Included with a Kindle Unlimited membership.

Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime

FREE delivery: Sunday, July 25 on orders over $25.00 shipped by Amazon. Details

Fastest delivery: Friday, July 23
Order within 14 hrs and 41 mins Details

In Stock.
As an alternative, the Kindle eBook is available now and can be read on any device with the free Kindle app.

$$19.95 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details

Ships from	Amazon.com
Sold by	Amazon.com

Details

Ships from

Amazon.com

Sold by

Amazon.com

Return policy: This item is returnable

Add a gift receipt for easy returns

$3.98 delivery: July 21 - 26

Fastest delivery: Thursday, July 22

Used: Very Good | Details

Sold by glenthebookseller

Other Sellers on Amazon

$15.00
+ $4.49 shipping

Sold by: lambrevsbooks

$22.18
+ $3.99 shipping

Sold by: KnowledgePond

Flip to back Flip to front

Listen Playing... Paused You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more

See all 2 images

Follow the Authors

Kevin Barrett

John Andrew Morrow

ANOTHER French False Flag?: Bloody Tracks from Paris to San Bernardino Paperback – January 6, 2016

by Dr. Kevin J. Barrett (Author), David Dees (Illustrator), Anthony Freda (Illustrator)

20 ratings

See all formats and editions

Price

New from

Used from

Kindle

"Please retry"

$9.99

—

Paperback

"Please retry"

$19.95

$15.00

$3.98

Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 1 million more titles $9.99 to buy
Paperback
$19.95

8 Used from $3.98 4 New from $15.00

Were the "terrorist attacks" in Paris and San Bernardino false flag operations? Most of this book's 26 contributors say "yes." Though the government, academy, and mainstream media are afraid to explore the evidence, these 26 leading public intellectuals - including former high-level government officials, professors, and journalists - fearlessly explain how and why our own governments are slaughtering us in horrific terror events set up to be falsely blamed on "radical Muslim" patsies. From the Pentagon's "Operation Gladio," a US military program which orchestrated almost all of the high-profile "terrorist attacks" during the Cold War, to the post-9/11 era, abundant evidence indicates that most terrorism is created by governments and falsely blamed on their enemies. The motive: Roll back freedom, promote authoritarian leadership, and prepare the public for war. In this book, former CIA counter-terrorism officers Philip Giraldi and Robert David Steele, leading economic advisor to President Reagan Paul Craig Roberts, and two dozen other top analysts question the official stories of what happened in Paris on 11/13/15 and in San Bernardino on 12/2/15. This book was published on the first anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. It follows on the heels of We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo! Free Thinkers Question the French 9/11, which garnered praise from 9/11 researcher leader David Ray Griffin, international law professor Richard Falk, and former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer, among other luminaries. ANOTHER French False Flag, and We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo, have pioneered a new genre: “Open-Source Intelligence” projects that expose big false flags shortly after they happen. Why is this necessary? Normally, false flags are designed so that the Official Story is hammered deep into the public mind in the immediate aftermath of the event, when people are in a state of shock and susceptible to mass hypnosis. If critics wait too long to express a skeptical view, it will fall on deaf ears. So if we want to win the “infowar” by spreading the truth, we need to act as quickly as possible. These books do that. ANOTHER French False Flag is a monument to free speech in a time of cowardice and censorship (especially self-censorship). Editor Kevin Barrett has been attacked indirectly by French President François Hollande in anti-conspiracy-theory tirades, and named as one of the five most dangerous “conspiracy intellectuals” in the world by Hollande’s think tank, the Jean Jaurés Institute. That hasn’t stopped Barrett from repeatedly flying to Paris to give interviews (in French) and participate in conferences in which he tells the French people that it is Hollande’s government and its foreign allies—NOT “radical Muslims”—who have been mass-murdering them in their streets, offices, stadiums, cafés and nightclubs. ANOTHER French False Flag and its predecessor We Are NOT Charlie Hebdo are the most important books the truth movement has produced since the 2002 – 2005 period that gave us the seminal works of Thierry Meyssan, Nafeez Ahmed, David Ray Griffin, and Webster Tarpley. As former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer says, “Today’s Western governments and mainstream media are not trustworthy. If you want the truth, you need to read books like this."

