
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-20% $20.70$20.70
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Very Good
$6.41$6.41
FREE delivery January 31 - February 5
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Phoenix Sold by: ThriftBooks-Phoenix
Learn more
0.27 mi | MANASSAS 20110
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Secrets and Lies: Operation Iraqi Freedom and After: A Prelude to the Fall of U.S. Power in the Middle East? Paperback – December 25, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length496 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateDecember 25, 2003
- Dimensions5 x 1.13 x 7.6 inches
- ISBN-101560255560
- ISBN-13978-1560255567
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of U.S. PowerHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 30
The Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack ObamaPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 30Only 7 left in stock (more on the way).
The Iraq War: The Military Offensive, from Victory in 21 Days to the Insurgent AftermathPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 30
The Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack ObamaHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 30Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Frustrated Empire: US Foreign Policy, 9/11 to IraqPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 30
The Longest War: The Enduring Conflict between America and Al-QaedaPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 30
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2005Middle East expert Dilip Hiro chronicles the runup and impact of the Bush crusade to "liberate" Iraq. He typifies the link the Bush adminstration made between the events of 2001-09-11 as a "phantom". There was no association between the Saddam Hussein government and the lawless attackers known as Al Qaida. Nor were there indications that Iraq clandestinely developed nuclear or chemical weapons that could be brought to bear on neighbouring countries, let alone Britain or the US. In sum, Hiro's depiction of the formation of the "coalition of the willing" is shown as a tissue of misleading information based on a strategy of fear - a "monumental confidence trick" with endless ramifications.
Hiro assembles a cast of flawed characters, giving a biographical sketch of such people as George Walker Bush, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Anthony Blair. From this background, he then describes the various utterances each has produced to justify the crusade. From the beginning, he makes clear that the Iraq invasion would take place. All that was needed was justification. This was provided by various forms of "evidence", all of which was either false or flawed. Tubing for "nuclear centrifuges" turned out to be engine cases. A quest for uranium proved false. And nuclear and chemical weapons claimed by the Bush administration proved elusive - they have yet to be found. With such faulty information at his disposal, even after some of the lies were exposed, Bush gained authority to launch the crusade from a supine US Congress. The US media, once considered a bastion of investigative journalism, remained silent or compliant as the fallacies were revealed.
From the preparations for invasion, which included a eight-month illegal air assault on a sovereign nation, code-named "Southern Focus", Hiro moves on to the actual conflict. The lies and deceptions didn't end with the launching of Tomahawk missiles. In battles where the invaders were to have destroyed only military resistance, the "coalition" dropped updated napalm and used "cluster" weapons. The impact of these devices on the civilian population remains to be assessed, but by the fall of the Hussein government, more than three times the number of civilians killed by the attack on the World Trade Centre had been inflicted. And that's the conservative estimate. Hiro tracks the journal of one young Baghdad woman as the barrage of bombs and missiles rains down on the city. The Bush administration's contention that the Iraqi population would welcome the Yanks with "flowers and cheers" proved as flawed as his reasons for the invasion.
Bush didn't launch a pre-emptive war, but a preventive one. A pre-emptive war is an action to curtail a visible threat. No such threat, especially against the US, existed in Iraq. Bush's imperialist declaration of 2002, which stipulated the US had abrogated unto itself the sole privilege of determining what threatened that nation, obliterated the distinction between pre-emptive and preventive, writes Hiro. This action overturned a precedent set in 1648 in the Treaty of Westphalia, a model for all international relations ever since. Bush also sought to overturn any cooperative mechanisms in his unilateral actions. His method to garner small nations into joining the "coalition of the willing" was by browbeating them with threats of withholding future aid. The populations of even those nations joining the crusade were overwhelmingly opposed to involvement and said so in massive demonstrations, Hiro notes.
In his Summary and Conclusion, Hiro notes the resentment evidenced by Iraqis to the invasion. Even those gleeful at the toppling of Saddam Hussein have no desire for retention of foreign occupiers. The vaunted technology that guided missiles to government facilities has yet to ensure water or electrical supplies to the population of Baghdad and other cities. The mantra of "remnants of the old regime" leading the resistance to the invaders has been repeatedly refuted, Hiro demonstrates. Bremer's "Interim Governing Council" even lacked a ministry for religious affairs - in a nation rent by sectarian differences. The occupying forces, especially those of the US, lacked fundamental understanding of the Arab culture present in Iraq. With much of that culture evident in the Middle East and transported to other Muslim nations, is there any mystery in why resentment against Bush's unilateral adventurism remains in force?
