Buy new:
-44% $9.00$9.00
FREE delivery January 9 - 15
Ships from: bookbiz75 Sold by: bookbiz75
Save with Used - Good
$1.21$1.21
$3.98 delivery January 11 - 14
Ships from: glenthebookseller Sold by: glenthebookseller
Learn more
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror (A World Politics Bestseller) Paperback – Unabridged, September 21, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
With all-new excerpts from Richard Clarke's dramatic public testimony, and revealing corroboration from The 9/11 Commission Report
From the 9/11 Commission Report:
"On the day of the meeting [September 4, 2001], Clarke sent Rice an impassioned personal note. He criticized U.S. counterterrorism efforts past and present. The 'real question' before the principals, he wrote, was 'are we serious about dealing with the al Qida threat?...Is al Qida a big deal?...Decision makers should imagine themselves on a future day when the CSG has not succeeded in stopping al Qida attacks and hundreds of Americans lay dead in several countries, including the US,' Clarke wrote. 'What would those decision makers wish that they had done earlier? That future day could happen at any time.'"
- Print length352 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateSeptember 21, 2004
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.9 x 8.44 inches
- ISBN-109780743260459
- ISBN-13978-0743260459
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Cyber War: The Next Threat to National Security and What to Do About ItPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Wednesday, Jan 8
The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11PaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 7
Your Government Failed You: Breaking the Cycle of National Security DisastersHardcover$6.21 shippingGet it Jan 15 - 16
Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to September 10, 2001PaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 7
The Cold War: A New HistoryPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 7
Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIAPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 7
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book engaging and informative. They praise the writing style as clear and cogent. Readers appreciate the concise history of terrorism during the presidential years and the interesting view of the Bush Administration. The style is enjoyable and well-presented. However, opinions differ on whether it's worth the time or not.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book easy to read and engaging. They describe it as a classic and well-written, though some mention it jumps around in time a bit too much. The book is considered a timely read that tells a good story of what happened before 9/11.
"...He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero. Incredible tale with many interesting revelations...." Read more
"...It reads like a great spy novel. 2. A fascinating look at the history of recent terrorist acts and our responses from the inside. 3...." Read more
"...The book is a gripping read - all the more so because it's fact, not fiction...." Read more
"...be less than accurate, his style of writing is captivating and engaging of the reader...." Read more
Customers find the book informative and engaging. They say it provides an intelligent, concise history of America's intelligence efforts. Readers also mention that the author is knowledgeable on the subject.
"...This despite the fact that Clarke was arguably the most capable, most knowledgeable, best informed, and most accomplished fighter of terrorism in..." Read more
"...-terrorism operative under four US presidents, and here he offers a compelling and revealing narrative of one of the most important periods of our..." Read more
"...following paragraph: "[a]s Americans, it is up to all of us to be well informed and thoughtful, to help out country make the right decisions in this..." Read more
"...It reads like a great spy novel. 2. A fascinating look at the history of recent terrorist acts and our responses from the inside. 3...." Read more
Customers find the book's writing style engaging and intelligent. They describe it as a page-turner that provides a clear and cogent discussion of the harrowing issue of terrorism. The author is described as articulate, competent, and a true hero. While initially the book reads more like a work of fiction, it is detailed and thoughtful, providing a good overview of how presidents dealt with the terrorism threat. Overall, customers consider it one of the best books on the subject ever written.
"...He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero. Incredible tale with many interesting revelations...." Read more
"...Right War, Wrong War. Positives: 1. A well-written page turner of a book from a true insider. It reads like a great spy novel...." Read more
"...the books by Franken and Moore (and others) are valuable tools, well-written and full of good points and information - but this is a book that..." Read more
"...Preface to "Against All Enemies," Clarke does a clear and cogent job of delineating his premise, the parameters of his argument and the limitations..." Read more
Customers find the book provides an interesting and concise history of terrorism during the presidential years. They appreciate its intelligent, concise view of the Bush Administration and impressive description of the inner circle of government. The book is described as a compelling history of four presidents and the War on Terror, with a clear look at national security and counter-terrorism operations.
"...Against All Enemies" is a fascinating book about the recent history of terrorism during the presidential years of Bush senior, Bill Clinton and..." Read more
"...The book is a gripping read - all the more so because it's fact, not fiction...." Read more
"...It provides an intelligent, concise history of America's quite unwilling and unwitting collision with religiously motivated terrorism prior to..." Read more
"...Mr. Clarke's descriptions on persons in the news, like GEN Shelton, seemed real...." Read more
Customers enjoy the book's style and content. They find it well-presented, thoughtful, and interesting with a fascinating historical overview.
"...: "[a]s Americans, it is up to all of us to be well informed and thoughtful, to help out country make the right decisions in this time of testing...." Read more
"...He's an intelligent, thoughtful and dedicated man - he is possessed by a patriotism that sees beyond party lines...." Read more
"...it because of its controversial nature you will miss out on a very well presented and fascinating historical overview...." Read more
"...narrative is full of action, suspense and seemingly gives you an inside look into how our government works at its highest levels, the more I read..." Read more
Customers have differing views on the book's value for money. Some find it credible and reasonable, describing it as a solid document on the issue of Islamic. Others feel the book is unconscionable and not worth the time or cost.
