Buy new:
$19.00$19.00
FREE delivery: Tuesday, Feb 14 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon.
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: JACARANDA TRADE
Buy Used: $14.46
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
+ $3.99 shipping
85% positive over last 12 months
Usually ships within 2 to 3 days.
FREE Shipping

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.


Patient H.M.: A Story of Memory, Madness, and Family Secrets Paperback – May 2, 2017
Price | New from | Used from |
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial |
Audio CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $11.90 | $8.75 |

Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Enhance your purchase
Winner of the PEN/E.O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Award • Los Angeles Times Book Prize Winner
NAMED ONE OF THE BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR BY
The Washington Post • New York Post • NPR • The Economist • New York • Wired • Kirkus Reviews • BookPage
In 1953, a twenty-seven-year-old factory worker named Henry Molaison—who suffered from severe epilepsy—received a radical new version of the then-common lobotomy, targeting the most mysterious structures in the brain. The operation failed to eliminate Henry’s seizures, but it did have an unintended effect: Henry was left profoundly amnesic, unable to create long-term memories. Over the next sixty years, Patient H.M., as Henry was known, became the most studied individual in the history of neuroscience, a human guinea pig who would teach us much of what we know about memory today.
Patient H.M. is, at times, a deeply personal journey. Dittrich’s grandfather was the brilliant, morally complex surgeon who operated on Molaison—and thousands of other patients. The author’s investigation into the dark roots of modern memory science ultimately forces him to confront unsettling secrets in his own family history, and to reveal the tragedy that fueled his grandfather’s relentless experimentation—experimentation that would revolutionize our understanding of ourselves.
Dittrich uses the case of Patient H.M. as a starting point for a kaleidoscopic journey, one that moves from the first recorded brain surgeries in ancient Egypt to the cutting-edge laboratories of MIT. He takes readers inside the old asylums and operating theaters where psychosurgeons, as they called themselves, conducted their human experiments, and behind the scenes of a bitter custody battle over the ownership of the most important brain in the world.
Patient H.M. combines the best of biography, memoir, and science journalism to create a haunting, endlessly fascinating story, one that reveals the wondrous and devastating things that can happen when hubris, ambition, and human imperfection collide.
“An exciting, artful blend of family and medical history.”—The New York Times
*Kirkus Reviews (starred review)
- Print length480 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRandom House Trade Paperbacks
- Publication dateMay 2, 2017
- Dimensions5.19 x 0.97 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100812982525
- ISBN-13978-0812982527
Frequently bought together
- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“In prose both elegant and intimate, and often thrilling, Patient H.M. is an important book about the wages not of sin but of science. It is deeply reported and surprisingly emotional, at times poignant, at others shocking. . . . A scintillating book, infused with humanity.”—The Washington Post
“Spellbinding . . . The fact that Dittrich looks critically at the actual process of scientific investigation is just one of the things to admire about Patient H.M.”—The New York TimesBook Review
“Astonishingly insightful . . . A fascinating story in its own right to anyone interested in the history of modern science’s attempts to understand the causes of mental illness along with the many botched attempts to treat it . . . [Patient H.M.] is indeed about memory, madness, and family secrets and, in that sense, about the paths that shape the core of the self, in each and every one of us.”—Psychology Today
“Beautifully told . . . a book that will rank with Rebecca Skloot’s The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks in the realm of outstanding medical ethics narratives.”—Associated Press
“Dittrich’s account raises entirely new questions about the way in which the research on H.M. was conducted—and about the conclusions that have long been incorporated into our understanding of memory.”—New York Magazine
“Remarkable.”—Wired
“Oliver Sacks meets Stephen King in a piercing study of one of psychiatric medicine’s darker hours. . . . A mesmerizing, maddening story and a model of journalistic investigation.”—Kirkus Reviews (starred review)
“At the heart of this breathtaking work . . . is [Luke] Dittrich’s story of his complicated grandfather, his mentally ill grandmother, and a long-held family secret, with Molaison stranded ‘where the past and the future were nothing but indistinct blurs.’”—Publisher’s Weekly (starred review)
