Learn more
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
State of Denial: Bush at War, Part III Hardcover – September 30, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length576 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSimon & Schuster
- Publication dateSeptember 30, 2006
- Dimensions6.6 x 9.5 x 1.7 inches
- ISBN-100743272234
- ISBN-13978-0743272230
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed


Bush at WarPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 7Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Fear: Trump in the White HousePaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
The Agenda: Inside the Clinton White HouseHardcoverFREE ShippingGet it Jan 7 - 13Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book insightful and informative. They describe it as a well-written, easy-to-read account with an unbiased and honest perspective. Readers praise the author's ability to relate to people and his journalistic skill. However, opinions differ on the governance aspect, with some finding it insightful and interesting while others feel it lacks context.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book insightful and informative. They appreciate the details about the Bush administration's operations and the interesting perspective provided by the author. The book is replete with quotes or references to hours of notes that Mr. Woodward has defended publicly.
"...Now, it is still that but is rapidly becoming good history as well. It is, of course, only a beginning of that history...." Read more
"...It is full of an insider's knowledge and perspective of the workings of government, drops well-known names on every page, and tells a riveting..." Read more
"...of Woodward's books on the presidency, State of Denial is impressive in its detail and masterly in its organization and clear presentation of that..." Read more
"...The book is replete with quotes or references to hours of notes that Mr. Woodward has defended publicly...." Read more
Customers find the book easy to read and engaging. They describe it as a fair account with a genuine feel. Readers consider it an important and powerful work by Mr. Woodward. The book is considered educational and informative on current events.
"...We know why.... Richard Armitage seems wise, honest, and very capable. He speaks fluent Vietnamese as well as several other languages...." Read more
"...When released, it was good reading on current events. Now, it is still that but is rapidly becoming good history as well...." Read more
"...The second target is Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld seems to be very smart, self-confident and hard-working. He also is clearly a micromanager...." Read more
"...The most depressing line in this excellent book was the last sentence: "With all Bush's upbeat talk and optimism, he had not told the American..." Read more
Customers find the writing style well-written and easy to read. They say the book is readable, credible, and well-edited. The author creates vivid visions that help readers understand the corruption.
"...Woodward is astonishingly good as a writer here...." Read more
"...Woodward made it all clear and readable and put it together in a decent prose style...." Read more
"...Well written. Whether it stands the test of time or not, we will see. Highly recommended." Read more
"...It reads as being highly credible and further adds to Woodward's status as a journalistic icon...." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's unbiased and honest writing. They find it informative and factual, providing a true account of the current situation.
"...We know why.... Richard Armitage seems wise, honest, and very capable. He speaks fluent Vietnamese as well as several other languages...." Read more
"...It is as free from bias as anyone could write in the circumstances...." Read more
"...similar books I have devoured, it is meant to be informative and factual...." Read more
"...He's unbiased. He's detailed. He's a true patriot, in that he cares about what's best for the country, not any particular party. Happy Reading!" Read more
Customers appreciate the journalistic quality of the book. They say it's a real accomplishment and a must-read piece of work by a legendary investigative reporter.
"...Overall, this is an excellent journalistic effort. When released, it was good reading on current events...." Read more
"...This is a real journalistic accomplishment, and a must-read piece of work. Sylvia Starr" Read more
"...Even more important than the Watergate Papers. An outstanding book by an outstanding reporter." Read more
"Bob Woodward is one of the finest investigative journalists of our time...." Read more
Customers appreciate the author's ability to relate to people and get them to talk. They also mention that he has a talent for getting people to talk to him.
"...He has proven ability to relate to people and is efficient...." Read more
"...to amaze me that this author continues to have a talent for getting people to talk to him even though he has demonstrated many times that he will..." Read more
"...In any case, he has obviously interviewed many people and has a very good grasp on the reality of what occurred...." Read more
"This book really painted George W. in a likable manner...." Read more
Customers have mixed views on the book's governance. Some find it provides an insider's perspective and context into how the government operates, including policy development and execution. They appreciate the direct quotes and context. However, others criticize egos, incompetence, mismanagement, errors in judgment, and bureaucratic organizations and management approaches.