Print length

336 pages
Language

English
Publication date

January 6, 2016
Dimensions

6 x 0.76 x 9 inches
ISBN-10

0996143017
ISBN-13

978-0996143011
See all details

Customers who bought this item also bought

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Thierry Meyssan
26
Paperback
20 offers from $19.73

Get everything you need

Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1

Thierry Meyssan
26
Paperback
20 offers from $19.73

Special offers and product promotions

Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now

Editorial Reviews

About the Author

Kevin Barrett, an American Muslim and PhD Islamic Studies scholar, is one of America's best-known critics of the War on Terror. He has authored and edited several books and appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other mainstream publications. A former teacher of French, Arabic, Islamic Studies, Humanities and other subjects at colleges and universities in Paris, the San Francisco Bay Area, and Wisconsin, he currently works as a talk radio host, nonprofit organizer, editor at Veterans Today, and pundit at Press TV, Russia Today, al-Etejah and other international channels. His website is TruthJihad.com.

Start reading ANOTHER French False Flag? on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Sifting and Winnowing Books; 1st edition (January 6, 2016)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 336 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0996143017
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0996143011
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.19 pounds
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.76 x 9 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #2,301,167 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #299,519 in History (Books)

Customer Reviews:
20 ratings

Customer reviews

5 star		80%
4 star 0% (0%)		0%
3 star 0% (0%)		0%
2 star		13%
1 star		7%

How are ratings calculated?

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

John Neal Spangler

packed with info

Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2019

Verified Purchase

Many different views of the Nov 2015 Paris false flag attacks, including contrary views. many contributors from different angles. some the details, others the philosophy about why and the perp's motives. An important book.

Helpful

James L. Hufferd

The Book Heralds a New Paradigm

Reviewed in the United States on May 14, 2016

Verified Purchase

The book above named is a marvelous anthology of 28 all-star thinkers’ reflections (notably, Paul Craig Roberts, Mujahid Kamran, A.K. Dewdney, Barry Martinez, Nick Kollerstrom, Henry Makow, Stephen Lendman, etc., etc.) on the notorious terrorist attacks in Paris and other places over the past two years, their authorship, inspiration, and meaning, for the most part concluding that the attacks were staged and prosecuted by the powers that be, not by organizations or networks of Muslim terrorists. All but two of the essays argue that position. The reason this writing is dubbed a “sort of” review is that I have not attempted to characterize separately each of the 28 essays, since to do so adequately would require 28 reviews.

Instead, I have eschewed such an exhaustive review, in favor of an evaluation of what I consider the book’s core exchange, the outstandingly-productive debate between the main proposition’s two detractors, Gilad Atzmon and Eric Walberg, and the lead protagonist of the central thesis, Dr. Kevin Barrett, the work’s deft organizer, in a triad of chapters placed near the end of the book.

Atzmon and Walberg essentially argue, completely without recourse to details of the evidence of the false-flag nature and role of the various related terrorist operations, as laid out in the opening twenty-three signature essays, that a false-flag op in any particular case of terrorism, whether postulating Mossad involvement or not, would be too complex and involve too many players and coordination too intricate involving diverse factions, to be plausible as an explanation.

The obvious primary answer to this has to be that whatever lay behind the phenomena of the attacks would have to be complex, so complexity doesn’t at all preclude false-flag authorship or sponsorship. And since the different manifestations (Paris1, Paris2, San Bernardino, and afterward Brussels) are indisputably all linked in a series, what is really rife for exploration is a landscape of causation, not singular events. Rather, a set-up in place of whatever sort is fairly obviously involved, productive of a whole landscape constituted of a sequence of linked events materializing one upon another upon another… day-in, day-out as is deemed necessary. And, as far as states doing this, rather than autonomous terror organizations, or postulated “networks”: if the visible portion and workings of modern super-states are labyrinthian by nature, then why not their corresponding portions intended to be covert? We know that such exist. And if secretive modern states with the means and capability did not in fact operate to manipulate events and outcomes routinely in what they see as their favor, they would most assuredly be missing a golden opportunity.

