
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-24% $20.89$20.89
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$15.45$15.45
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: GreatBookDealz
Learn more
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
None So Blind: A Personal Account of the Intelligence Failure in Vietnam Hardcover – August 28, 2001
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIvan R. Dee
- Publication dateAugust 28, 2001
- Dimensions6.2 x 1.16 x 9.4 inches
- ISBN-101566633877
- ISBN-13978-1566633871
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Customers who bought this item also bought
Putin's Wars: From Chechnya to UkraineHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Jan 6Only 17 left in stock (more on the way).
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star70%30%0%0%0%70%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star70%30%0%0%0%30%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star70%30%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star70%30%0%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star70%30%0%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Actually, it was the best we could do.
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2006This is altogether an extraordinary book by an extraordinary author. It is nothing less than the history of the evolution of U.S. policy towards Vietnam from the end of WWII to the conquest of South Vietnam by the Vietnamese Communists as observed by a professional intelligence analyst. The insights this book provides are not just on U.S. involvement in Vietnam (and by extension Laos and Cambodia), but on how U.S. National Security Policy toward South East Asia was formulated over a twenty year period. The comments about the value of a systematic process of formulating national security policy by integrating military, intelligence, and policy considerations are alone worth the price of the book.
If this were all the book did it would be a remarkable achievement. But George W. Allen does considerably more than this. Allen was from the beginning of his long career (some fifty years total) first and foremost a working intelligence analyst. As such he focused on Vietnam for some 18 years and developed in that time the increasingly rare quality of detailed knowledge of his target. Reading this book should provide any attentive reader with an excellent understanding of how the process of intelligence analysis actually works when executed by a real professional.
Although a personal account, Allen's book has an authentic feel to it. This reviewer found much of his account hauntingly familiar although we never met or worked together. Certainly his inability on several occasions to perform truly all source analysis due to ill-conceived compartmentalization is quite familiar. The same is true for his encounters with senior military leaders and civilian policy makers who considered any intelligence that did support their views almost a personal affront.
The Washington D.C. area is fairly awash with former `intelligence officers' claiming to be intelligence or counter-terrorism `experts' based on often rather dubious experiences in the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC). It is refreshing then when a real intelligence professional is actually willing to share his thoughts with general public. Towards the end of this book, Allen, identifies himself as a "professional intelligence analyst" which he truly was. The U.S. could use a lot more like him.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 8, 2015An interesting book for anyone who has had direct experience with both the Vietnam war and the intelligence process.
It reinforces the point that,if you are not in a uniform, that your information and analysis is less valuable and often discounted. The author offers concrete examples that amplify his case.
Mr. Allen is eminently qualified, based on his breadth of experience and long service.
There is somewhat of whining tone to the book. Nevertheless, that should not distract from this extensive analysis of the conflicts in SE Asia.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 28, 2016I served as an infantry platoon sergeant in Vietnam in 1969. This is without a doubt one of the best books that I have read concerning Vietnam. I especially liked the following comment from page 25: "Few of us, however, would have gone so far in the 1950's as to argue that the Vietnamese Communists would some day prove to be a more effective barrier to Chinese hegemony in Southeast Asia than American military power". This proved to be the case when in the 1970's Vietnam invaded Cambodia, when the rest of the world simply sat by and watched the massacre, to defeat the Khmer Rouge. This upset the Chinese government that was in support of the Khmer Rouge. In response, China invaded Vietnam in 1979, only to be repulsed by the Vietnamese. Today the Vietnamese hate the Chinese, and consider America to be their friend. What a difference 40+ years makes. I personally believe that if FDR had lived, he would have continued to argue against the French returning to Vietnam after the end of WWII, and he would have supported an independent Vietnam......thus there would have been no Vietnam War, and the deaths of 59,000 Americans and several million Vietnamese would never had occurred.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2016I had a passing interest in Vietnam, but was always far from the Saigon scene and missed what they were up to. This book gave me some views that I missed. Perhaps my difference with the author is that he expected the USA to react faster to information. Nations are slow to change and it took a while to learn that Hanoi was willing to spend more than we were for a "victory." Really Hanoi could have gained more by surrendering and letting us leave. The critics of the war have to remember that in a muddled effort it is always more important to work toward a solution than to give up to a disaster. But we did persevere and when it was clear there was nothing to gain we left. Slow, to be sure. But the right decision. I have only one question for all the Vietnam experts. How many Vietnamese do you still know and talk to?
I suggest the Deforest book, since I worked for him from 72 to 75 in Bien Hoa.
5.0 out of 5 stars Actually, it was the best we could do.I had a passing interest in Vietnam, but was always far from the Saigon scene and missed what they were up to. This book gave me some views that I missed. Perhaps my difference with the author is that he expected the USA to react faster to information. Nations are slow to change and it took a while to learn that Hanoi was willing to spend more than we were for a "victory." Really Hanoi could have gained more by surrendering and letting us leave. The critics of the war have to remember that in a muddled effort it is always more important to work toward a solution than to give up to a disaster. But we did persevere and when it was clear there was nothing to gain we left. Slow, to be sure. But the right decision. I have only one question for all the Vietnam experts. How many Vietnamese do you still know and talk to?
Reviewed in the United States on December 10, 2016
I suggest the Deforest book, since I worked for him from 72 to 75 in Bien Hoa.
Images in this review
- Reviewed in the United States on November 8, 2001The author enlisted in the U.S. Navy in the Second World War and then transferred to military intelligence before ultimately ending up in the CIA. Thsi book is the story of his life in the intelligence community and his opposition to the methods used by the United States to fight the war in Vietnam.
The book is a very useful primer to those who are interested in the actual practice of military intelligence in the field, explaining exactly how armies compile intelligence on their enemies, and how that intelligence is collected into reports which are of use to those higher up the chain of command. The author shares his frustrations with the intelligence war in Vietnam, and makes useful observations of the efforts by the French in Vietnam, prior to the Americans, and also the British in Malaya.
I recommend this book as a good insight to what field intelligence is really about, and also for its breezy style.

