Buy new:
-14% $25.71$25.71
FREE delivery Wednesday, January 8
Ships from: Celikbooks Sold by: Celikbooks
Save with Used - Acceptable
$7.93$7.93
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: -OnTimeBooks-
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
While America Sleeps: Self-Delusion, Military Weakness, and the Threat to Peace Today Paperback – November 10, 2001
Purchase options and add-ons
In While England Slept Winston Churchill revealed in 1938 how the inadequacy of Britain's military forces to cope with worldwide responsibilities in a peaceful but tense era crippled its ability to deter or even adequately prepare for World War II.
In While America Sleeps, historians Donald and Frederick W. Kagan retrace Britain's international and defense policies during the years after World War I leading up to World War II, showing how self-delusion and an unwillingness to face the inescapable responsibilities on which their security and the peace of the world depended cost the British dearly. The Kagans then turn their attention to America and argue that our nation finds itself in a position similar to that of Britain in the 1920s. For all its emergency interventions the U.S. has not yet accepted its unique responsibility to take the lead in preserving the peace. Years of military cutbacks―the "peace dividend" following the buildup and triumph over Communism of the Reagan years―have weakened our armed forces and left us with too few armed forces to cover too many possible threats. This has caused us to bank everything on high tech "smart" weapons―some of which have not yet been invented and others that we are not acquiring or deploying―as opposed to the long-term commitment of money, fighting men and women, and planning that the deterrence of a major war would require. This failure to shape a policy and to commit the resources needed to maintain peace has cost valuable time in shaping a peaceful world and has placed America's long-term security in danger.
The policies of the Bush and Clinton administrations have left us in a position where we cannot avoid war and keep the peace in areas vital to our security. Neither have the post-Cold War policies sent clear signals to would-be aggressors that the U.S. can and will resist them. Tensions in the Middle East, instability in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, the nuclear confrontation between India and Pakistan, the development of nuclear weapons and missile by North Korea, and the menacing threats and actions of China, with its immense population, resentful sense of grievance and years of military buildup, all hint that the current peaceful era will not last forever. Can we make it last as long as possible? Are we prepared to face its collapse?
While America Sleeps is a sobering work of history that poses a thoughtful challenge to policy-makers.
- Print length483 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateNovember 10, 2001
- Dimensions6.14 x 1 x 9.21 inches
- ISBN-10027486505X
- ISBN-13978-0312283742
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Customers who bought this item also bought
Finding the Target: The Transformation of American Military PolicyHardcover$4.54 shippingGet it Jan 7 - 10Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Kennan: A Life between WorldsHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3Only 19 left in stock (more on the way).
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2015Great book, great shape...just as advertised. Fantastic seller!!! Thanks so much.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 15, 2004The authors are impressed that Sparta defeated Athens. America is dangerously weak on defense, they argue, just like Athens. My reply is that vast expenditure on defense did not save the USSR. In fact, it was the reason for its collapse.
History repeats itself all right, but never exactly. This much we know. Besides, this book is not enlightened by any non-Western history, of which the Kagans know nothing.
The Kagans are certainly right that history tells us that your enemy could be an unexpected one. Churchill writing after WWI had no idea Japan would be Britain's enemy, and no one in 1917 could imagine Russia becoming America's mortal enemy for four-and-a-half decades. Those who think China is going to be trouble should take this lesson to heart.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2000"America is in danger."
With a single, direct statement, historians Donald and Frederick Kagan embark on a complex journey that traces the imminent fall of the American dynasty. Exploring the nuances of national security policy, engagement strategy, and the apparent decline of the military, the Kagans offer a provocative portrait of the collapse of modern Rome, a latter-day empire suffering from self-delusion and a general unwillingness to face the inescapable responsibilities upon which the peace and security of the world depend.
In While America Sleeps, the authors draw on historical comparisons with the experiences of Great Britain during the interwar years to build the foundation of their thesis. Following the Treaty of Versailles, Britain was in a position similar to that of America following the Cold War. Postured to exert a major international influence, the British instead slashed their military force structure while assuring themselves that conditions of world peace and technological superiority would more than offset any reductions in strength. But, as the authors state, industry failed to maintain the technological advantage and civilian and military planners did not institute the organizational changes necessary to leverage existing technologies into effective weapons of war.
Britain's declining military, itself facing a burgeoning inability to influence major regional competitors, virtually paralyzed foreign policy during the interwar years. In an era that necessitated an active strategy of engagement, the Kagans assert that Great Britain failed to respond to any crises with decisive action, forsaking her responsibilities as the leading global power of the time. Instead, Britain deluded herself with halfhearted claims of "victory" in a series of indecisive political-military engagements with Iraq, Italy, and Turkey. "The sum of these defeats, though portrayed as victories," according to the Kagans, "had a devastating effect on England's positions at the turn of the decade." The world, especially "regional" competitors such as Germany and Japan, began to see that Britain's "bark was far worse than her bite."