The opening twenty-three essays in this most-impressive cavalcade effectively compile and apply evidence that the Paris2 attacks were in fact internally generated by agencies of the U.S. and allied states. They indicate convincingly that the prime motive of the attacks was to scare and convince soft European allies of the U.S., both their officials and their populations, in order to strongly reinforce in action their will and allegiance to fulfilling U.S. Mideast and beyond war aims. Also involved in the likely calculation would be aligned aggressive policies aimed at Russia, Central Asia, etc. This book, in the vanguard of documents heralding a more-recent era in western thinking concerning shock events in general is, if for that reason alone, highly recommended.

As for Atzmon and Walberg, the duo who criticize the foregoing essays and essayists for the “implausibility” of their false-flag attribution of the attacks without engaging any of the evidence set forth, their shortcoming in misreading (or reading through antiquated lenses) the character of the attacks can best be attributed to their (evidently willful) lack of familiarity with the new landscape of causation common to the various linked manifestations, albeit of necessity sketchily described.

This same sort of off-throwing “lack of familiarity” with background conditions was responsible for our “primitive” ancestors’ attribution of violent storms to giants battling, or of the pronounced vertical crenellations on the gigantic volcanic plug rising from the northern Great Plains now known as Devil’s Tower to a hypothesized outraged giant bear. In both cases – if they had but known and recognized the true background elements…

Kevin Barrett, in his essay, takes this, perhaps the single, defining argument of the chaotic era we are now entering one truly Herculean step further. He suggests that what is being birthed in this book is, in fact, a vital new paradigm of western understanding, vying to displace the old. In other words, he contends that the evidence-based arguments of those we can perhaps celebrate as “The First Twenty-Three”, which comprise the bulk of this landmark book, in concert proclaiming, rather uniquely in print, that the blanket causation of the sort of events described was what we have called for a while now MIHOP – that the states deliberately and visibly claiming shared victimhood have themselves, true to their evolved, demonstrably amoral, partly-hidden nature, MADE IT HAPPEN ON PURPOSE.

I more than think he’s onto something, especially prospectively. Indeed, it would be hard to even imagine a current non-fiction book more worthy of everyone’s serious attention than this one. Happy Reading (and sharing) to all!

5 people found this helpful

Helpful

K. Brothers

Another French "false flag" reality check documented

Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2016

Verified Purchase

Kevin Barrett scores again with another excellent compendium of articles documenting the reality behind the so-called "war on terror". A must read.

One person found this helpful

Helpful

Muhammad Khan

This book is truth and nothing but truth.

Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2016

Verified Purchase

Book exposes the present day crusade on Muslims,the spread of Christianity through deceit and violene.Create refugees ND sell them christianity with a bread and blanket.Moral?No but is happening.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Tom

