The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900-1916 unknown Edition

_The Triumph of Conservativism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900 - 1916_, subtitled "A radically new interpretation of the Progressive Era which argues that business leaders, and not the reformers, inspired the era's legislation regulating business", published in 1963 by the Free Press, by economic historian Gabriel Kolko, is a radical new interpretation of the reforms of the Progressive Era which attempts to show that the leaders of big business and not the reformers sought to regulate business to counteract the effects of competition and economic decentralization and to achieve concentration and monopoly. Gabriel Kolko (1932 - ) is a leading historian who has made an extensive study and reinterpretation of economic regulation and American militarism and was frequently associated with the New Left. Kolko's claims challenge the conventional wisdom which see business leaders as promoters of laissez-faire economics, by arguing instead that business leaders sought to regulate business so as to concentrate their power and avoid competition. This behavior has been termed "corporatism", but Kolko defines it to be "political capitalism" in this work. This book will focus primarily on the role of such business leaders and the corporations in the furthering of their interests through the power of the state. In another work, _Railroads and Regulation: 1877 - 1916_ (1965), Kolko focuses on the situation with the railroad monopolies so that is left out of this work. Kolko maintains that progressivism rather than being a fundamental movement for reform was actually a conservative movement aimed at furthering the goals of big business and for this reason he refers to the triumph of regulation as the "triumph of conservativism" and the "triumph of political capitalism". This book remains important for what it shows about the true nature of regulation and who really desires it. It can be seen that through regulation the corporations and monopolies are able to stifle competition and in that manner assure their continuing dominance.

In his "Introduction" to this book, Kolko lays out his fundamental themes explaining that this is not a book about "what might have been" but rather a book about what really did happen. Kolko explains his understanding of "progressivism" which he defines as "a movement for the political rationalization of business and industrial conditions, a movement that operated on the assumption that the general welfare of the community could be best served by satisifying the concrete needs of business." Kolko explains how business interests sought to achieve control over politics in order to achieve their goal of "political capitalism" (which Kolko defines as "the utilization of political outlets to attain conditions of stability, predictability, and security - to attain rationalization - in the economy"). Kolko explains how business interests sought the intervention of the federal government in business and the return of the Hamiltonian unity of politics and economics. Kolko remarks on the theories of Karl Marx noting that both Marx and Weber (as opposed to "Marxists") both noted that the central development of the economic trend of capitalism was towards centralization. Chapter One is entitled "Monopolies and Mergers: Predictions and Promises". Kolko explains how his interpretation differs from that of most historians (including many conservative historians) who see concentration of economic power as an inevitable result of the growth of capitalism and industrialism. Kolko explains how the monopoly was seen as "inevitable" ("The Inevitable Monopoly") and shows how men such as John D. Rockefeller came to argue that. Kolko also considers "Mergers and Promoters" noting how many argued that monopoly led to greater efficiency. Chapter Two is entitled "Competition and Decentralization: The Failure to Rationalize Industry". Kolko explains how the first decades of last century involved intense competition, however this competition resulted in a failure to rationalize industry and many industrialists found that overcentralization was less efficient. Kolko points out cases of this in "The Iron and Steel Industry", "The Oil Industry", "The Automobile Industry", "The Agricultural Machinery Industry", "The Telephone Industry", "The Copper Industry", and "The Meat Packing Industry". Chapter Three is entitled "Theodore Roosevelt and the Foundations of Political Capitalism, 1901 - 1904" which shows how the efforts of Morgan to rationalize and stabilize industries were leading to failure which resulted in the call for antitrust legislation from Roosevelt. Kolko considers the use of Social Darwinism by prominent conservative intellectuals and professors as a justification for laissez-faire, but shows how ultimately big business was to lead the move towards regulation. Kolko also shows how with various reform movements such as the Grangers, Populists, and trade unionists, change seemed inevitable. Kolko considers such topics as "The Antitrust Legacy" (of Theodore Roosevelt and the Sherman Antitrust Act), "A New President" (mentioning various aspects of Roosevelt's presidency), and "The Executive and Business". Chapter Four is entitled "Roosevelt as Reformer: 1904 - 1906" and considers the case of Roosevelt as reformer mentioning such topics as "Roosevelt as Reformer", "Insurance and Regulation", "Meat Inspection: Theory and Reality" (explaining the role of the muckrakers and Upton Sinclaire). Chapter Five is entitled "Roosevelt and Big Business: 1906 - 1908" and explains the role of Roosevelt and his relationship with big business mentioning such topics as "The Good Trusts" and "The Evil Trusts" (and the false dichotomy between them), "The Rule of Reason", and "The Attempt at Political Consolidation". Chapter Six is entitled "The Failure of Finance Capitalism: 1890 - 1908" and explains the failure of finance capitalism and the call for banking reform mentioning in particular the Morgan interests. This chapter includes topics discussing "Banking Reform Movements: 1893 - 1903" (mentioning the role of "Bryanism" and silver), "Roosevelt and Banking Reform", and "The Panic of 1907" (which led to the Aldrich Bill). Chapter Seven is entitled "The Ordeal of William Howard Taft: 1909 - 1911" explaining how William Howard Taft took up the legacy of Roosevelt. This chapter includes topics discussing "The Legacy of Reform", "Taft the Trustbuster", "U.S. Steel and Roosevelt", "Business and Regulation", and "The Banking Reform Movement" (explaining centralization of banking and the Aldrich Plan). Chapter Eight is entitled "The Politics of 1912" and includes such topics as "A Party is Formed" (explaining the role of the Progressive Party) and "The Democratic Victory" (explaining how the victory of Woodrow Wilson was achieved). Chapter Nine is entitled "Woodrow Wilson and the Triumph of Political Capitalism: Banking" which discusses how centralization of banking was achieved. This chapter includes topics discussing "Writing a Reform Bill", "The Bankers and the Glass Bill", "The Authorship of the Federal Reserve Act", and "The Fruits of Victory". Chapter Ten is entitled "The Triumph of Political Capitalism: The Federal Trade Commission and Trust Legislation" explaining how Wilson's "conservativism" under the guidance of Colonel House led to further regulation, the triumph of political capitalism. This chapter includes sections discussing "Wilson and Business", "The Campaign for Legislation", "The End of the New Freedom", and "The Commission Defines the Law". Kolko ends with a chapter entitled "Conclusion: The Lost Democracy" which discusses the fact that regulation was achieved to further the ends of business during the Progressive Era and that such regulation allowed for the triumph of political capitalism. Kolko discusses such topics as "Marx and Weber: Economics Versus Politics" (explaining how Marx and Weber misunderstood much of the goals of business and capitalism and explaining how Thorstein Vebel of all the economists of the Progressive Era offered the most trenchant understanding), and "Theory and the American Reality" (in which the author considers whether political capitalism changed after 1916 and whether the economic structure of the United States could have been different). Kolko ends by noting that the Progressive Era was noted by a failure of alternatives to grow and develop which ultimately led to the shaping of American economic civilization into the twentieth century and beyond.

