Amazon Prime includes:
| Prime Benefits |
|
|---|---|
| Award winning movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video | ✓ |
| On demand, ad-free music streaming with Prime Music | ✓ |
| Early access to deals and savings with Prime Exclusives | ✓ |
Buy new:
-12% $15.00$15.00
Delivery Friday, August 30
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$9.98$9.98
Delivery Friday, August 30
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Pippin3428
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Eminent Victorians (Classic, 20th-Century, Penguin) Paperback – July 19, 1990
Purchase options and add-ons
Eminent Victorians marked an epoch in the art of biography; it also helped to crack the old myths of high Victorianism and to usher in a new spirit by which chauvinism, hypocrisy and the stiff upper lip were debunked. In it, Strachey cleverly exposes the self-seeking ambitions of Cardinal Manning and the manipulative, neurotic Florence Nightingale; and in his essays on Dr Arnold and General Gordon, his quarries are not only his subjects but also the public-school system and the whole structure of nineteenth-century liberal values.
For more than seventy years, Penguin has been the leading publisher of classic literature in the English-speaking world. With more than 1,700 titles, Penguin Classics represents a global bookshelf of the best works throughout history and across genres and disciplines. Readers trust the series to provide authoritative texts enhanced by introductions and notes by distinguished scholars and contemporary authors, as well as up-to-date translations by award-winning translators.
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin Classics
- Publication dateJuly 19, 1990
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions7.76 x 5.07 x 0.71 inches
- ISBN-100140183507
- ISBN-13978-0140183504
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought


Oscar WildePaperback$12.75 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Aug 30Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
None of Strachey's Victorians emerge unscathed. In his hands, Florence Nightingale is not a gentle archangel descended from heaven to minister sweetly to wounded soldiers, but rather an exacting, dictatorial, and judgmental crusader. Her "pen, in the virulence of its volubility, would rush ... to the denunciation of an incompetent surgeon or the ridicule of a self-sufficient nurse. Her sarcasm searched the ranks of the officials with the deadly and unsparing precision of a machine-gun. Her nicknames were terrible. She respected no one." Dr. Thomas Arnold, the man appointed to revamp the very private British public school system, fares little better: in Strachey's acid ink, he became "the founder of the worship of athletics and the worship of good form." In this same vain, military hero General Gordon is portrayed as a temperamental, irascible hermit, occasionally drunk and often found in the company of young boys--a man who tended to forget and forgo the tenets found in the Bible he kept with him always. And the powerful and popular Cardinal Manning, who came within a hair's breadth of succeeding Pope Pius IX, belonged, Strachey writes, "to that class of eminent ecclesiastics ... who have been distinguished less for saintliness and learning than for practical ability."
As he offered up indelible sketches of his less-than-fab four, Strachey was intent on critiquing established mores. This effortlessly superior wit knew full well that deep convictions and good deeds often go hand in hand with hypocrisy, arrogance, and egomania. His task was to pique those who pretended they did not. --Jordana Moskowitz
Review
About the Author
Michael Holroyd has written acclaimed biographies of Ellen Terry and Henry Irving, Augustus John, George Bernard Shaw, and Lytton Strachey as well as two memoirs, Basil StreetBlues, and Mosaic. Holroyd is the president emeritus of the Royal Society of Literature, knighted for his services to literature and the only nonfiction writer to have received the David Cohen British Prize for Literature. His book, A Strange Eventful History, won the James Tait Black Memorial Prize for biography in 2009. He lives in London with his wife, the novelist Margaret Drabble.
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Classics (July 19, 1990)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0140183507
- ISBN-13 : 978-0140183504
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 7.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 7.76 x 5.07 x 0.71 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #607,127 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #157 in Victorian Literary Criticism (Books)
- #687 in Historical British Biographies
- #834 in England History
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the reading experience positive and say the essay is definitely worth reading. However, they find a prodigious number of typos on every page.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book worth reading, with excellent biographies and fascinating stories. They also say the author reconstructed a plausible and coherent account of the four subjects.
"...He reconstructed a plausible and coherent account of what his four subjects (and several of the people with whom they interacted) were like, what..." Read more
"...It's a masterful biography, one that explores not just its purported subject but also the birth of Anglo-Catholicism...." Read more
"The four essays are easy to read. Strachey basically imitates Gibbon's style, although he disclaims it...." Read more
"Lytton Strachey is an amusing, arch, and eloquent writer...." Read more
Customers find the content of the book lacking. They mention that it contains a prodigious number of typos, flawed commentary, and poorly edited mess. Readers also appreciate the biographies but find the commentary flawed.
"...A prodigious number of typos (at least one on every page), one page left entirely blank, and lousy glued paper binding really mar the experience." Read more
"...Wilder Publications edition of Eminent Victorians is the most poorly edited mess I have ever stopped reading. Gayle Turner" Read more
"Excellent biographies; flawed commentary..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Strachey says in his preface that his biographies differ from "[t]hose fat two volumes ... with their tone of tedious panegyric." Anyone who has read Monypenny and Buckle's SIX volume biography of Disraeli, which goes out of its way to attribute to Disraeli every imaginable virtue (e.g., he loved children), knows what Strachey means.