Book Sheds Light on Brussels Attacks as well as Paris

Reviewed in the United States on March 23, 2016

A while back, Kevin Barrett sent me a copy of ANOTHER French False Flag? to see if I might be interested in reviewing it. I was willing to bite...I'd long suspected many—if not most—of the terrorist events from 911 on have been “false flag” events orchestrated to produce the synthetic “war on terror.” This morning I woke up to the Belgium sequel of the Paris attacks--”We Are Brussels”. And I knew it was time to start writing for cries of “Islamophobia” and calls for further abridgment of European (and even American) freedom were in the air.
For a start, Barrett and several of the authors in his compendium absolutely shredded the official story of the Paris attacks and the earlier Charlie Hebdo attack and characterized them as “false flags”: events staged to some degree for political ends. Barrett is an intellectual with at least some traction in Europe and the U.S. and is Muslim. His book was, I'm afraid, such an embarrassment that those behind ISIS (the original name of the Mossad, according to a piece in the Barrett compendium) felt a need to step up their game and have some real serious explosions and casualties.
We first have CCTV footage shown on CNN allegedly showing a bombing from Zaventem Airport in Brussels. First problem: this seems identical to 2011 footage shot of the bombing of Domodedovo Airport in Russia in 2011.
Next, there are three teams and three terrorist attacks in Brussels, just as in Paris. Then there's the link to Paris fortuitously captured just prior to the event--Abdeslam--and he's being real cooperative (after having purportedly chickened out from his suicide mission in Paris) and is saying what the authorities want to hear.
Then there's the “man in the black hat” who had apparently shed his explosive vest at the Brussels' airport—providing much-needed evidence of a “suicide bomber” (just in case the ISIS flag and explosives found at another location weren't sufficient!) Using Barrett's compendium as a guide, I imagine this amazing 24-year-old “mastermind explosion survivor”--who the police were looking for ever since he survived the Bataclan in Paris--will help keep the event in the public eye for quite a while and, when needed, tie everything neatly together.
And Turkey—the EU's new indispensable partner according to Davutoglu—has “plausible deniability” even though it was key to supporting and financing ISIS according to the Barrett book. After all, wasn't it also bombed by former-paramour ISIS just the other day? (That one had me stumped until today.) This gets Erdogan off the hook for his 18 March prediction of Brussels beng bombed: "There is no reason why the bomb that exploded in Ankara could not explode in Brussels, or in any other European city," Erdogan declared during a ceremony commemorating the 101st anniversary of the Battle of Gallipoli in the coastal town of Canakkale.
Apparently it was very easy to walk into the Brussels airport with explosives—despite Erdogan's precognition. Media reports say no heightened security was present at public airports, bus and train stations or other public venues. No need to worry about increased security or nitrate-sniffing dogs. After all, why would those be present when Belgian authorities had publicly announced the previous day that “something big was being planned”—with the arrest of Paris-attack “sometime mastermind” Abdeslam?:

