
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-9% $14.56$14.56
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$9.75$9.75
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Learn more
0.27 mi | MANASSAS 20110
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War Paperback – May 29, 2007
Purchase options and add-ons
Filled with news-making revelations that made it a New York Times bestseller, Hubris takes us behind the scenes at the White House, CIA, Pentagon, State Department, and Congress to show how George W. Bush came to invade Iraq--and how his administration struggled with the devastating fallout.
Hubris connects the dots between Bush's expletive-laden outbursts at Saddam Hussein, the bitter battles between the CIA and the White House, the fights within the intelligence community over Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction, the outing of an undercover CIA officer, and the Bush administration's misleading sales campaign for war. Written by veteran reporters Michael Isikoff and David Corn, this is an inside look at how a president took the nation to war using faulty and fraudulent intelligence. It's a dramatic page-turner and an intriguing account of conspiracy, backstabbing, bureaucratic ineptitude, journalistic malfeasance, and arrogance.
- Print length496 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherCrown
- Publication dateMay 29, 2007
- Dimensions5.17 x 1.07 x 8.01 inches
- ISBN-10030734682X
- ISBN-13978-0307346827
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin's War on America and the Election of Donald TrumpHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Wednesday, Jan 15Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Find Me the Votes: A Hard-Charging Georgia Prosecutor, a Rogue President, and the Plot to Steal an American ElectionHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Saturday, Jan 11
Hubris: The American Origins of Russia's War against UkraineHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 28This title has not yet been released.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book insightful and well-researched. They describe it as a riveting read that keeps them hooked. The book is accurate and well-documented, providing an in-depth account of the events leading up to the Iraq War. Readers praise the writing quality as concise and well-organized. However, opinions differ on its authenticity, with some finding it a great expose of the Bush administration and an excellent summary of the period, while others criticize the deception, arrogance, and incompetence of the Bush administration.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book provides an in-depth account of the Iraq War. It offers amazing insight into the development of our current involvement in the war. The book tells the unvarnished truth about how George W. Bush led our country into it, through careful documentation of irrefutable actual facts.
"...The book also explores a world of intrigue – Iraqi agents meeting with al-Qaeda operatives in Prague, Iraqi spies and defectors, including one..." Read more
"...Iraqi debacle a book like this, with actual details that are pretty hard to refute, is like exposing Count Dracula to sunlight...." Read more
"This well-researched narrative, like the book Fiasco, looks at Bush's spiteful fantasy of toppling his father's personal enemy Saddam Hussein, and..." Read more
"...It is very interesting and a bit confusing." Read more
Customers find the book easy to read and engaging. They say it's a great book for understanding what led up to the Iraq War and an excellent supplement to watching the MSNBC special of the same name.
"...And that merely skims the surface. “Hubris” is a riveting book and, indeed, another one about corrupt politicians spinning a web of lies..." Read more
"The first two thirds of this excellent book reiterated what many of us in the Vietnam War generation had suspected as the road to war unfolded day..." Read more
"...The book is good, it digs, it points but it never really gets someone by the collar, at least not strong enough for there to be anything to get my..." Read more
"...] is worth reading if after 10 years you are interested in knowing why some people believed..." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's accuracy. They find it well-researched, with documented evidence. The book provides useful information and is considered worthwhile.
"A well researched and ultimately compelling indictment of the Bush 43 rationale for the invasion of Iraq...." Read more
"...Corn and Isikoff have done a magnificent job." Read more
"...fits in quite well in the growing collection of well-written, well-documented works that paint an undeniable portrait of this Administration..." Read more
"...The book is a well documented and well written piece of factual reporting. It should be required reading in secondary schools." Read more
Customers find the writing quality good. They say the narration is well-written and the factual matrix is clear.