"...together in convenient and well reasoned parcels, so it is a good, solid document on the issue of Islamic terrorism...." Read more
"...this country with arrogance, inept leadership, and a plentitude of unwise decisions most of which have left the United States in a position of being..." Read more
"...He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero. Incredible tale with many interesting revelations...." Read more
"...9. Based on other books that I have read in the past, this book is quite credible and reasonable...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2004...make it this one. I don't make that statement lightly, because I've read several that I consider to be essential reading. There are several things that make Clarke's book so valuable. For one thing, his tone: he doesn't come across as a wild-eyed liberal. I love the writing and work of Al Franken, Michael Moore, Joe Conason, Craig Unger, and others - but as well-written (and in Moore's case, filmed) as their works are, the very zeal with which they pursue their topics is going to keep most conservative thinkers from giving any honest consideration their points of view. Their works are moving and well-researched, and are potentially eye-opening and instructive for those who are of the opinion that the Bush administration is headed down the right (no pun intended, really...!) path - but few people on the Right are actually going to sit down and read any of them and seriously consider what they're saying. Clarke doesn't come across in his book as a Bush-basher for the sake of it - he makes a point of illuminating what he sees as Bush's good points, but he pulls no punches when addressing those areas where he thinks the administration has taken wrong turns in dealing with terrorism.
Clarke has been working in government during the administrations of the last seven presidents, and has worked in the White House under George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. He has dedicated much of his adult life to the service of his country, and in the last few years he has been a leader in the fight against terrorism. He knows what he's talking about - and he knows what consequences lie ahead of our nation if the problem is not addressed head-on, with all of the resources we can muster. He has worked enough over the course of his career with Middle Eastern issues that he knows the region well - and the clarity of his vision and insight are level-headed and resolute. He recognizes the subtleties that are at play beneath the surface of events, as well as the strengths, weaknesses and idiosyncrasies of the various cultures involved. He not only gives the reader a clear picture of the history of the region, and America's relationship with the players (and the consequences of those relationships) - toward the end of the book, he lays out what he sees as vital areas in need of the correct attention of U.S. foreign policy. He knows the value of a strong military, but he also knows that every fight cannot be won, nor every alliance made, at the point of a gun.
Particularly revelatory I thought was Clarke's view of the Clinton presidency. It's his contention that Clinton did a lot more to fight terrorism - and al Qaeda in particular - than is widely known. With all of the media and Congressional attention given to the storms that were generated over Clinton's personal foibles, there's little wonder that much of what he accomplished went by unnoticed by a country whose press seemed to suddenly turn into tabloids in their coverage. Clarke admits to having his doubts about Clinton's resolve, and his willingness to use military force when necessary - but he came away from a number of experiences comforted by the knowledge that the president grasped the significance of the al Qaeda threat as was willing to deal with it. When Bush came into office in 2001, Clarke was shocked and dismayed at the indifference the president's staff seemed to give to the terrorism issue. His impression was that they were mostly stuck in a `Cold War' mentality, unable to comprehend that the direst threat posed to the United States would come not from a nation, but from a group like al Qaeda. Tragically, events would prove him right.
The Right has vilified Clarke - they have attempted to portray him as a disgruntled ex-employee seeking revenge, and they're doing both the author and our country a disservice in the process. I didn't get the slightest impression from this book, nor in any of the interviews with the author, or other appearances that I've caught on television, that Clarke is in any way spiteful or resentful. He's an intelligent, thoughtful and dedicated man - he is possessed by a patriotism that sees beyond party lines. The book is a gripping read - all the more so because it's fact, not fiction. As I mentioned at the first, the books by Franken and Moore (and others) are valuable tools, well-written and full of good points and information - but this is a book that your Right-wing uncle (or other relative, or friend - you know, the one you're always arguing with...?) is more likely to read. It has the potential to open eyes and minds - and our nation could always use more of that.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2004Richard Clarke acted as an anti-terrorism operative under four US presidents, and here he offers a compelling and revealing narrative of one of the most important periods of our lifetime. The book begins with a fascinating chapter that covers the events of September 11th, 2001. Tellingly, Rice leaves Clarke in charge of post-WTC bombing operations, and she goes to the bunker with Mr. and Mrs. Cheney while Clarke and his colleagues stay in the Situation Room, working even as they believe that they will likely be killed in a further attack.
The next chapters discuss events in the Middle East, the rise of terrorism and the American response to terrorist acts during the administrations of Reagan, Bush the elder, Clinton and Baby Bush.