The top suspect in last year's Paris attacks told investigators after he was captured that he was planning new operations from Brussels and possibly had access to several weapons, Belgium's foreign minister said Sunday.
Salah Abdeslam had claimed that "he was ready to restart something from Brussels, and it's maybe the reality," (Belgian) Foreign Minister Didier Reynders said.
Reynders gave credence to the suspect's claim because "we found a lot of weapons, heavy weapons in the first investigations, and we have seen a new network of people around him in Brussels."
An examination of Salah Abdeslam that greatly discredits this official line on Brussels and the link to the Paris attacks is contained in Barrett's book: “DECODING THE PARIS ATTACKS: ISIS BLOWBACK OR FRENCH ISRAELI FALSE FLAG?” by Brandon Martinez. Firstly, Abdeslam and his allegedly deceased brother both operated a bar serving alcohol in Molenbeek, Belgium. A third brother not involved in any of the attacks states his brothers were not radicalized.
Abdeslam, after the Paris attacks, is claimed to have shed his explosive vest in a suburban dustbin for police to find and fled by car...where he was stopped and questioned by French police. This should have ended the matter, writes Martinez (pg. 41), but…when asked why police didn’t arrest Abdeslam, who had been named as a suspect hours before he was pulled over, a French police official said: “I have no explanation.”
Martinez also quotes a Daily Mail interview with Salah's sister-in-law Namia (pg. 44) to the effect that the supposed jihadi brother, Ibrahim Abdeslam, who authorities say blew himself up outside a Paris cafe, reportedly smoked “obscene amounts” of cannabis every day while he stayed at home collecting unemployment and listening to hip hop music, never went to mosque or prayed, was not the least bit interested in politics or current affairs and did not even have a TV, and had no gripe with the West.
In fact, Martinez makes a cogent case that Salah Abdeslam is one of the following: a patsy, weak minded and subject to coaching, or a government intelligence asset. (As Abdeslam is still alive, contrary to what Martinez speculated in his essay, I would say that rules out the first prospect.) He expresses strong doubts that the brothers—who were also involved in petty crime and drug dealing (hence the closing of their bar by authorities)--would have readily become jihadis in the very short period preceding the attacks. For this reason he seriously doubts the official claims that Francoise Schepmans, the mayor of the Molenbeek district of Brussels, had a list of “radical Islamists” containing the names of the Abdeslam brothers and Abdelhamid Abaaoud (allegedly seen smoking joints and drinking beer after the Paris attacks—shades of the alleged 911 attackers) on her desk a month before these attacks.
That's an important point, I think, as many official spokespersons are calling for reduced national sovereignty and the transnational sharing of information on citizens to prevent such “failures” in the future. Poppycock. This rises to the level of G.W. Bush who said of the alleged Islamic terrorists after 911,“they hate us for our freedom.” (Observe that the U.K.'s David Cameron used almost identical verbiage to classify the Brussels' attacks as similar attacks on “freedom.”)
Logically, terrorists would not want to reduce freedom as this would hamper their ability to operate! But Neocons and Zionists would welcome such attacks as they would (1) encourage the so-called clash of cultures and “Islamophobia”—the stopislam hashtag is trending in a major way on social media after the Belgium attack; (2) lock down the Western populations to facilitate future war making (this reminiscent of the infamous Protocols of Zion dictum: “We shall take away their freedom on one pretext or another. We needn’t say how long it will be until they get it back again.”); (3) make pretexts for wars against Hamas and Hezbollah and wars in Syria, Libya, Lebanon, Iran and even Russia (just heard on 22 March the speculation that Russians might be involved in hitherto unknown terror cells--on France 24!); (4) continue to depopulate areas of the Mid East according to the Israeli Yinon Plan; and, (5) make vast war profits for military contractors and banking interests.
As a youngster I learned the three elements of a crime—motive, intent and opportunity. Mujahid Kamran in the compendium essay “Why Paris 11/13?” may shed additional light in this regard as to a possible additional motive for the Brussels attack—the recent EU moves toward Palestine and labeling of illegal goods made in the West Bank. Quoting Netanyahu and Alain Soral:

“He [Netenyahu] declared to the French people on August 7th 2014, in an interview with iTele: “This is not Israel’s battle. It is your battle. If they succeed here, if Israel is criticized instead of the terrorists, if we do not stand in solidarity, this plague of terrorism will come to your country.”

If we do not understand Netanyahu’s statement as a disguised threat, it is absurd, since there is obviously no reason why recognizing Palestine and standing is solidarity with Gaza would provoke Islamist attacks on France. Referring to the Charlie Hebdo march, Alain Soral further points out: It’s the triumvirate of the police state, media propaganda, and Zionism. With this threesome one approaches a dictatorship of great modernity and subtlety.”

A reading of the Barrett compendium (Rasheed al Hajj, p. 177) tells us one thing about so-called Muslims involved in the suicide mass killing of civilian noncombatants in Brussels, Paris and other venues—they would be violating prohibitions in the Qur'an:

“Murder of innocents, even in the context of war, is strictly forbidden in the Qur’an (5:32). This is incontrovertible. Suicide is also explicitly forbidden in the Qur’an (4:29-30). Therefore, whether the terror attack of 11.13.15—Paris part deux—proves to be a political “false flag” or not, it is unalterably a religious imposter. This is to say that, whether the atrocities were carried out by ISIS sympathizers or by Israeli Mossad and French black ops forces, to attribute these actions to Islam is to raise a false flag over acts of terror.”

