 3 days ago
7 3 days ago
3 6 days ago
40 7 days ago
1 8 days ago
22 17 days ago
2 20 days ago
14 23 days ago
0 24 days ago

## This discussion

Discussion in:  Science forum
Participants:  5
Total posts:  12
Initial post:  Aug 30, 2011
Latest post:  Jan 3, 2013