"...It’s very well-written and informative, thorough and thought-provoking...." Read more
"...Hubris is a tightly written account of how and what the Bush Administration did to get us into this illegal war. It is a great book ." Read more
"Hubris reads like a page turning thriller! The writing is spot on - full of back room intrigue which kept me gasping with disbelief...." Read more
"The narration is beautifully laid out. The factual matrix is easily discernible...." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the book. Some find it an excellent summary of the period and an inside view of the Bush administration. They appreciate the chronological details of the scandal and spin that accompanied it. Others feel the book is biased and filled with false information, describing it as a fake war exposed.
"...It is very interesting and a bit confusing." Read more
"...This comprehensive review of how top officials leading up to the invasion of Iraq are willing to break the law in pursuit of their personal goals is..." Read more
"...American government discourages transparency, making investigative journalism much harder...." Read more
"...of the scandal, the spin that accompanied it and an inside view of the Bush administration and the war hawks who appear, from day 1, to have Iraq in..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 9, 2020First there was 9/11. Then President George Bush and his administration decided to take revenge by publicly linking Saddam Hussein, president of Iraq and formerly an ally of the United States, to the attack on the Twin Towers in New York City, thus serving as the pretext for the Iraq War, which began in 2003, and continued on for more than a decade.
Written by award winning journalists Michael Isikoff and David Corn, “Hubris” focuses on that campaign, which was based largely on deception. 9/11 had happened recently, and the American people were out for blood. So the Bush administration threw them a bone by alleging that Saddam Hussein had ties to the 9/11 terrorists if not direct knowledge of the attack beforehand, and that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. The government, that is, branded Hussein a national security threat as an excuse, later proved without merit, for going to war.
America’s excursion into Iraq was costly, both in terms of human lives and money. “Hubris,” so-called because of the Bush Administration’s overwhelming confidence that their ruse would work, describes how such an arrogant stunt cost at least 190,000 lives, mostly civilian, and some $2.2 trillion in U.S. taxpayer money. The administration was already determined to go to war with Iraq. They simply needed to make the case to the American public.
The book also explores a world of intrigue – Iraqi agents meeting with al-Qaeda operatives in Prague, Iraqi spies and defectors, including one codenamed Curveball, a CIA-supported, convicted embezzler and member of the Iraqi National Congress named Ahmed Chalabi, a scandal involving dubious information from an intelligence source out of Italy alleging that Iraq tried to buy yellowcake uranium from Niger, and that it had, therefore, illegally revived the nuclear program the international community had forced it to terminate in the 1990s. U.S. diplomat Joseph Wilson went to that country to investigate the claims, but later refuted them. To compound things, a reporter outed his wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA agent.
And that merely skims the surface.
“Hubris” is a riveting book and, indeed, another one about corrupt politicians spinning a web of lies to influence the American public. It’s very well-written and informative, thorough and thought-provoking. One could even dub it a Greek tragedy clothed in the ungodly accouterments of political Americana, its actors intoxicated on that poisonous nectar called hubris.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2015A well researched and ultimately compelling indictment of the Bush 43 rationale for the invasion of Iraq. For those that continue to espouse support for the Iraqi debacle a book like this, with actual details that are pretty hard to refute, is like exposing Count Dracula to sunlight. Isikoff demolishes the WMD rationale for invasion thoroughly; in doing so he brings to light not just "intelligence failures" but the subtle, and not so subtle, pressure on the intelligence community to conform to pre-existing theories on Saddam Hussein brought into the new Administration by the likes of Cheney, Wolfowitz, Feith, and the President.
The book covers the serial incompetence involved in planning the Iraq war, and how specifically the intelligence community was compromised by the strong desire of the Administration to go to war. War apologists generally try to skirt details, since they are so damning; Isikoff gives you those details in several key areas. Want to recollect how the Administration twisted the fact sets on the "tubes" they accused Iraq of purchasing for centrifuges? Isikoff not only shows you what nonsense that was, but more importantly that the Administration was aware of the problems with the conclusions they were trying to sell the public. A favorite tactic? Leak "inside information" to selected journalists, and then go on Meet the Press and cite those very same news stories as "evidence" of Saddam's WMD Program(s).