The core of Bush's policies toward Iraq were false and/or misleading, according to Hiro. After reading his summation of declarations and events, it's impossible to refute his thesis. His deceptive administration has demonstrated a mastery of "spin", perhaps only exceeded by that of his flunky, Tony Blair. Rumsfeld's "Office of Special Projects", set well apart from the established departments for intelligence, provided the grounds for invasion. Their information is shown to be either unreliable or long outdated. Yet this was the basis for conning the US Congress into accepting Bush's request for war. Hiro goes on to note how the Bush government edited reports on environmental and health questions in order to sustain his policies. Real information has been shelved, ignored or rebutted to quell dissenters. In sum, it's clear that this book is a mandatory read for all in the USA. Read it for its wealth of information and clarity of presentation. It's a rewarding and insightful summary of adminstration with a tenuous hold on truth. [stephen a. haines - Ottawa, Canada]
- Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2006Dilip Hiro has revealed a set of commandments for common man, pitted against those of God's gift to Bush.Those few of of us, who advised all of us on why we should side with the Superpower and join the coalition militarily must be eating their words, with their so called shallow pride too. An unjust war by Iraq on Kuwait was as unjustified as this Anglo-American invasion on Iraq. The poster boy of the coalition war, Gen Tommy Franks, CENTCOM has labored enough on Iraq operation in his memoirs (American Soldier) and has lauded his President and the triumvirate of Cheney, Rumsfeld and Powell against uncooperative Pentagon and CIA with its hard nosed chief, George Tenet. However the background to decision on Iraq war eluded him too as he was already outstretched in Afghan war and wanted a desperate time period for build up to take on Iraq as well. That he carried out the conventional operation splendidly goes to his credit but the failure to hold on to early gains in a long drawn out war of terror by Iraqi resistance, buttresses the thesis of Dilip Hiro as he quotes Bush in his dyslexic stupor, "God told me to strike at Al Qaeda and I struck them, and then He instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did". God beware lest he tells Bush to look ominously at Iran (as he already is staring!). Who's next?? Ask God or wait for Bush to reveal new Commandments. So much, for World peace, by an "Inspired Leader". Thank you Hiro for enlightening us, you are the Hero of common man. And your book is our Commandment.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2004Events of course can be observed and documented, but the inner moods and intentions of humans cannot. This fact is forgotten by historians, political commentators, journalists, pundits, writers, and government officials unfortunately. Instead of documenting the events as they occur, and as can be perceived by everyone, the main goal instead is to impute certain frames of mind in the individuals who are involved in these events. The author of this book is no exception to this trend, and the title of the book is a dead giveaway to this fact. It may be true that George Bush knew that the reasons he spoke of for invading Iraq were false; it is just as plausible to believe that he really believed in the reasons he gave. No matter how "reasonable" it seems to believe that Bush was lying, the fact remains that one cannot look inside his mind to determine if he really was. There is a large uncertainty involved in any conclusion reached regarding the intents and motivations of human beings. Science is just not sophisticated enough to judge by external behavior whether a person is lying, and until it is it must remain an open question as to whether that person is or not.
The author does document the pain and horror felt by the citizens of Iraq when exposed to the horrific act of terror brought onto them by U.S. and coalition forces. He does this by interjecting certain journal entries kept by a few Iraqis during the illegal and immoral invasion of their country. One can only hope in their authenticity, and such skepticism or doubt regarding their authenticity raises other issues involving the claims of certain individuals to have access to information that others do not. In this regard, is the author of this book privy to information that the rest of us do not have? And if the president can engage in such blatant twisting of the facts, why should the reader not believe that the author has also done the same?
A closely related issue is one that also plagues modern journalism and political commentary, namely that the intent of a writer or government official often gets confused with the truth of their claims. It does not matter if the author of this book wrote the book with the intent of financial gain. All that matters is whether the content of the book is true. Many commentators constantly commit this error: the intent of the person for producing a given work is thought to negate the conclusions of the work. The author may have an axe to grind against the current administration, or he may be trying to propagate certain political beliefs or doctrines, or he may be interested in filling his bank account. None of this is relevant regarding the truth of what appears in his book.
But then, how would one verify that what the author is claiming as historical fact is really the way it happened? Should we trust him in this regard? No, we shouldn't. What we should do is engage in the research ourselves in an attempt to verify his assertions. This will be difficult and time-consuming, but such is the nature of seeking the truth. It is easy to form opinions. It is quite another matter to find and verify genuine knowledge.
The book opens with a statement by Bush that he supposedly spoke to (the now former) Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas: "God told me to strike at Al Qaida and I struck them, and then He instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did." I did not hear this statement directly from Bush on television or radio. Did Bush say it? Maybe. Does he believe it? If he does, then Bush is a very disturbed individual. Is it relevant to the author's case in the book, to the historical facts which he takes aim to delineate? No, it is not. It could be omitted without affecting the author's case. It serves no scholarly purpose at all.
Top reviews from other countries
Kazim TajriReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 28, 20205.0 out of 5 stars Good.
Good read.