If the perpetrators are not strict Muslims, it is well within the realm of possibility that they are mercenaries or operatives of national players, al Hajj seems to say about the Paris perpetrators and, I'd imagine, he'd hold the same view about Brussels.
I do have serious problems with his claims that: “...100 million indigenous Native Americans (who) were slaughtered along with tens of millions of bison, both nearly to extinction, in the genocidal settling/invasion of North America by Europeans after 1492. And that barely scratches the surface of the West’s monument of war crimes against people who never attacked them.”
This is highly biased history—and many whites were attacked and massacred by Indians up until the 1870s. There were between 2.1- and 18-million Indians in what is now the U.S. in the early 1700s—the 100-million figure is beyond the wildest possibility of the land supporting this number. Less than 80,000 Indians were killed in actual military encounters. Unlike the Palestinians, most Indians did not own land nor did they have a concept of land ownership, which many considered as strange as trying to own the sky. The majority of Indian deaths occurred due to lack of resistance to diseases whites had some resistance to. As for the killing of the buffalo, blame the wealthy financial backers of the big railroads who sponsored buffalo-killing trips. Not all of them were white Europeans.
Another element of the potential false flags discussed in Barrett's compendium is the issue of Satanic and occult footprints, numerology and the like. His interview with Ole Dammegard is reproduced in full and worth reading. Since Ole hasn't commented on Brussels yet, I'll have to start the discussion here. The occult Skull & Bones Society at Yale, of which G.W. and G.H.W. Bush and John Kerry were members, places great significance on the number 322—relating to German Illuminism-- and was founded in 1832. Some numerologists feel 322 is somehow related to the Hebrew letter representing 6–the Hebrew “vav” or “W”--666 in this case. The frequent occurrence of 13s related to false flags seems to be connected to the destruction of the Templars (forerunners of Illuminism and Freemasonry) on Friday the 13th.
Besides its many good points, ANOTHER French False Flag? contains essays like “White Lives Matter” of Ajamu Baraka that seem out of place. To any people (including Asian, black and brown people) the lives of their own kind matter most as they are most familiar. Often, the problem is with the mainstream media coverage of the Middle East rather than with “white psychopathology.” Whites have donated uncounted millions of dollars to aid in disasters in nonwhite countries and spent trillions on social services for American blacks. So they obviously do care. In the U.S., I see whites at “black lives matter” rallies but I see no blacks protesting the violent crime wave against whites.
A similar piece, U.S. IMPERIALISM AND THE WANTON DESTRUCTION OF CULTURES by Anthony James Hall, implies white imperialists are trying to colonize the Levant.
I found the view of James Petras in this compendium to be far closer to reality in this regard than Hall (pg. 136): “The American public provides the gold and blood for these misadventures and reaps nothing but domestic deterioration and greater international strife.”
It's also refreshing to see Petras' demolition of the canard that the evil “Westerners” attack the Mid East solely for the oil and gas. In the case of the destruction of Libya, Petras points out:

“The Zionist faction destroyed Gaddafi (whose capture, grotesque torture and murder was filmed and widely disseminated), eliminating another real adversary of Israel and supporter of Palestinian rights. The US militarist faction, which led the war, got nothing positive—not even a secure naval, air or training base—only a dead Ambassador, millions of desperate refugees flooding Europe and thousands of trained and armed jihadists for the next target: Syria...

Once again the least influential faction in Washington turned out to be the oil and gas industry [Emphasis mine] which lost lucrative contracts it had already signed with the Gaddafi regime. Thousands of highly trained foreign oil workers were withdrawn. After Iraq, it should have been obvious that these wars were not “for oil”!