“The machinations of scientists and researchers—their personality and ambition, power and hubris—are of equally vital (and cautionary) importance in Dittrich’s unusual and compelling mix of science and family history.”—Booklist (starred review)
“Patient H.M. tells one of the most fascinating and disturbing stories in the annals of medicine, weaving in ethics, philosophy, a personal saga, the history of neurosurgery, the mysteries of human memory, and an exploration of human ego. A monumental contribution to our understanding of medical research, and of ourselves, Patient H.M. is sweeping, meticulous, and seamless—with an ending that, like the best of scientific investigations, challenges everything that came before it.”—Sheri Fink, M.D., Pulitzer Prize winner and author of Five Days at Memorial
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Fall
In the northeast corner of Colt Park, in downtown Hartford, Connecticut, a ten-foot-tall bronze statue of the park’s namesake rose from a granite pedestal. Engraved tributes to Samuel Colt, inventor of the Colt .45, covered one side of the pedestal, but the boy trudging toward it wouldn’t have been able to read them even if he’d wanted to, since he wasn’t wearing his glasses. It was dinnertime, July 3, and it was probably 1933 or 1934, though the exact year would be one of the things that scientists would argue about in the decades to come. His family’s second-floor walk-up apartment was about a quarter mile away. He was seven or eight years old and already he’d moved at least five times. His father was an electrician, didn’t make much money, had to go wherever the work was. It must have been confusing sometimes for the boy, all these homes flashing by, all those fresh starts. He had blond hair and bright blue eyes and a sweet, uncertain smile.
A steep road skirted the northern edge of the park, and if the boy cut across it and down some backstreets, he could shave a little time off his walk home. The boy’s eyesight may have been bad, but there was nothing wrong with his ears. He didn’t hear any cars coming. He stepped off the sidewalk and started crossing the road.
The bicyclist, coasting down the hill, didn’t see Henry until it was too late.
•••
Hippocrates Asclepiades, a Greek physician born on the island of Cos in the fourth century b.c., is widely regarded as the father of modern medicine. Although his last name indicates a claimed family connection to Asclepius, the revered doctor-god of Greek myth, Hippocrates became famous by advancing the revolutionary argument that the gods had no place in medicine. Healers of one sort or another have existed for as long as humans have, but Hippocrates was one of the first to reject the magic and spiritualism and religion that most who came before him relied on. Instead he attempted to localize the sources of our ailments in our physical environment and inside our bodies themselves.
That approach was well illustrated in an essay he wrote called “On the Sacred Disease.” The title was a little misleading, since Hippocrates preferred to call the disease in question by a different name: epilepsy, from the Greek epilambanein, which means “to seize.” And the disease of epilepsy, he wrote, was “no more divine than others; but it has its nature such as other diseases have, and a cause whence it originates.” He criticized the “conjurors, purificators, mountebanks, and charlatans” who used “divinity as a pretext and screen of their own inability to afford any assistance,” and he ridiculed them for blaming the gods for the various ways epilepsy manifested itself in their patients: “For, if they imitate a goat, or grind their teeth, or if their right side be convulsed, they say that the mother of the gods is the cause. But if they speak in a sharper and more intense tone, they resemble this state to a horse, and say that Poseidon is the cause. Or if any excrement be passed, which is often the case, owing to the violence of the disease, the appellation of Enodia is adhibited; or if it be passed in smaller and denser masses, like a bird’s, it is said to be from Apollo Nomius. But if foam be emitted by the mouth, and the patient kick with his feet, Ares then gets the blame.”
After rejecting all the sacred explanations, Hippocrates presented a startling explanation of his own: “The brain is the cause of this affection,” he wrote, “as it is of other very great diseases, and in what manner and from what cause it is formed, I will now plainly declare.”
The details of Hippocrates’s subsequent explanation of the aetiology of epilepsy, of course, haven’t stood the test of time. In his view, the brain was a pneumatic organ, alternately pulsing with phlegm and bile. It was delicately attuned to the winds, and the wrong wind blowing on the wrong person at the wrong time could wreak havoc. If the west wind buffeted a constitutionally phlegmatic child, for example, it might cause the child’s brain to temporarily “melt,” at which point epileptic fits would occur. Hippocrates’s prescription for such children would be to shield them from the west wind and expose them instead to the north wind, which would, presumably, recongeal their brains and set them right.
