Buy new:
-30% $19.52$19.52
Delivery Wednesday, January 15
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$9.53$9.53
Delivery Thursday, January 16
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The End of Time: The Next Revolution in Physics Reprint Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
In this highly provocative volume, Barbour presents the basic evidence for a timeless universe, and shows why we still experience the world as intensely temporal. It is a book that strikes at the heart of modern physics. It casts doubt on Einstein's greatest contribution, the spacetime continuum, but also points to the solution of one of the great paradoxes of modern science, the chasm between classical and quantum physics. Indeed, Barbour argues that the holy grail of physicists--the unification of Einstein's general relativity with quantum mechanics--may well spell the end of time.
Barbour writes with remarkable clarity as he ranges from the ancient philosophers Heraclitus and Parmenides, through the giants of science Galileo, Newton, and Einstein, to the work of the contemporary physicists John Wheeler, Roger Penrose, and Steven Hawking. Along the way he treats us to enticing glimpses of some of the mysteries of the universe, and presents intriguing ideas about multiple worlds, time travel, immortality, and, above all, the illusion of motion.
The End of Time is a vibrantly written and revolutionary book. It turns our understanding of reality inside-out.
- ISBN-100195145925
- ISBN-13978-0195145922
- EditionReprint
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateNovember 29, 2001
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.21 x 6.14 x 0.8 inches
- Print length384 pages
Frequently bought together

Similar items that ship from close to you
Editorial Reviews
Review
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; Reprint edition (November 29, 2001)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195145925
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195145922
- Item Weight : 1.21 pounds
- Dimensions : 9.21 x 6.14 x 0.8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #122,980 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #27 in Physics of Time (Books)
- #75 in Relativity Physics (Books)
- #166 in Quantum Theory (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book's concepts interesting and provide a richer view of science. They consider it worthwhile and a rewarding challenge. However, opinions differ on the physics content - some find it well-written and easy to understand, while others feel it's hard for novices to comprehend.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book thought-provoking and challenging. They say it provides a richer view of science, including its history. The book explores bold ideas and is considered serious about the author's work.
"...But at the same time, this is a deeper book with much bolder ideas than what is often peddled as revolutionary in the cosmology department...." Read more
"...However, the book is worth the effort because of the rich exploration of related topics that seem to support the Standard Model, General Relativity,..." Read more
"This is a serious book about his own work, and Julian Barbour should be commended for reaching such a wide audience...." Read more
"...written and Barbour makes an excellent job to make a very hard technical topic intuitive and accessible...." Read more
Customers find the book interesting and worth reading. They appreciate the great content and challenging but rewarding challenge.
"...However, the book is worth the effort because of the rich exploration of related topics that seem to support the Standard Model, General Relativity,..." Read more
"...In fact he points out a lot of things and is worth reading if only for that. I would now like to add my own two cents worth...." Read more
"...it could have been presented in a shorter format, it is certainly worth the read." Read more
"...This is well worth the read for anyone obsessed with trying to comprehend reality." Read more
Customers have different views on the book's readability. Some find it well-written and easy to understand, while others feel it is difficult for novices to comprehend and not suitable for beginners.
"...So for me it strikes a nice balance between expert and light reading. I recommend it for folks looking for the same." Read more
"...Still I give this book 5 stars, since it is extremely well written and Barbour makes an excellent job to make a very hard technical topic intuitive..." Read more
"It was a rough slog wading through this book...." Read more
"...It is far beyond my novice capability to comprehend. I think four years of college is not quite enough education to grasp this theory...." Read more
Customers have different views on the physics in the book. Some find it ground-breaking and the best book on quantum perspective, while others say there is no present moment or movement in time in physics.