Those who share such views as Baraka and Hall should consider that in so-called “white” countries with large immigrant populations, the resident white populations were seldom if ever consulted about this immigration and it was imposed on them by edict and “lawfare”. Forcing so-called “diversity” in this way is a form of asymmetric warfare—if done to nonwhites it would be called biological and cultural genocide. (I personally think collapsing of the social-safety net is also a major neoliberal goal with this effort.)
Gearoid O Colmain makes a good case against the knee-jerk support of this type of “immigration” by misguided liberals and “third world” peoples. I finish this review with one of the most profound observations in Barrett's compendium—about what O Colmain calls “Coercive Engineered Migration” (pg. 115 ff.):

“Immigrants are used as weapons by one state to destabilize another...being carried out with ruthless efficiency by US funded NGOs which are also linked to oligarchs such as George Soros and Carlos Slim...(and) to powerful US and Israeli financial institutions, while ORS systems, one of the main project management companies dealing with refugees in Europe, is managed by a company affiliated to Barclays bank. The “refugee crisis” is big business and is part of a global class war which seeks to uproot humans from localities, languages, cultures and traditions, transforming man into an economic nomad eternally worshiping at the altar of commodity fetishism…The Project for a New American Century (PNAC), the brainchild of Zionists and neo-conservatives, threatens to enslave humanity...The war on terror is a creation of Zionism which... seeks to divide and conquer “the nations” (goyim) through takfiri proxy armies who mimic the Assassins of the Middle Ages, clearing the ground for the expansion of Zionist hegemony in the Middle East...

The Gaza concentration camp is a microcosm of the world to come, for the entire global policy of Zionism is attempting to reduce man to the status of a refugee, an outlaw, a terrorist. The troops on our streets and surveillance in our skies, far from temporary measures designed to protect civilians from terrorism, represent the encroaching Gaza-fication of the world.”

11 people found this helpful

Helpful

seekerotruth

An Outstanding Collection About the Secret, But Not So Secret, Plague of Our Times

Reviewed in the United States on May 3, 2016

Yes, do buy this book while you still can. I must confess to having read only part of it, but what I have read is outstanding. Kevin Barrett gives a thoughtful and powerful introduction which includes material he wrote right after the second Paris and San Bernardino attacks. They both are extremely suspicious. Paul Craig Roberts had piece upon piece after Paris II that point to many strange anomalies. So many great researchers like Brandon Martinez, Nick Kollerstrom, Patrick Henningsen, James H. Fetzer, Ole Dammegard, and James Tracy are represented here. There also pieces by excellent analysts such as James Petras, Ken O'Keefe, Alain Soral, and Gilad Atzmon. These are all substantial pieces. For me, the presumption is that any major attack is probably a false flag. In fact, it's hard for me to think of ones that aren't false flags. People need to stop falling for these things, and I must stress most pointedly that otherwise generally helpful commentators in the alternative media are doing quite a disservice when they go along with the official versions of these events without honestly investigating them. I won't mention names, but anyone who follows the alternative media knows who they are.

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English

Ben

False flags, but this book's real

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on July 18, 2020

Verified Purchase

Made me think about what really might be going on, I look forward to reading more by Kevin Barrett and on the subject of false flags. lots of good authors included in this book, I look forward to reading their other works as well

One person found this helpful

Robert

Takes Moral Courage to absorb the implications.

Reviewed in Canada on October 1, 2016

Verified Purchase

A very important book! Provides brilliant insight into the workings of the 'rogue' elements within law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
Many different perspectives are provided from across the political and religious spectrum. It puts the terrible, sickening events into a very plausible scenario that takes a lot of courage and mental muscle to process and assimilate because you come to see these repeated viscous assaults around the world as being scripted and assisted by covert, unaccountable elements within the governments' security apparatus.

One person found this helpful

John Duddy

An Historic Document.

Reviewed in Canada on January 8, 2016

Verified Purchase

This is a monumental work assembled by Dr. Barrett. It contains research by a top notch list of scholars who are not buying official reports of recent events in France and USA. Every Canadian member of parliament, every senator and the Prime Minister of Canada must address these findings and stop the madness now gripping our planet.
Highest praise to Dr. Kevin Barrett for bringing out this timely book.

One person found this helpful

spiritus

Indispensable analysis.