"So there was Cheney on television citing the Times. He said that he could not reveal intelligence sources, but with the Times story, “it’s now public that, in fact, [Saddam] has been seeking to acquire” the tubes for his nuclear weapons enterprise. We know this, Cheney claimed, “with absolute certainty.” Millions of Meet the Press viewers could be forgiven for not realizing that Cheney was citing an article based on information that had come from his own administration. And Cheney went further by remarking that he could not say whether or not Saddam already had a nuclear weapon, leaving that an open possibility. It was a disingenuous remark, for no U.S. intelligence analyst at the time believed that Saddam had his hands on a nuclear bomb."
Many folks were astounded by the outrageous claims, but many went along for the ride."
"A CIA officer involved in the tubes episode called it a 'perfect coming together of arrogance, incompetence, and basic human error. These screw-ups happen all the time, just not with consequences this enormous."
It was not just Cheney, although his complicity in the misinformation campaign was critical. The President sold nonsense enthusiastically.
”Bush and Blair also talked about the aluminum tubes. The president assured the prime minister the IAEA was wrong to conclude that the tubes were for artillery rockets, not for a nuclear program. Bush insisted that the specifications of the tubes indicated they were indeed right for a nuclear centrifuge. And when the two talked briefly about postinvasion Iraq, Bush remarked that it was “unlikely there would be internecine warfare between the different religious and ethnic groups.” Blair agreed."
The Niger yellowcake debacle, in which, despite repeated entreaties from the CIA, the Administration continued to perpetrate the lie that Iraq had attempted to purchase a vast sum of "yellowcake" for its nuclear program, is covered with great specificity. Another detail that war apologists, and the Bush Administration prefer to forget. The pressure to ignore contrary intel on the yellowcake claim is covered in great detail, leading to the famous use of the sixteen words in a Bush State of the Union Address. A national embarrassment. The Bush Administration attempt to dump that fiasco at the feet of the CIA is fairly easily set aside.
"Eleven days previously, the White House had blamed the CIA for the sixteen words. Now aides were aware of documents showing that the national security adviser, the deputy national security adviser, and the chief speechwriter had ignored clear warnings from the CIA."
Eventually the White House would have to acknowledge that the clear and unambiguous warnings were ignored. The CIA, eager to please, gave warnings but did not do the independent job that should be expected from them. They seemed to realize, at some level, that the Administration was selling snake oil, but ultimately were compromised themselves, especially Director George Tenet. A good snippet from the book gets right to the fundamental question of what the intel actually showed, with Tenet not able to answer a simple question from Joe Biden:"But when Biden and other committee members pressed Tenet on the sourcing for these claims, they got little in the way of answers. During the questioning, a committee staff member slipped Biden a note with a suggested query, and Biden put this question to Tenet: What “technically collected” evidence did the CIA have of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction? What the staffer had in mind was physical proof: radioactive emissions from nuclear sites, electronic intercepts, samples of biological agents. Anything that would be hard and irrefutable. “None, Senator,” Tenet replied. There was a hush in the room. Oh my God, the staffer thought. “ ‘None, Senator’—that answer will ring in my ears as long as I live,” the aide remarked later. Biden appeared bothered. He asked Tenet, “George, do you want me to clear the staff out of the room?” It was a way of asking if Tenet possessed superclassified information, some technical evidence that was so black, so secret, that it couldn’t be shared."
How did we get to the idea of invading Iraq? Maybe the most important piece of this outrageous series of lies by the Administration was the role of Ahmad Chalabi, and his direct connection to the State of Iran. Chalabi led the Administration by the nose, and even when he was exposed as a total fraud continued to enjoy political support from within the Administration. And what was the connection with Iran, and their intelligence services?