The book documents the distinct responses to terror threats by the Clinton and Bush administrations: Clinton issued an Executive Order in 1995 designed to go after terrorist funding and another in 1998 specifically to go after bin Laden and al Qaeda, tripled the FBI counterterrorism budget, pushed for Saudi cooperation in terrorist investigations, gave major speeches about the threat of terrorism, secured additional funding for counterterrorism, intervened in Bosnia to undermine efforts by bin Laden to establish a foothold in that country, bombed al Qaeda facilities, issued orders to have bin Laden killed, created the Counterterrorism Security Group, reinforced American embassies worldwide, held dozens of Principals meetings, foiled a number of Millennium plots, and asked for a Pol-Mil plan for al Qaeda, which included planning, goals, resources, timelines and responsibilities, and was later given to Condoleeza Rice in January 2001 though it was adopted by the administration until AFTER September 11th. By 1996, knowing that al Qaeda had a presence in over 50 countries, Clinton and his people "were preoccupied with it". Clarke states that "[Clinton] had seen earlier than anyone that terrorism would be the major new threat facing America, and therefore had greatly increased funding for counterterrorism and initiated homeland protection programs." In contrast, during a time of increasing alerts and chatter, George Bush went on vacation. Clarke resigned his post in frustration, and his replacement quit after a few months because the administration was still not going after al Qaeda but was instead concentrating on Iraq and was "using the War on Terror politically". More importantly, they have not been effective in making us safer since 9-11, have weakened our military capabilities, underfunded first responders, reduced civil rights, and squandered the opportunity to unite the American people and build international alliances. While firefighters dug through the rubble of WTC, Bush & Co. were already plotting to use the horrific event for their own political ends.
Prince Bandar, in the news recently due to Bob Woddward's book, makes some interesting appearances here, as do Louis Freeh, George Tenet and many others. The FBI and the Pentagon come off especially badly here, but Clarke also gives a lot of credit to individuals who worked hard on this threat, including FBI agent John O'Neill, the counterterrorism expert who is the subject of Frontline's "The Man Who Knew", an excellent documentary about an agent obsessed with al Qaeda and bin Laden, who quit the FBI in frustration, went to work as head of security in the WTC and was killed on 9-11.
What critics do not give credit for is that Clarke was a government employee who had built a solid 30-year career and who operated behind-the-scenes. He gave up his privacy and his livelihood, knowing full well that the Bush Slime Machine (aka Karl Rove) would try to destroy his character and his life, but he still came forward because he thought this information was so important. Furthermore, his contentions have been corroborated by other insiders. We all owe this man a debt of gratitude for his actions -- before, during and since 9-11.
One thing I've not seen anyone mention is the incredible implication of the title. After dedicating the book to the murder victims of 9-11, Clarke uses the preface to discuss the Constitution. He states that the President, naturalized citizens, bureaucrats, and FBI and CIA agents all take an oath swearing to protect the Constitution "against all enemies". He says that this is our first mission, "not unnecessary wars to test personal theories or expiate personal guilt or revenge. We must also defend the Constitution against those who would use the terrorist threat to assault the liberties the Constitution enshrines . . . It is essential that we prevent further attacks and that we protect the Constitution . . . against all enemies." Wow. So Bush and Cheney and Ashcroft are some of those referred to in the title. And I couldn't agree more. What are we defending if we allow ideologues to change the essential nature of our way of life? if something is wrong, I want someone to step up and point it out, and if I were ever in trouble, I would want Richard Clarke beside me. He is a remarkably brave, competent and articulate individual, and a true hero.
Incredible tale with many interesting revelations. Essential reading. Highest recommendation.
Top reviews from other countries
Yaz YazooReviewed in the United Kingdom on January 14, 20235.0 out of 5 stars Great service
Good reading
denise-wozniakReviewed in Canada on December 18, 20175.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Excellent book. Gives an insider view.
-
mtanaka7Reviewed in Japan on April 30, 20045.0 out of 5 stars 良心的<暴露本>!
<9・11>の1ヶ月前には、米本土に対するテロが実行されることを、ブッシュ政権の中枢は承知していたという事実を「暴露」した、ベストセラーである。<9・11>については、昨年あたり、フランスなどでは「自作自演」説が盛んにもてはやされた。ただ、事の真偽は判定不可能だろうし、「真相」は今後もわかるはずがないだろう。とはいえ、本書が出版され、さらにその後、ターゲットがニューヨークやワシントンであることを示す機密文書も出てきたことから、「やらせ」説が根も葉もないものではなく、少なくとも「グレー」以上の事実であることは間違いないようである。著者自身、本書の出版には相当、心の葛藤があったようである。けれども、<9・11>は世界を一変させた、歴史的な事件である。決して、闇に葬るべきではない。その意味で、著者の良心と勇気を称えたい。
Robert T. HoeckelReviewed in Germany on March 17, 20214.0 out of 5 stars Against All Enemies: Inside America's War on Terror
Started reading the book at a friend's house in Honduras, bought the book from Amazon later and finished reading it at home.
Dave BReviewed in Canada on January 3, 20154.0 out of 5 stars Worth reading, eventually...
This has been sitting on my 'to read' pile long enough that it has become somewhat dated. If you follow this subject area, there won't be many surprises. You really have to read between the lines to get a hint that the 1998 cruise missile strike on the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory may have been a mistake. There were a few tidbits that made it worthwhile for me. If you're looking for an unbiased and thorough assessment of the cost/benefit ratio for security measures during Clarke's time, this isn't it. The editing of the last third could have been tighter as there is too much repetition.