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on August 24, 2016

Verified Purchase

This book is concerned with the events of the 13th November 2015 in Paris, France. As well as analysing the minutiae of the affair it seeks to place the event within the overall context of other mass shootings that appear to be taking place in Europe and the United States in recent and current times. It is valid to say 'appear' to be taking place because outside of the mainstream media (in particular among the citizen journalism of the internet) a great deal of independent analysis is taking place that thoroughly undermines the official accounts of these events promoted by the privately owned media conglomerates as well as state media such as the British Broadcasting Corporation.

Of the twenty-six distinguished contributors to this book twelve possess Ph.Ds (seven of whom are current or former tenured university professors) which results in the bar being set at a high level regarding the quality and thoroughness of analysis. The majority of these contributors have concluded that the general public throughout the western world are being deceived into a false belief that there is such a thing as Islamic terrorism in order to galvanize western public opinion into supporting The War On Terror which in reality is a neo-colonial war of conquest to destroy the last remaining Arab secular states and enable and justify Israeli expansionism not only its ongoing absorption of what remains of Arab Palestine but its long-term goal of subsuming the adjacent Arab polities in accordance with the original vision of Theodor Herzl as enunciated in his 1896 book 'The Jewish State'. Herzl there asserted: “the area of the Jewish State stretches: “From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” This opinion was reiterated by Rabbi Fischmann of the Jewish Agency for Palestine in his testimony to the U.N. Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: “The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt [ie the Nile] up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.” It is worth adding here (to those who may be unaware or sceptical of the reality of this long-term goal of the Zionist movement) that the two blue lines on the national flag of the State of Israel represent the Nile and Euphrates rivers.

One of the themes that is explored in this book is “To what extent is 'Islamic terrorism' a creation of the Zionist movement?” To anyone who is aware that 9/11 was an 'inside job' intended to be the inciting incident that sparked 'The War On Terror' such a possibility is well within the scope of reason. Why, for example, has ISIS (the so-called Islamic State) never attacked the principal spanner-in-the-works of any potential federated united states of Arab-Islamic peoples - The State of Israel itself ? Wouldn't Israel be the first port of call for any paramilitary political movement seeking a unified Islamic caliphate in the Middle-East? Why are the atrocities they commit focused on citizens of states with a strong track record of proud Arab self-determination such as Syria and Iraq?

Seen within the context of the long term goal of 'Greater Israel' the notion that the 'Clash of Civilizations' narrative (which posits a fundamental and deadly antagonism between the West and Islam) is an enthusiastically propagated (though ultimately contrived) fiction of the Zionist movement made real in the eyes of the public thanks to the pro-active collusion of the mainstream media appears somewhat less far-fetched. Under what other circumstances could the State of Israel expand its borders except within the context of a perceived Great Threat to her existence? And under what other circumstances would United States forces be justified in invading sovereign states except within the context of a perceived deadly threat to her national security?

One comes away from this book with a very clear sense that Islamic terrorism rather than being a form of blowback for western interference in the middle east (or a reaction to western moral decadence) is an exclusive creation of the current world hegemons (namely the United States, the British Commonwealth and their Middle Eastern allies Israel and Saudi Arabia) to justify an otherwise illegal programme of military intervention. Thus the great threat to peace and stability in both the middle east and the west turns out not to be Islamic fundamentalism but rather the machinations of the Anglo-American Zionist ruling elites who have created this state of affairs.

Given the ubiquitous collusion of the mainstream media with the the Zionist project in the west books like these are essential to getting a clearer picture of what is really going on. We are grateful to the authors for their efforts in disabusing us of the false beliefs and illusions that the mass media are working so very hard to imprint on our hearts and minds.

9 people found this helpful

Kindle Customer: A.C. Guex, Basel

Nur 3 Seiten des Textes erhalten!

Reviewed in Germany on January 9, 2016

Verified Purchase

Leider erhielt der Download des Buches lediglich die Titelseite und zwei Abbildungen. Vom Text fehlt jede Spur. Hier muss ein Fehler passiert sein.

Translate review to English

See all reviews