"...that seem to support the Standard Model, General Relativity, particle physics, quantum mechanics, and quantum cosmology...." Read more
"...o Time Reversal Invariance is nothing new either. There's no direction of time in physics...." Read more
"Perhaps the best book on the quantum perspective...." Read more
"Reader beware: This is hardcore theoretical physics, and as deep a thinker I believe myself to be, I clearly lack the education to keep up with a..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 13, 2011This is a serious book about his own work, and Julian Barbour should be commended for reaching such a wide audience. He obviously shares the opinions of Einstein and Feynman that if you understand a new theory thoroughly you should be able to explain it to the layman.
If you want to combine Einstein's theory of gravity with quantum mechanics, it is well known that there are serious obstacles.
First obstacle: GR(General Relativity) is real and QM (quantum mechanics) is complex. (By complex, we mean z = x + iy, where i is the square root of -1.)
JB (Julian Barbour) attacks this problem using his two main weapons: History and Philosophy.
History: Schrodinger's first equation (I didn't know this) was real. It was also the one that he used to solve the problem of the hydrogen atom, which got him the Nobel prize.
But Schrodinger's first equation also was static--i.e. timeless. It was also a first order differential equation.
When Schrodinger later was developing his equation for the amplitude function that evolved with time, he was horrified to find that it turned into a second order differential equation, in which second derivatives appear. To bring it back down to a first order equation again, he used the trick that electrical engineers use: He introduced complex numbers. When they say that the impedance of a coil of wire is complex, it isn't really complex. This is just a mathematical trick based on the fact that AC current is sinusoidal and therefore satisfies a simple second order differential equation. By using complex numbers, they eliminate, in this case, differential equations altogether.
So Schrodinger eliminated second derivatives at the cost of making the amplitude complex.
Philosophy: JB's secoond weapon. He is an expert on Mach's two Principles. The second principle states essentially that inertia is an effect of the distant matter in the universe. JB uses this principle to produce a totally new geometry that he calls "Platonia," in which there is no time.
JB believes that GR and QM can be combined in Platonia into a timeless theory. In his view, we must unshackle QM from the confines of Euclidean geometry and its Lorenz variant.
Believe it or not, JB and others have shown that GR can be formulated in Platonia as is, and that Mach's principles are totally built into the fabric of GR (a fact that would have pleased Einstein). He even quotes results of others showing that GR is in a sense timeless despite earnest attempts to incorporate time into it.
JB has technical papers on his website backing up these claims, but he also goes on to speculate what a cosmological theory would look like.
By the way, he supports something like the "no collapse" view of Everett, but points out a serious flaw in Everett's view. In fact he points out a lot of things and is worth reading if only for that.
I would now like to add my own two cents worth.
Quantum Field theory is normally presented as if it lived in Minkowski space time, but it really doesn't. Consider the following:
1) A Fermion (e.g. an electron) must rotate twice (720 degrees) before it returns to its original state.
2) Feynman's virtual particles exist outside the light cone.
3) Feynman's method of summing over histories has a distinct "out of time" flavor to it. True it does tell how a particle can move from one place at one time to another place at another time, but the process takes place out of time. JB says (private communication) that it may be possible to model the Feynman propagator in Platonia.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2012Barbour has done his homework, but he fails to properly support his own premises. He boldly gives his own opinions/conjectures, but fails to use standard philosophical, experimental, formulaic, support. He admits that his premises are merely "qualitative" and not well supported. However, the book is worth the effort because of the rich exploration of related topics that seem to support the Standard Model, General Relativity, particle physics, quantum mechanics, and quantum cosmology.
I recommend that you read Leonard Susskind's books, Black Hole Wars, and The Cosmic Landscape; Hawking's A Briefer History of Time, and Black Holes and Baby Universes; Roger Penrose's The Road to Reality(for advanced readers who love math); Greene's The Hidden Reality; String Theory for Dummies. . . and to bring your math up to some level of snuff: Precalculus Demystified; Blitzer's Intermediate Algebra; Calculus Demystified forcusing on Intro. to derivatives, partial derivatives, applications related to physics; Calculus Demystified, or for Dummies; and any related material you may already have. Also see Smolin's What's Wrong with Physics, and Woit's Not Even Wrong. Use Wikipedia for terms you are fuzzy on, and think, think, think. . . Barbour tries but fails to justify our dumping of time, motion, and dynamics! ! !