"...It is full of an insider's knowledge and perspective of the workings of government, drops well-known names on every page, and tells a riveting..." Read more
"...I constantly see in this book are bureaucratic organizations, management approaches, communication issues, cabals, quid pro quos, quashing of dissent..." Read more
"...of secondary source material, direct quotes, and context within which policy was developed and execution of policy was corrupted...." Read more
"...The errors in judgment and management...." Read more
Customers have different views on the book's effectiveness. Some find it a useful reality check for textbook articles, while others feel it points out the dysfunctional administration and its negative impact on ending the conflict.
"...We know why.... Richard Armitage seems wise, honest, and very capable. He speaks fluent Vietnamese as well as several other languages...." Read more
"...This is truly unfortunate and bodes very poorly for an end to this conflict. Woodward is astonishingly good as a writer here...." Read more
"...White House events and in this book, we see another example of his fine work...." Read more
"...The overwhelming thread in this book is the dysfunctionality of this administration...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 28, 2007This book may be helpful for students of organizational psychology in particular and many other academic fields in general. Also, anyone working in any organization can gain insights on what *not* to do by reading "State of Denial."
Obviously, hundreds of reviews and comments on this book have been made already. So this review will attempt to shed light on a few things not mentioned much or at all by this time, if anyone by this point, cares.
What I constantly see in this book are bureaucratic organizations, management approaches, communication issues, cabals, quid pro quos, quashing of dissent, incompetence, cultural and historical ignorance, myopia, and a leader who has little idea of what is going on both within the administration, and the outside world.
However....this is not a negative book. It isn't an indictment against any individual, organization(s), or administration. It simply examines the details and actions of the many figures involved in the American invasion of Iraq in 2003 up to late 2006. And, there are many individuals involved. And there are numerous organizations involved (as stated above). Many personalities, management styles, and inter-agency turf battles exemplify the distrust, cultural ignorance, and egotistical yes-men and women who are considered "the brightest" and most apt for the job.
Coordination between the DoD, NSC, State, CPA, DIA, and Bush administration among others, presents the reader with a myriad of broken cob-webs, miscommunication, intra-agency grudges, individual and organizational scrimmages, inter-agency secrecy and uncoordinated goals. One serious question is: what were the goals? They didn't know then and they don't know now.
Some of the many anecdotes that may keep a reader's interest are:
General Tommy Franks referring to Doug Feith as a "stupid motherxxxxxx. The stupidist motherxxxx I've ever seen." Yet, Feith was one of the top people in charge of Phase IV.
Another person of intrigue is Paul Bremer. How did "Jerry" get the job?
General Eric Shinseki simply answered questions from Senator Carl Levin about the number of troops needed for post-Saddam Iraq at the Armed Services Committee on February 25, 2003. Ivy League career civilians publicly admonished and chastised him. At Shinseki's retirement party, not one civilian showed up. All for telling the truth, when asked a question.
Other interesting tid-bits are, the role of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) and his relationship with civilian "masters."
Title X.
General Dick Meyers "mind-meld" with Rumsfeld.
Admiral Vern Clark's refusal to be selected as Chairman of the JCS.
Condoleeza Rice was not considered a great head of the NSC, and isn't currently considered a great Secretary of State. Why all the attention to this person in the political arena when she has no voting record? We know why....
Richard Armitage seems wise, honest, and very capable. He speaks fluent Vietnamese as well as several other languages. He has proven ability to relate to people and is efficient. He once stated, "never accept a job when you don't know who your boss is going to be," when refusing a high level position.
Colin Powell was indeed fired as Secretary of State.
In "State of Denial" Woodward examines the 'implementation' aspect of this debacle. But as for the cause: the major reason for the American invasion of Iraq was the PNAC.
The American public supported this PNAC charade in the guise of "democracy, freedom," and liberty." Look at history and you'll know it is all about ________. You fill in the blanks.