What’s important about Hippocrates isn’t that he figured out epilepsy’s origins or its treatment—he did neither—but that he began looking in the right place: not up to the heavens or Mount Olympus but into the even more mysterious terrain inside our skulls.
In the years since, many doctors grappling with the problem of epilepsy followed Hippocrates’s lead, venturing deeper and deeper into the brain, seeking a secular understanding of the “sacred disease.”
By the early 1930s, when a bicyclist knocked down a young boy on a street in Hartford, Connecticut, they’d begun to find some answers.
Let’s imagine ourselves inside Henry’s skull.
Let’s imagine the moment after the bicycle hit him and before he hit the ground, when he was neither standing nor lying down but was instead floating through the air.
His brain was floating, too. It was nestled in a warm pool of cerebrospinal fluid, while vivid sensations of every sort coursed through it. The pain from wherever the bicycle impacted him, the shards of scenery as he was knocked off his feet, the view of the fast-approaching ground, the sound of his own involuntary gasp, the feel of his wavy hair ruffling as he fell through the air—all of these sensations and more were relaying from the nerves in his retinas, his auditory canals, his skin, his vestibular balance system, and buffeting his brain, which processed them into the multidimensional stew we experience as in-the-moment consciousness.
Now let’s imagine the impact.
Henry landed on the left side of his head, hard enough to tear a deep inch-long gash in his forehead just above his eyebrow. His brain then experienced what are known as torsional forces—that is, forces that caused it to twist inside his skull, in this case from left to right. At the same time, it sloshed forward in its watery womb, pushing up against the thin membrane of the pia mater and the thicker membranes of the arachnoid and dura mater, its weight compressing them all until it crashed against the unyielding barrier of his skull. His brain deformed. It changed shape exactly like a rubber ball does when it hits a hard surface, and then rebounded. If it was moving fast enough, if the rebound was strong enough, it again compressed the various layers of insulation that usually kept it safe, this time on the opposite side of his skull. This second impact would have been somewhat less violent than the first. And if it rebounded again, to make a third transit, it would be moving even more slowly. Within a second, it stopped its bouncing. The force of the impact dissipated, and Henry’s brain was again floating serenely in its warm pool of cerebrospinal fluid.
But the damage was already done.
During that first concussive impact and its immediate aftermath, as Henry’s brain twisted and compressed and rebounded, various things happened. Some of these things were physical and easy to understand. Neurons and glial cells—the stuff our brains are made of—were torn and ruptured. Other things that happened inside Henry’s brain, in that violent moment, were chemical and electrical and harder to explain. For reasons that are still poorly understood, when a brain experiences a combination of torsional forces and blunt-force impact, like Henry’s brain experienced, local clusters of neurons open up their floodgates in lockstep synchrony. Bursts of electricity surge down axons—the slender filaments that stretch out from each neuron—and trigger the release of neurotransmitters at their tips. These neurotransmitters bridge the synapses between the ends of the axons and the waiting dendrites of other nearby neurons, causing those neurons to trigger their own bursts of electricity. Eventually, the growing tsunami of neurotransmitters creates an overwhelming surge of brain activity. Whatever sensations and thoughts were inhabiting Henry’s brain prior to this moment—the fear, the pain, the confusion—were wiped out by this burst of activity. Which means that, much like a power surge knocks out a computer, it knocked Henry out.
For five minutes, nothing. Henry’s brain carried on with its usual autonomic, life-regulating tasks, but wherever his consciousness resided was temporarily shut down.
Then, slowly, he came back online.
He opened his eyes. The world came flooding in again, the bustle and noise of downtown Hartford, the voices of a gathering crowd, the pain from the gash in his forehead, the sticky warmth of the blood flowing down his face: The steady march of experience and sensation resumed.
He was back, but he was not the same.
