Amazon Vehicles GoldBox Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it $5 Albums Fire TV Stick Happy Belly Snacks Totes Amazon Cash Back Offer ElvisandNixon ElvisandNixon ElvisandNixon  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis Florida Georgia Line Shop Now
Customer Discussions > Science forum

Is there a robot head on the moon...?

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 26-28 of 28 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Apr 2, 2012 10:10:24 AM PDT
roeselare says:

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 2, 2012 10:37:50 AM PDT
Lj3d says:
J. Westwind says: Let's face it, pictures can be enhanced to favor an argument for or against these 'discoveries'.
And if there really is a manufactured head on the Moon or a 'man-made' giant face on Mars, we will probably never know.

Lj3d: Technically this is true. So the next best thing to do is look at the evidence. Then motives etc. Put it through an investigative process just as one would a criminal case. Then judge it in the end. I have had an interest in spaceflight and astronomy dating back four decades or more and my conclusions thus far have been that these anomalies are the result of people who want to sell books, DVDs etc. The images being faked against these discoveries would call into question the scientific community worldwide who do research on aerology or climatology based in part on fine details in the images. Furthermore, one has to ask why NASA would allow the images to be published to begin with if they were going to have to doctor them. Because technically, NASA could easily have hidden the Face On Mars (FOM) for example, from the public and we would never have known of it.

In reply to an earlier post on Apr 2, 2012 10:43:44 AM PDT
Lj3d says:
The best known unusual feature to date has been the Face On Mars or FOM. Discovered in Viking orbiter imagery in 1976, it became famous when Richard Hoagland began suggesting it was a humanoid face built by ancient martians. He didn't bother waiting for higher resolution imagery to become available because he had books to sell. In 1998, new images of the FOM showed it to be what was known all along. It is simply a geological formation that resembles a face. But because of the ensuing hoagwash from 1976 to 98, the face has attained legendary and mythical status. The FOM itself covers roughly a square mile in area. Hoagland wasn't satisfied with just a face. One cannot sell a book on a face alone, unless its a supermodel. So Hoagland proceeded to claim othere features on mars were artificial constructs.
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in

Recent discussions in the Science forum

  Discussion Replies Latest Post
Science in Harmony with God 6975 5 minutes ago
Will Virgin Galactic ever get off the ground with paid flights? Would you sign up to go? 39 1 hour ago
Global warming is the most serious problem of our generation, part 4 (reboot) 6983 1 hour ago
Don't eat produce from any Portland school garden, officials warn 16 2 hours ago
Atheist Scientists and the Lunatic Infinite Multivers 9 2 hours ago
See that, they can soon stop burning all that filthy diesel fuel! Get more in operation? 1 2 hours ago
Archaeology Plus Other Fohrbidden Sciences. 1072 4 hours ago
ANOD4U2C. 72 6 hours ago
What Are The Prospects For A Quickly Developed Zika Virus Vaccine? 9 6 hours ago
Quantum entanglement and the Mars Rover 46 9 hours ago
spherical earth vs. flat earth 4822 9 hours ago
Donald Trump must be a quantum particle 2 10 hours ago

This discussion

Discussion in:  Science forum
Participants:  13
Total posts:  28
Initial post:  Dec 31, 2009
Latest post:  Apr 2, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer

Search Customer Discussions