Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
What's the Matter with Kansas? : How Conservatives Won the Heart of America Paperback – Bargain Price, May 1, 2005
- Print length336 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHolt McDougal
- Publication dateMay 1, 2005
- Dimensions5.43 x 0.93 x 8.31 inches
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?PaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
The People, No: A Brief History of Anti-PopulismPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
Rendezvous with Oblivion: Reports from a Sinking SocietyHardcoverFREE ShippingGet it Jan 6 - 9Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives RuleHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Tuesday, Jan 7Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American RightPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
How Democracies DiePaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book entertaining and informative. They praise the writing style as well-written, concise, and easy to read. Readers appreciate the humor and find the author humorous. However, some feel the book is biased and filled with personal opinions disguised as facts.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book engaging and entertaining, though some readers mention it gets repetitive at times. They consider it an important read that provides an excellent review of how the right gained political power. It's a quick read that anyone interested in politics would recommend.
"...This is an important book that deserves consideration...." Read more
"...vs. cultural mechanism of so-called conservatism, and his book has been a great success. He has nothing to complain of...." Read more
"...The book is a provocative and interesting excellent read." Read more
"...I believe this book is the one for them. Overall, a great read; it does for the late 20th/early 21st centuries what Tocqueville's "Democracy in..." Read more
Customers find the book insightful and informative about American politics. They appreciate its well-written style and illustrative stories that help explain how values voters are misled. The book provides useful context for those interested in conservatism and puts the party in an accurate context.
"...Frank appears to the reader as a self-identified Liberal, and a man of sincere, balanced conviction...." Read more
"...This book really answers those questions well. Furthermore, the writing style is fantastic...." Read more
"...Everything from class views, to views on taxes and government spending, to ideas about right and wrong; this author has put his finger onto the..." Read more
"...But it is, for all its flaws, revelatory, and a book I wish I and many others would have read a decade ago." Read more
Customers find the writing style engaging and easy to read. They describe it as well-written, concise, and informative. The book is written for a college educated audience and is a must-read for anyone trying to form strategies. Readers praise the author as a gifted writer who entertains while providing useful information without condescension.
"...It was a good reading experience. This is a writer who entertains as he informs, but doesn't condescend...." Read more
"...Furthermore, the writing style is fantastic. Every time one picks it up, it's nearly impossible to put down...." Read more
"This is a largely entertaining read, although Frank gets a bit repetitious at times...." Read more
"...of this book dissects and analyzes this stupidity wonderfully and concisely...." Read more
Customers find the writing quality good. They describe it as well-written, brilliant, and solid. The print quality is also appreciated.
"...The book is proof positive that 'the truth will out' and do so in noteworthy style." Read more
"Very well written; sprightly even...." Read more
"Solid writing" Read more
"Brilliant!..." Read more
Customers find the humor amusing and insightful. They also say the author is funny.
"The author is funny. But humor almost always has a victim, and the victim is his neighbor state (Frank was born in Kansas City, MO, apparently)...." Read more
"...resident of the midwest (although not a native) I found it especially amusing and insightful...." Read more
"...It's interesting, entertaining, informative, and easy to read." Read more
"Entertaining and offers a different view of Sam Brownback and the people who put him into office." Read more
Customers find the book biased and filled with errors. They mention the author's egotism, personal opinions disguised as facts, and judgmental tone. The book is described as partisan and narrowly partisan, casting conservatives in a dim light.