One critical question I find myself asking is: how can people who are considered the most knowledgeable, most experienced, and smartest, be so incompetent?
This isn't a political question. It's really an organizational question.
This is what American society and every society, should ask themselves about people in leadership positions. They have power over people's lives.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2006Woodward tells an amazing and sad story with this book. Coming at this time, he is able to build on subjects touched by other authors. Within his book, he confirms things from Paul O'Neill's book, Jerry Bremer's book, Dick Clarke's book and several more in writing and researching this one. While there was room for doubt and question about the validity or veracity of the stories told in the original books, perhaps due to an axe to grind or a grudge to settle, the acknowledgment of the same facts by Woodward pretty much debunks the theory that these prior books just fluffed up the truth.
The fact is much more that the White House seems to be the ones doing all the fluffing. The Administration as portrayed by Woodward is clearly incompetent. And the inter and intra communications by and between the cabinets Secretaries is dysfunctional at best and even juvenile at worst.
In discussing the President, Woodward quite clearly indicates that Mr. Bush has not revealed the truth on so many things about the war and related issues that it would be hard to list them all. The biggest deception seems clearly to be that the state of our progress in Iraq has been hugely overstated. The fact is that the conditions in Iraq are significantly worse than under Saddam. Provision of basic services such as electricity, clean water and even gasoline ironically are at such a poor level, the Administration will not even reveal the truth. And despite anything the President or the White House might say, the insurgency is clearly on the rise and getting stronger. The consistency, volume and mode of daily attacks on US troops just continues to climb or stay at very high levels. The month of October 2006 was the 4th most deadly month of the war, and yet the Administration is clearly in denial about this condition and surely is under cover with respect to communicating this to the public.
It is unfortunate that with this state of our leadership we find ourselves with just over two more years to endure, before we can change to another Administration. This one clearly has no plan or exit strategy from Iraq. Any useful solutions or potential resolutions are tossed off as unacceptable by the President. Nothing short of Henry Kissinger's total victory in Iraq seems to be satisfactory to the President. This is truly unfortunate and bodes very poorly for an end to this conflict.
Woodward is astonishingly good as a writer here. At perhaps his very best, he has sourced material that no other human being seems to have been able to get their hands on. But Woordward was able to do so. His ingenuity and resourcefulness as a reporter are all showcased in this amazing portrayal of the Bush II Administration and their conduct with respect to the war in Iraq. All informed Americans should take the time to read this book.
Top reviews from other countries
Amazon CustomerReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 26, 20175.0 out of 5 stars Excellent
It is as good as new. Delivered without delay
Ygouf de VareseReviewed in France on October 22, 20155.0 out of 5 stars Invited at the heart of power
Very professional investigation and subtle analysis, Bob Wodward is a perceptive witness of Bush's presidency, who invite us at the heart of the power
Amazon CustomerReviewed in the United Kingdom on February 10, 20165.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Perfect
Mairead ryanReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 20, 20134.0 out of 5 stars Read this Bok and weep about your government
Gives us a great insight into the dysfunctionality of Whitehouse relationships and how they contributed to the utter mess that was being played out in Iraq at the time. Condoleza Rice comes out of the mess looking like she learned something and probably wishes she had never left academia. Not to have provided the military personnel on the ground with interpreters was criminal in itself and demonstrates the contempt with which the Iraqi's were treated. Imagine having your home searched by people who cant communicate with you or understand what you are trying to tell them. " Man has been to the moon but that is nowhere in terms of how much he needs to learn about himself" to misquote Anais Nin.
-
E. HoefReviewed in France on January 31, 20092.0 out of 5 stars Woodward "oublie" de parler de l'organisation mercenaire "Blackwater"
Comme beaucoup de journalistes/politologues ou historiens américain Bob ward "occulte" complètementl'organisation mercenaire "Blackwater" qui travaille pour le compte des USA. Qui sont imunisés à 100° de toute poursuite pour actes illicites ou crimes de guerre! Pas un mot non plus de l'influence des lobby's israeliens aux états-unis.