- Reviewed in the United States on June 23, 2021I bought this book because I think time is no more than a very useful idea that we all share. THIS IS, BY NO MEANS, AN ORIGINAL IDEA. Time is in our minds and language, as well as the minds and language of everyone around us, so often that that makes it near impossible to imagine that it's nothing more than that. The case is simple, and most people won't buy it; we prove that time exists because we see endless change and motion. Without those, we wouldn't need time, and wouldn't think it exists - if we could think at all, given that thinking is about mental changes, likely related to physical/chemical changes in our brains. But, if we remove the assumption that change/motion is something that happens in time, or, somehow, because of time - just for a moment - (HAH!!) - then how does change/motion PROVE that time exists? The answer is, it simply doesn't. It's just change and motion. We compare this change here - say, the physical change and motion that happens in a clock, to just about every other change. How many changes in a clock compared to the change of us moving from one place to another. How many changes we call WORK compared to those clock changes. How many changes on that clock and, by extension, how many days and years - all changes in the Earth's movement relative to the sun, before our bodies will change.
A big reason we believe in that extra something - time - is that we use it endlessly to coordinate our actions (motions and changes) with other people. Acting together is what makes us a very, very powerful species. We use changes in clocks, days, years to act at the same "time", and in the most effective sequence of actions. That's why we all talk and think about time so much.
I really doubt most people will accept this but, maybe, just consider the idea, because it's interesting. Notice that what we all perceive, all the...time...is change. Notice that we really don't have to add the idea of time to that, that we could just stay with change. You'll still need clocks, because we all need, and want, to act WITH other people. But, again, notice that clocks are about the changes on a dial or on a digital display compared with all the other changes we see around us.
Barbour thinks time is an illusion, but he also feels the need to do away with cause and effect. A sequence of changes, a chain of cause and effect, somehow, tells him that time must be real. So, he posits that motion is also an illusion. Things just are, and have no causes, because there's no motion that could allow a cause to result in an effect. He tries to make the case that motion, and an endless chain of causes and effects, are mental illusions that we all share, very like the illusion that tells us that the Sun revolves around the Earth. For him, a change - any change, can't precede another change, because that sequence demonstrates time.
I don't think it does. I think it's all just changes and motion, and that the sequence of causes and effects make a lot more sense than the notion that all motion is an illusion. It makes a lot more sense than the idea that changes exist because our minds work in a way that now sees this whatever, then see it changed, and now changed again. Occam's razor tells us motion happens, and they happen in sequence, with one motion/change leading to the next.
Overall, although I disagree with some very important points that he attempts to make, there's a lot of scientific ideas and discussion, and it all comes together in a very interesting way.
Top reviews from other countries
JamieReviewed in Canada on March 9, 20245.0 out of 5 stars Excellent book.
Very satisfying. By a deep thinker.
-
Cliente de AmazonReviewed in Mexico on June 23, 20171.0 out of 5 stars Pésimo libro.
Es una verdadera porquería de libro. Sin seriedad. Especulativo. Enredado. No aporta nada importante al asunto de la naturaleza del tiempo. No lo recomiendo en absoluto.
Farooque ParvezReviewed in India on January 11, 20195.0 out of 5 stars Original and insightful
The book tells a story that Einstien did not fully utilize in his formulation of Relativity,thanks Barbour.....
Anthony W KellyReviewed in Australia on August 9, 20212.0 out of 5 stars I gave up
Love pop science books but this is the first I just gave up on. Even with a reasonable high school standard physics background I could not follow it at all
-
derudderReviewed in France on March 4, 20175.0 out of 5 stars à lire et relire
Un peu compliqué car écrit en anglais mais tellement bien qu'il mérite une deuxième lecture. A lire et à relire!