The next day was the Fourth of July, and Henry went to a picnic with his family. It was perfect weather for it: warm, no rain. His forehead had been stitched up, and there was a bandage above his left eye. People joked with him about it, asking if he’d been playing with firecrackers.
“You must have been up early and got at it,” somebody said.
Henry laughed.
He seemed fine.
He felt fine.
Soon, though, the seizures began.
While the exact origins of Henry’s epilepsy can never be known for sure, many scientists believe that it was related to his fall. It could have been the direct physical damage: When brain injuries heal, the scars left behind have a tendency to become epileptogenic, meaning they can generate epileptic seizures. There’s also a theory known as the kindling effect, which holds that the sort of short-circuiting Henry’s brain underwent leaves a new circuit in its wake, a dangerously convulsive circuit, one that grows more active over time, kindling a fiercer and fiercer blaze.
The seizures were minor at first. Little instants of inattention. Dazed moments, small absences.
Still, the seed had been planted, and Henry’s transformation into Patient H.M., the most studied individual in the history of neuroscience, had begun.
That’s his real name: Henry.
I can even give it to you complete: Henry Gustave Molaison.
There was a time I couldn’t. It was a secret.
For almost six decades, the scientists who studied Henry kept his name hidden away. When they wrote about him they were always careful not to reveal too much, for fear that outsiders might find him, and they were successful. There wasn’t a single paper, out of the hundreds that chronicled in great detail the experiments performed on Henry during the fifty-five years between his operation and his death, that contained anything but the vaguest biographical information about Henry himself.
If you happened to read a lot of these papers, you could have pieced together a fragmentary portrait: One might have mentioned that he had relatives in Louisiana. Another that he was born in 1926. A third that his father’s name was Gustave. A fourth that he was an only child.
And so on.
But most of his story, starting with that most basic fact of his name, was a tightly guarded mystery to the outside world.
•••
Henry Gustave Molaison was born in Manchester, Connecticut, on February 26, 1926.
Two twenty-six, twenty-six.
“ ’Least it’s easy enough to remember,” he often told the scientists with a laugh.
They prodded him for his birth date over and over, sometimes five, six, seven times during a single session, and though he never remembered the previous time they’d asked him, the correct answer always came tumbling out intact: two twenty-six, twenty-six.
Other questions had less consistent answers.
“Henry,” a scientist asked him one afternoon, about fifteen years after the experiments began, “could you once more describe a little your earliest memory, very early in your life, when you were very small, the very first thing?”
“Well, gee,” Henry said. “There is a jumble right there.”
He paused. He was sitting in a laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, though he didn’t know that, and when the scientists had earlier asked where he thought he was, he guessed that he might be in Canada.
“Sort of,” he continued, “to pinpoint, put them right down in a . . .”
Henry paused again. He was smoking a cigarette.
“Find the one that comes before or after,” he said. He had a soft, gentle voice with a thick New England accent. You could almost hear the thoughts whirring inside as he reached back, deep into his childhood. That time, his earliest memory was of a place. A little blue house the Molaison family once lived in.
Another time, during the same session, responding to the same question, he described a person.
“I can think of my grandfather,” he said. “Walking with him. I was very, very small. I think of, uh, well, right off I thought of a tall man, but he isn’t, wasn’t, tall. Medium-size. Not heavy-built. I always think of him in a gray suit. . . . He looked entirely different than my father did, of course. . . . He was, uh, I think of about five-eight.”
“Your father?” the scientist asked.
“Grand,” Henry corrected. “Grandfather. Because my father was almost exactly six foot, just had, oh, a quarter part of an inch or so to go, and he’d be six foot.”
“How tall are you?” the scientist asked.
“I think of six-two right off.”
“Pretty tall,” the scientist said.
“Yes, I know I’m taller than my father,” Henry said.
“Is your father still alive?” the scientist asked.
Henry thought about the question for a few moments before answering. “There I have an argument with myself. Right off, I think that he is. And then I have the argument, of course, that I think that he has been called.”
“You’re not sure?” the scientist said.
