We all know about the publisher drama and "bribes" and whatever the internet comes up with. But there is ONE thing that is persistent and is always present in video game reviews but big websites: The fact that the reviewer never bought the game in the first place.
As a consumer, I'd expect my $60 to be worth the purchase and get some quality entertainment from the game. On the other hand, the reviewer received a free copy of said game and probably never had big expectations from it, since they didn't spend a dime to buy it. They also never have buyers remorse, which is a common thing among gamers. They can give a game a huge score just because they can, and because they are reviewing a product they played for FREE.
Just my thoughts on the matter :)
Recent discussions in the Video Games forum
|Final Fantasy XIV summer DLC promo||44||1 minute ago|
|PlayStation 4 Hits 60 Million Units Shipped||16||6 minutes ago|
|Persona 5 Impressions||619||19 minutes ago|
|Here it is... The Official VGF Game of 2016 Game! Cast your votes!||3236||1 hour ago|
|Koei Tecmo Has Multiple Switch Exclusives Coming||1||1 hour ago|
|12 Games in 12 Months 2017 Edition||240||2 hours ago|
|‘Destiny 2’ Gameplay Reveal Stream To Be 8 Hours Long With PS4 Version Being Shown. PC Will Be Shown As Well.||4||2 hours ago|
|Microsoft’s Xbox gaming division generated $1.9 billion last quarter||35||2 hours ago|
|Twitch Prime Games||4||3 hours ago|
|Gamestop trade in||4||5 hours ago|
|Weekend Gaming! Into that lusty month of May!||22||9 hours ago|
|Console(s) you bought for 1 game?||121||12 hours ago|