America, according to the authors, is already following a similar path of destruction. We have already mortgaged any technological superiority we possess with the assertion that we have assumed a "strategic pause" that essentially compels our military forces to delay necessary modernization for at least a decade. While the nation enjoys a greater economic prosperity than at any time in our history, the military is struggling through an era of "constrained resources." When the time finally arrives for America to call upon her armed forces - as she inevitably will, the authors contend - the cost and the time required to repair the damage will be an near-insurmountable obstacle. The United States may again earn her reputation as a country that routinely loses the "first battle" in a time when we can least afford to suffer defeat.
Politically, the Kagans believe, we are already following Great Britain's policy of "pseudoengagement." Our "victories" in the past decade have been fundamentally delusional, our foreign policy is now in ruins, and any "strategic pause" that may have existed is now past. America has shirked her inherent responsibilities as the world's preeminent power and no other nation can adequately fill that void. Our failure to deter developing threats can only result in an eventual major cataclysm. And, unlike in years past, America is no longer immune to direct attack.
Donald Kagan, the Hillhouse Professor of History and Classics at Yale University and one of America's foremost historians, together with his son, Frederick, a professor of military history at West Point, paint a bleak picture of our nation's ability to influence the international security environment. In developing their thesis, the Kagans successfully illustrate the relevant historical parallels that preceded the last world war and certainly exist today. Their masterful use of historical example only adds credibility to their arguments.
While America Sleeps is a though-provoking treatise on the role of military power in foreign policy. Despite the authors' foreshadowing of impending doom, their major themes are certainly valid and deserve serious professional consideration. Civilian and military leaders alike should heed their advice: the Kagans challenge the distinct lack of will in our political leaders, dispute our supposed technological superiority, warn us against an over reliance on air power, and discredit the fallacy of just-in-time logistics. While America Sleeps is a remarkably insightful book that is at times controversial and disturbing, and one the most thoroughly penetrating studies of American foreign policy recently published.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 19, 2006The Kagans--like many of today's conservative intellectuals who have never served in the military--are conceptually stuck in a century old mold of military power. Their sense of what a standing army can accomplish in defiance of an indigenous population, in the modern world of cheap weapons and undetectable explosives, is misguided. They appear to have no sense of the realistic limitations of modern conventional forces facing well-supplied guerrilla counter-forces.
As the US experience in both Vietnam and Iraq demonstrate clearly, standing armies can not defeat a determined, indigenous, well supplied insurgency. In fact, such an insurgency will almost certainly prevail where the will of the ostensibly more powerful standing army is contingent upon its own domestic, democratic support of the venture.
Unless a standing army can occupy the whole of its territory and bring it to submission 24/7, it can never succeed. The indigenous "enemy" will always flee by day and fight by night and by subterfuge.
Frustrated by the world's present conflicts and threats--which, they fail to acknowledge, pale in comparison to the slaughter, destruction and chaos of WWI and WWII, the Kagans and Neocons seem utterly bent upon forcing the abandonment of post-war enlightened thought and conduct in favor of a return to a state of universal barbarism, the very thing that the ascent of man has sought to overcome.
I have no idea why they would seek to "wake us" from our "sleep" only to confront us with the nightmarish notion that it is somehow America's duty to subdue and conquer wherever in the world we are able to construe that our "interests" are at stake.
Indeed, their philosophy is so antediluvian that one struggles to understand why they seek to take us back to the law of the jungle at the very time the world has reached a state of relative stability. Surely the 9/11 attacks weren't the end of the world, and surely "terrorism" will never defeat our nation or any other nation in the free world, unless it is by internal repression as a result of succumbing to the kind of universal fear preached by the Kagans.
The only conclusion I can reach is that their true motive is to build support for Israeli conduct in the Middle East. They seek to cause America to revert to a mindset of "might makes right," and thus be willing to support even the most extreme measures by Israel to defeat its enemies and to further extinguish Palestinian interests. In short, the Kaganites and the Neocon Straussians all appear to be seeking the perpetual subordination of American interests to those perceived to be Israel's by its ruling right wing. And they are willing to--indeed obliged to--destroy traditional American values in order to achieve this goal.
Sadly and ironically, they fail to grasp the fact that America is and always will be an ardent defender of Israel, provided Israel honors and respects not just the power of hostile surrounding nations, but also the humanity of its repressed Palestinian masses.
In an effort to justify the rampant, "preemptive" injection of US military power into problematic situations, the Kagans would have us believe that modern invading forces can actually accomplish something other than to ignite perpetual hatred of the invader by the invaded.
Eventually such hatreds coalesce to the disadvantage of the invader. And eventually, the invasion fails and an embarrassing withdrawal is inevitable.
That is the true lesson of modern warfare. We have seen it happen time and time again: Japan in Asia, Germany and Italy in Europe and Africa, the US in Vietnam and Iraq, the USSR in Afghanistan, Britain in India, France in Algeria, and so forth.
The Kagans are living in the distant past.