"...It is overwhelmingly anecdotal, and far from a systematic analytical work, but it is also suggestive and provocative...." Read more
"...It's an undeniably partisan book that casts conservatives in a dim, dim light..." Read more
"...But his book was so filled with errors, personal opinions disguised as facts and mislabeling of events, people and general culture, as to make it a..." Read more
"This book is based on a terrible error. It is an error in logic with a related failure to provide empirical evidence...." Read more
Reviews with images
The answer is biological
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 26, 2006When this book first appeared in 2004, "What's the Matter with Kansas?" was hailed as a powerful explanation of the political divide present in the early twenty-first century United States. Journalist Thomas Frank, who grew up in the upper-middle class suburbs of Kansas City, explores how a state renowned for agrarian radicalism in the latter nineteenth century, to say nothing of socialist ideals in the early twentieth, became a bastion of conservatism by the turn of the twenty-first. His answer, cultural and values politics rather than economic politics have dominated the current political scene. Written in a breezy style, it will not satisfy scholars but it nonetheless presents a compelling introduction to the current political divisions of the United States.
Frank begins by asking a simple question, why do people vote against their economic interests? The Republican Party, he notes, has a penchant for big business, lessening regulations, and a diminution of the social programs that defined politics from the New Deal to the Great Society. The genius of the conservative movement, and the reason for its success, required a draining of the quest for economic justice that had dominated that earlier effort from the political agenda. Conservatives replaced it with values and cultural issues that attracted working class voters. The centerpiece of this was the anti-abortion issue, but it also included symbols of patriotism such as flag burning and the Pledge of Allegiance, the sanctity of marriage and whether it should be extended to gays, the stories told of American history, religious conceptions and their legitimacy in the public sphere, and the science behind evolution and other issues that some find uncomfortable.
At its core, the values agenda advanced by the Republicans allowed the party to capture beginning in the 1980s all three branches of U.S. government and to rule with virtually no coordinated and effective opposition as the twenty-first century began. To be successful, they had to divorce all of these issues from the economic ones with which Republicans are so often identified and to motivate voters to support their values agenda despite the economic measures also a part of the Republican political effort.
Ironically, while making considerable noise about cultural values and hot-button issues, the Republican majorities have done almost nothing to reverse the policies that motivated voters to send majorities of Republicans to Washington in the first place. This may well be, one of the great mysteries of current American politics. At the time this book was published, the Republicans had controlled the House of Representatives for ten years, and all three branches of government since January 2003. Even so, no major legislation had been passed to reverse the situation that values voters abhorred. Most importantly, nothing had been done to reverse a woman's right to chose whether or not to have a baby. This was the most volatile social issue and the one which Thomas Frank and others believe should have been on the top of the Republican agenda. The fact nothing substantive has changed is because of a series of rifts within the Republican Party as it fights internally over agenda-setting. At some level, co-opting the values voters, according to Frank, was a Machiavellian ploy to gain the votes necessary to take control of the U.S. government. Thereafter, the party ruled in the interest of its big business constituency, and in the process stabbed at least twice the constituency of values voters by not enacting the measures they advocated even as they harmed them with their economic policies.
This is an important book that deserves consideration. It is, of course, a journalistic account of the current political divisions of the United States. It is overwhelmingly anecdotal, and far from a systematic analytical work, but it is also suggestive and provocative. There is every reason to believe it will be referenced in the on-going political analyses of the twenty-first century.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2009Odd: I finished the book less than 15 minutes ago, and found when I booted up the Amazon site, that I'd bought a hard-cover book. I hadn't noticed at all. But while reading KANSAS I didn't notice much of anything else outside the experience. It was a good reading experience. This is a writer who entertains as he informs, but doesn't condescend. His descriptions of his home city and his memories of it from childhood to the present, are colorful and fairly easy. Not a happy group of pictures mostly; the area has suffered, shriveled. If he has ferocious angers, acid envies and hatreds within him, we don't really see or hear them. His coming of age was deftly told; that is, when he first understood that he would never be one of the elite, and accepted it.
Lingering, the realization that this book was published five years ago, and now its as though I'm looking at its conclusions through the near-derelect strip-mall spaces of one of the suburbs and small towns he shows us. And Frank shows us with clarity the effects that the business failures of big corporations have had, through the people he describes and interviews; the Backlash Republican Radicals. Their willful disregard of the effects of the forces that move them is tragic. It is as though they, the underclass, know they will always be scorned by those of the upper class, the Limousine Republicans, and so they firmly grasp that contempt and turn it inward in an act of Sepuku as if to say, Your contempt for us is our self-destruction, but our glory as well! And, Frank describes it all without sentiment, so that even in their folly, their hippocracy or their delusion, they have dignity.