“I’m not sure,” Henry said. “Can’t put my finger, well, definitely on it.” He paused again before continuing. “He is and he isn’t.”
The scientist made a note of this—Henry’s father had died three years before—and then asked once again for his earliest memory.
“Now, Henry, I want you to go back as far as you can, and I want you to try to tell me what you think is your very first, earliest childhood memory, the memory which you think comes before any other.”
“Well, I can go back to, uh, taking a sleigh ride for the first time. . . .”
He described being on Spruce Street, in Manchester, Connecticut, midwinter. He remembered the sleigh being pulled by a single horse. He thought the sleigh and horse belonged to the father of playmates of his, two brothers, Frankie and Jimmie. As he told the story, he picked up the pace, added more details, lost himself in the memory. The horse was on its way to a stable to be reshod. Frankie and Jimmie and Henry were nestled warmly in the back. Some other local kids, seeing them go by, threw snowballs, but the walls of the sleigh kept them safe.
Product details
- Publisher : Random House Trade Paperbacks; Reprint edition (May 2, 2017)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0812982525
- ISBN-13 : 978-0812982527
- Item Weight : 11.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.19 x 0.97 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #765,794 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #913 in History of Medicine (Books)
- #1,599 in Medical Professional Biographies
- #3,326 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
But I see other emotions about Dittrich's grandfather. Confusion, pride for what Scoville did right, acknowledgement of his foibles, and some love maybe leftover from when Dittrich was a child, and looked up to this man. None of us have absolutely perfect fathers or grandfathers, but we still often have mixed feelings about them when we grow older.
What really bothered me was the attitude not just of Scoville towards others, but so many of that generation. I'm boggled at the idea that they were still doing lobotomies in the 1970's, but it didn't surprise me. They were still sterilizing people like me who were disabled (I'm Deaf) in the 1970's. Eugenics was alive and well even then, and what's scary is the powers that be in politics, are working to make eugenics come back. Besides that, all the talk of implants in people for whatever reason, raise all kinds of bioethical flags.
This is absolutely required reading if you want to know about HM. I actually think I was less mad about Scoville who gave Henry his condition of memory loss, than I was at the female psychiatrist who destroyed records on what they did to him, and took back his brain from whom they asked to slice his brain into something they could study...because the man obviously had another lesion which Scoville didn't do. All so she could protect her blasted reputation. That isn't science, and if she's still alive, she should be removed from her position, and probably have her license taken away from her. Totally bad behavior on the part of a scientist in the US. We hold our science to a lot higher level...and she broke all the boundaries of decent behavior!
Of the many hundreds of books I've read over a great many years, this one happens to stand out as one of the 10 or so best I've ever read. This is partly because the book matches up with my interests and experiences, but most of the credit is due to the talent of the author to deliver the goods on a topic for which he is uniquely qualified to write about. His willingness to reveal and speak honestly about the behavior and decisions of a member of his own family and close friends of the family in how they handled the ethics of treating humans essentially as unwitting lab animals is extraordinary.
It seemed obvious to me that the author, Luke Dittrich, was emotionally and intellectually engaged in writing this book.
Of special note is Mr. Dittrich's commendable ability to distill relatively complex anatomical and medical topics into understandable layman's terms, while staying true to what those technical representations are actually describing. I myself had a pneumoencephalogram diagnostic test performed on me over 45 years ago to probe the possibility of a suspected brain tumor. Those were the pre-CAT scan and Pre-MRI scan days. The test was a gosh-awful, inhumane, abusive test. None of the people administering the test on me appeared to have a clue as to how it felt for me to undergo that test. I dearly wish that they had the opportunity to read the couple of detailed pages that Mr. Dittrich devotes to relating what that experience is like. Mr. Dittrich does a similarly riveting job of explaining a variety of other technical things and concepts throughout the book.
He lays out the facts for the reader and allows the reader to develop his/her own conclusions about what they would have done if faced with the same ethical dilemmas characterizing the patient, H.M., both in life and after that life became a scientific afterlife that - of course - has now taken on a life of its own. The entire story is full of intrigue, justifiable outrage, and leaves room for plenty of speculation about what you would have done in the same circumstances.