This book offers a fascinating reinterpretation of the Progressive Era which attempts to show that business leaders to achieve their interests promoted regulation to stifle competition and achieve consolidation and centralization. This process is frequently referred to as "corporatism" and called "political capitalism" by Kolko. Kolko shows how through the machinery of politics big business was able to use the state to further its own interests and maintain monopoly power. This is an important book to read and understand if one wants to understand the economic history of the United States and the role of regulation as supported by business interests.

Sure, it's not the most fun read. It doesn't cover culture or social relations to any significant degree. Race relations and women's issues aren't covered, but that's not what this book is about. It only focuses on foreign policy in a peripheral manner. The book doesn't go into detail in how the working class or small businesses adapted to monopoly capitalism. It focuses mainly on big government and big business. Kolko goes into so much exhaustive detail that it's very difficult to disprove his thesis. Of course, Kolko lays down how monopoly capitalism was only possible with widespread collusion between big government and big business. Sadly, Kolko's scholarship has been used and abused by conservatives and libertarians. Even though modern day monopolies have been successful with little or no government interference, libertarians have little qualms making the claim that ALL regulations benefit businesses. Remember a few years ago when Microsoft had a vice like grip on the PC, home operating system market? Government stepped in and made them open up the APIs on Windows Explorer. Shortly thereafter, Mozilla and Chrome came to be prefered by the public. It probably would have happened, but the legislation made it sooner rather than later. Likewise, Android and IOS decimated Windows Mobile in the marketplace. Steam OS and Linux still can't compete with Windows to any significant degree. At least not in the USA. Corporations pay billions in fines for the government imposed regulations they violate. If regulations only supported monopolies, then corporations wouldn't violate any. I would say that this book was a bit of a slog for me. If I was in graduate school, it probably would have been much more enjoyable and/or relevant to say a master's or Phd thesis. For the public, there are few people who would find this enjoyable. I love Kolko's writing sytle. I may pick up one of his book's in the future.

A must read for understanding the inconvenient truth of American politics.

This a great book detailing the corporatism prevalent during the Progressive Era in America. The author has great information regarding the merger movement in the early 1900's as well. There are a few minor negatives to this book though.Some words which you may feel familiar with such as "conservatism," have a much different meaning then we attach to them today. Some of the concepts on mergers and capitalization can be quite confusing. The biggest negative, which is probably beyond the author's control, is the large amount of characters involved and the jumping around chronologically. Things can feel very out of order at times and you see so many names that it can be difficult to remember who is who.

Overall, I highly recommend this book. Just be aware of the small caveats you may face while reading this book.

The title gives it away. Banking regulation and other progressive era changes were made because the major players wanted an even playing field. This one is an old read that I lost but has now again joined my library.

Whenever you hear some liberal or progressive condemning big corporations. Have them read this book. If it weren't for big business, we wouldnt have alot of the regulation we do. Whether thats for good or ill. It was the meatpacking industry that lobbied for govt inspected meat in order to protect their exports to Europe. This is easily the easiest part of the book for the average person to understand.