However, if the reader ignores the allegations of generations of commentators and looks at what Strachey wrote without preconception, he will see that he admired all four of his subjects and meant for his readers to admire them. "[A] perfect English gentleman" is the way Strachey describes Sydney Herbert (page 121), and Strachey's description of him in that paragraph and the following pages shows that he meant that as the highest praise. Strachey even treats with impartiality and often empathy the aspect of Victorian life that by the time he was writing must have already seemed strange: the centrality of "old time religion" in the thought and lives of educated Victorians. (From the inception of printing through the year 1900, more books were published in the United Kingdom on religion than on all other subjects combined.)
Different as Strachey's subjects are from each other, they have one thing in common. All were rebels. Manning deserted the Church of England, one of the central pillars of the Victorian establishment. Nightingale defied the expectations of the way an upper-class woman should lead her life to challenge relentlessly and adamantly the British army and radically reform the nursing profession and army hospitals. Arnold radically reformed another bastion of the establishment: the public (i.e., private) schools. Gordon was an eccentric loner, who followed the opposite policy from the one he was sent to Khartoum to implement.
Nevertheless, all were greatly admired by those whom they led or cared for: Manning by British Catholics, Nightingale by the soldiers under her supervision, Arnold by his students (page 165), and Gordon by the people of the Sudan (page 208). More strikingly, these rebels, radicals, and eccentrics were heroes of British society; they were "eminent Victorians" in their own time. This fact must force the reader to re-assess one of the most prevalent stereotypes about the Victorians: their supposed insistence on conventionality and conformity.
In fact, Strachey achieved what Collingwood stated was the goal of history in his classic study The Idea of History (pages 231-49). He reconstructed a plausible and coherent account of what his four subjects (and several of the people with whom they interacted) were like, what motivated them, what "made them tick." It must be added (and this also fulfilled Collingwood's requirement) that Strachey's account is not plausible of human beings in general. Rather, it is historically plausible; it is plausible considering the specific time and place in which his subjects lived; and by providing it, Strachey illuminated important aspects of Victorian life and thought.
The answer may be that all four shared one unusual character trait, one so reminiscent of the Victorian age that even the thought of it brings the scent of lavender to mind: extreme earnestness. Each figure cared very, very deeply about something, but for each that earnestness also masked a corresponding personal craving. Like many young Britons in the post-WWI era, Strachey was deeply distrustful of earnestness, often seeing it as an excuse for personal gain or fulfillment. This was especially true when one man's deeply held beliefs sent others to their deaths, as it often had during WWI. He had no time for official incompetence, ignorance, or inaction, but often found the opposite just as dangerous.
The first essay in _Eminent Victorians_ is that of Cardinal Manning. Manning was a priest in the Church of England who became involved in the Oxford Movement, a group of churchmen who disliked the increasing secularization of the C of E and who wished to bring it back to its Catholic roots. Most of those involved remained in the Anglican communion, forming the nucleus of the "High Church" movement of the late 19th century. Manning found that he could not stop at that, though; unable to reconcile his belief in a Church Universal with his membership in a church that existed basically because Henry VIII was a serial adulterer, and unable to 'take back' the text of a tract he had written that was deeply critical of the Anglican church and which eliminated any chances of his gaining higher office, Manning found himself eventually in the arms of Rome. Strachey paints Manning as a weak, vacillating, impulsive man of great ambition whose conversion to Roman Catholicism was as much a political and career move as one of the heart and soul. Had Manning remained in the Church of England, Strachey implies, he would have been an archdeacon until death; only conversion to Roman Catholicism allowed him to fulfil his ambitions towards higher office. It's a masterful biography, one that explores not just its purported subject but also the birth of Anglo-Catholicism.
The third essay, of Rugby school headmaster Matthew Arnold, reveals Strachey's hatred of the English public school system (or what we in North America would call the private school system). He skewers Arnold for failing to make the educational reforms he was hired to make and for delegating the discipline of younger students to the senior class, thereby condoning and even encouraging the type of severe bullying that caused many young men to consider suicide. Arnold, whose earnestness in creating 'Christian gentlemen' did not go so far as to allow him to teach them himself, refused to update the school curriculum ostensibly because gentlemen didn't need science, maths, or English literature, but really (as Strachey contends) because Arnold had studied Latin and Greek himself and didn't want to feel his own learning was unnecessary. Strachey points out that Arnold did little at Rugby except pronounce the Sunday sermon, intimidate students, and foster a personality cult that eventually made him the father of modern education in many Britons' eyes - even though he made no changes to the educational system itself. His reforms in discipline and in religion (and his lack of reforms in curriculum) were copied by most public schools, to the great detriment of the British people.