"In late May, Iraqi police, supported by American soldiers, raided the Baghdad home and offices of Ahmad Chalabi, who had become a member of the Iraqi interim governing council created by the U.S. government. U.S. troops seized computers, records, and rifles from two offices of Chalabi’s Iraqi National Congress. An Iraqi judge said the raids were part of an investigation of assorted crimes: torturing people, stealing cars, seizing government facilities. One of the arrest warrants was for Aras Habib, the INC’s intelligence director. Habib had run the group’s controversial “intelligence collection program,” which had supplied fabricating defectors and bogus information to dozens of media outlets before the war. He also had been suspected by the CIA of being an Iranian agent for years—ever since Bob Baer and Maguire had dealt with him in the mid-1990s."
"As for Habib, he vanished around the time of the raid on the INC headquarters. His suspicious disappearance raised an intriguing and significant question: Had the fellow responsible for slipping bogus INC “intelligence” on Iraq’s supposed WMDs to U.S. officials and journalists—information concocted to start a war—done so at the behest of Iranian intelligence? Had the U.S. government and the American public been the target of an Iranian intelligence operation designed to nudge the United States to war? These were questions U.S. intelligence agencies never seriously investigated."
Chalabi's role is one of the greatest outrages of the adventure, and must lead to an examination of the geo-political ramifications of the war. That piece is not covered in the book, but any discussion of the war should reference the fact that the regional player most positively impacted by the U.S. invasion of Iraq was Iran. The Shia assumption of power in Iraq, and the direct connection of many of the new members of the Iraqi government to Iran, made this connection easy to discern not only while it was happening, but before the invasion as well. The neo-cons displayed a shocking lack of even the most fundamental understanding of the regional equilibrium, and how this invasion would tip that equilibrium over in a very negative way for the United States. We continue to suffer the ill effects to this very day, with the ironic twist that many of the same neo-cons who advocated the Iraqi debacle today decry the potential for regional hegemony by Iran.
Of course the Iraqi debacle contains not only the Bush Administration cooking the intel books to justify invasion, but also displaying some of the greatest incompetence in managing Iraq as an occupying power after the fall of the Saddam regime. The book highlights some of the greatest errors committed, but is not strong on post war management. For that I will re-read Bob Woodward's "State of Denial". Isikoff gives a very detailed examination of the so called Valerie Plame affair, with Bush Administration officials blowing the cover of CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson in an attempt to discredit her husband, a vocal critic of the Bush Administration on the interpretation of the so called "Niger-Iraq Yellowcake" intel. Maybe a bit much on this subject, but certainly shows the mindset that brought us to this disaster.
A highly recommended book by an author not afraid to bring the light of day to the dishonest and incompetent handling of the Iraq debacle by the Bush Administration.
Top reviews from other countries
BearLoverReviewed in Canada on January 30, 20175.0 out of 5 stars Can you handle the truth
Great book - unfortunately American's can't handle the true
AlenaReviewed in the United Kingdom on April 10, 20115.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant reference
This is a brilliant reference book. It's one weakness is that it tells you almost nothing about why people did what they did, but if you want to know when they did it, who was involved and who knew what at the time it happened, then this is the book for you. Reading anything about the Iraq war, its origins and conduct without this book by your side is a waste of time. There is proof and rebuttal on every page for every known theory, including the official line, and as I say, it offers no theory of its own, so it's as near to objective as you are going to get. Thanks, guys!
Ernie LReviewed in Canada on October 16, 20174.0 out of 5 stars Good read, many players.
Long winded at times but interesting and goes to show how governments can somehow lose control, haven't quite finished it as yet.
PinotReviewed in the United Kingdom on May 25, 20154.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
Michael does a good job. I just hate how the world was duped by this cabal!
TullyReviewed in the United Kingdom on October 6, 20175.0 out of 5 stars Worthwhile read
Excellent analysis, very well documented and in an accessible style. The events recounted leave little room for doubt about the reasons for the Iraq War, which are today widely known. But the inside analysis is still worth a read. Written two years before Obama became President.