Get a hold of the book. Read it. But, most importantly, think about what you have read. Digest it. Discuss it. Delight in the experience.
Top reviews from other countries



Muy buen libro para quien pertenece al mundo de las neurociencias


The author’s relationship to William Scoville, the neurosurgeon who performed the temporal-lobe resection on H.M. – Dittrich is Scoville’s grandson – is explored via intimate details of his family’s history. The book provides some important insights into what led to the surgery on H.M., although some mysteries and enigmas still remain (e.g., did Scovile perform a lobotomy on his own wife, Dittrich’s grandmother?). And it presents a fascinating and in some ways disturbing history of the events and players in this medical/scientific drama. For example, Dittrich describes at length a scientific dispute between the neuroanatomist Jacopo Annese, who performed the exquisite postmortem dissection of H.M.’s brain, and Suzanne Corkin, the MIT neuropsychologist who had studied H.M. for many decades. According to Dittrich, Corkin was extremely reluctant to share information about H.M., and he describes how Corkin and Annese were collaborators and then antagonists over the analysis and interpretation of Annese’s anatomical work on H.M.’s brain. Corkin had even managed to secure ownership of H.M.’s brain for MIT, and Dittrich documents the questionable justification for this. Corkin also told the author that she had destroyed decade’s worth of records of interviews with and unpublished studies of H.M., a disturbing revelation of behavior that, to me at least, is unethical and borders on scholarly misconduct. In any case, in its description of the lobotomizing crusader Scoville, who really was a cowboy as far as adhering to medical ethics is concerned, and of the unbridled competitiveness and wrangles that occurred around access to and testing of H.M. in subsequent years, the book illustrates how ego and excessive ambition can adversely affect scientific progress.
An excerpt from the book published in the Magazine of the Sunday NY Times was centered primarily on the dispute between Corkin and Annese, and this led me to the concern that sufficient recognition had not been given to Brenda Milner, who was Corkin’s graduate supervisor at McGill University and who initially performed the seminal and revolutionary research characterizing and exploring H.M.’s memory deficits. Upon reading the whole book, however, I was relieved to find that Dittrich gives full credit to Milner’s insight, ingenuity, and brilliance in first alerting neuroscience to H.M.’s profound deficit in memory. Incidentally, Milner’s research transformed the field by identifying a critical role for the hippocampus and other nearby structures in the formation of long-term memories, and it set the stage for research performed by O’Keefe, Moser, and Moser that identified the participation of the hippocampus in forming spatial memories and led to those researchers receiving Nobel prizes in 2014. It is therefore puzzling to me that Milner’s fundamental contributions have not also been recognized by the Nobel Academy.
Some readers have objected to the style of the book, in which Dittrich employs flashbacks and personal vignettes to tell his story. But these devices enhance the readability and the suspense of the book, in my opinion, and make it more accessible to the non-specialist. My reservations about the book are different. For one, Dittrich offers an extended discussion of the gruesome experiments performed by the Nazis on human subjects, resulting in the development of the Nuremberg code for ethical research after WW II. The implication seems to be that the neurosurgeons who performed lobotomies (presumably including temporal lobe resections, as in H.M.’s case) were conducting unethical research on their patients, research akin to the activities of the Nazis. However, neurosurgeons are of course operating on people as a clinical intervention intended to benefit them, with research as a secondary purpose. There was no such clinical or therapeutic purpose in the activities on the Nazis. For another, at one point Dittrich also seems to dismiss the relevance of brain research on animals, with the erroneous justification that what we learn from animals cannot be applied to human beings (who are of course animals, but animals of a different stripe). In contrast, there are numerous examples of findings about the brain in animals being confirmed in human beings. See for example O’Keefe’s discovery of place cells in the hippocampus of rats and the subsequent observation of increased volume of the hippocampus in people who have undergone spatial training to become London cabbies. But these are really minor quibbles and do not detract from the value of the book.
Altogether, the book is a must read for anyone interested in the neurobiology of memory and the history of modern neuroscience.