In Strachey's essay on General Gordon, Strachey shows how a brave man with a strong belief in the rightness of his cause and an overwhelming desire for adventure may have been used to precipitate a war and to advance the cause of imperialism. Gordon, a war veteran and former colonial administrator (and a rather unstable fellow), was sent to the Sudan during a revolt to report on conditions there and to evacuate civilians who were loyal to Egypt, which was then controlled by the British. Gordon did none of the above; he instead tried to wipe out the insurrection, and for his troubles was killed and his staff and allies massacred. His death was used by the imperialist factions in the ruling party as a call to arms. Strachey wonders: was this deliberate? Was Gordon given alternate instructions by the imperialists? Did they intend for him to die, so that his death could be used as a rallying point for further imperialism? He argues his point well, and the essay is definitely worth reading.
Strachey's portrait of Florence Nightingale is not quite as successful as the rest. Nightingale was born into a wealthy family, and like all young women of her class and time was expected to marry young, have children, and generally be nothing more than a society lady. Florence wanted more: she wanted to work, to make a difference, to change the world, and she wanted everybody around her to work as hard as she did. After many years of waiting, she finally had her chance; her efforts to reform British military hospitals and eventually the practice of medicine in the Empire did in fact change the world. Strachey seems to have thought that she pushed her colleagues too hard, that her own drive was so abnormal that her friends and family could not keep up. Granted, she did push some of her colleagues very hard, and one may have even died from overwork, but they chose to work with her because they believed in her, and given what she was able to do I think they were right to believe in her. It also appears that Strachey may not have been comfortable with a woman refusing to hide her intelligence or personal strength when dealing with men. I had the distinct impression while reading this essay that Strachey was sneering at those men who took orders from Nightingale or who assisted her in her work. Another reviewer mentioned that Nightingale is portrayed here as a 'pushy woman' - and she certainly is; however, most of Strachey's implied criticism seems to be directed towards the men who treated her as the intelligent, hard-working, valuable human being she was. Strachey also seems to have viewed her invalid status as something of a neurotic problem, which in the light of recent research (showing that she likely had undulant fever) may not be accurate.
In any event, the movie demonstrates just what a blockbuster this book was when it was published in 1918. It took Britain by storm and made Strachey a ballyhooed celebrity, however constitutionally unsuited he was for the part. And having read it, one understands why. Strachey was a wordsmith of inestimable talent who masterfully relates the life stories of four Victorian superstars (only two of whom, Florence Nightingale and General Gordon are familiar to us today) with a flashing wit and unfailing insightfulness that lets the reader delight in guessing whether at any particular moment he’s praising or condemning his subject. Relentlessly sardonic, but seldom sarcastic, his portraits are the very models of damning with faint praise.
So, whether you are a fan of the period or not, you owe it to yourself to read “Eminent Victorians.” Its popularity has endured for nearly a century because it’s not a book relevant only to a particular slice of history, but for all literary time.
Top reviews from other countries
Cardinal Manning is first up. Religion is a constant theme in the book and Manning emerges as the least pious of its subjects. As described, he was ambitious, mean spirited and concerned with all the wrong aspects of religion: dogmatic, theological abstraction rather than charity, etc. There may be a selection bias at work here: Manning's social work is mentioned briefly, but Strachey is more interested in Manning's faults than his strengths. And let's be honest, who isn't?
Florence nightingale is next. Strachey starts by warning us that she was less agreeable than her legend suggests. However, compared to modern biographies this is mild stuff. She was head-strong and possibly neurotic; when weighed against her achievements these are very minor faults, and after reading this biography she went up in my estimation greatly. The villains of this piece are the purblind members of the establishment, against whom she battled. They are subject to the full force of Strachey's gentle sarcasm.
Thomas Arnold is portrayed as the father of the modern public school system. Like Nightingale, he combined piety with practicality, though with results of less certain value. To modern eyes his methods appear unorthodox, his deprecation of scientific knowledge looks bizarre, but his focus on moral education is refreshing. I suspect Strachey, writing in the aftermath of the First World War, found even this questionable.
Despite being titled The End of General Gordon, the last section offers perhaps the fullest biography. This is fortunate, as Charles Gordon was a fascinating character: brilliant, mercurial and eccentric. There is also a stronger narrative drive to this section as we know where Gordon was heading: to a bad end in the heat of the Sudan. Ultimately the tale that emerges is of an incoherent, duplicitous government that exploits Gordon as much for his weaknesses as for his strengths.
George MacDonald Fraser once wrote "You cannot, you must not, judge the past by the present; you must try to see it in its own terms and values, if you are to have any inkling of it." Well, Strachey isn't much interested in that. With his uniform tone of dry wit and his gentle digs he frequently invites us to judge events on our terms. He was writing in a period much closer to the Victorian age than we are to his, to correct a popular image that we no longer possess. As a result, the composite picture that emerges tells us as much about Strachey's age as it does the Victorian's. Does this matter? Not much. Despite Strachey's aims, this book is best appreciated as a collection of biographies: four breezy accounts of four remarkable individuals.