Still, I'm haunted by the final chapter of the book in which he appears to propose that perhaps a preponderant share of the destructive collapse of Kansas' civic pride is due to the fatal neglect by the Democratic Party, of its principal support and client, Organized Labor. Isn't it obvious? Completely nuts. Here, they're designated Liberals. It is true that for a time the cocuntry got sucked into the Thatcher-Reagan vortex of Liberal vs. Conservative spin, forgetting that all we ever were was Republican and Democrat, caught up in one national economy, and that toxic foreign conceit led to a growing self-delusion that blinded us to our self-interest, as we deafened ourselves with rancor that grew in foolishness as it grew in volume. Worse we allowed our civic dialogue to be poisoned by the Occult; that is, the propaganda of those who have faith without knowledge.
Yes, we are in a time of rabid Anti-intelectualism. But then what? Greed, no matter how you rationalize it is not an ideology, and morbid selfishness is no way to run a participatory democracy. Or, maybe that's the point. Democracy = the tyrany of the masses. Plutocracy = the tyrany of the rich. Slavery is easiest; you have your mind made up for you and you eat scraps.
Frank appears to the reader as a self-identified Liberal, and a man of sincere, balanced conviction. My feeling is that he resisted the temptation to speak out with strength. His temperament, probably. I don't feel his hot breath on my cheek, and in a way that's a pity. Certainly propagandists and pamphleteers can be and often are boring. People who cannot empathize with others are. Probably he chose wisely to self-censor in order that many, or at least more, might read and think where others would curse and turn away. I don't know. He's revealed a lot of the economic vs. cultural mechanism of so-called conservatism, and his book has been a great success. He has nothing to complain of.
MORAL: The USA is a commercial (bait-and-switch) enterprise and strip-mall faith is a bi-product. Get used to it because its going to get worse.
Top reviews from other countries
-
CastaingReviewed in France on November 17, 20234.0 out of 5 stars ? quel titre?
conforme à la demande
-
Santiago VélezReviewed in Spain on January 20, 20175.0 out of 5 stars Muy interesante explicación de la reacción (backlash ) de los EEUU
Muy interesante para entender 2016. Describe la reacción (backlash) contra el progresismo y la corrección política que desde los 70 ha ido creciendo en EEUU. Y la traición de los políticos supuestamente conservadores a sus votantes de clase media, con una política económica que favorece a los muy ricos y asumiendo en lo social el ideario de la izquierda. Lo mismo que en España. Y entonces llega Trump y recoge todo ese descontento y gana contra todo pronóstico. Para leer otra vez dentro de 4 años, a ver si también Trump ha traicionado a los 'backlashers' como el resto de políticos republicanos.
-
SR GorReviewed in Germany on May 2, 20165.0 out of 5 stars Spannend
...nicht nur für den an amerikanischer Politik interessierten.
Ist das Buch zwangsläufig auch an speziellen amerikanischen Gegebenheiten orientiert, dem lahmarschigen Zwei-Parteien-System, so ist es doch interessant, die Parallelen zu der bei uns gerade entstehenden Tea-Party und ihrer vermuteten Wählerschaft
herauszusuchen.
Drüben die Koch Brüder, hier "elitäre" vom Steuerzahler durchgefütterte Professoren und Industrielle.
Hüben wie drüben entfesselte Wutbürger, vom Leben betrogen und stets auf Konfrontation bedacht gegen alles was anders ist - in den Staaten
die Feindbilder "Progressives", "Liberals", hierzulande die "68er" und "Gutmenschen".
Hoffentlich gibt es baldigst ein deutsches Pendant, welches mit vergleichbarer Tiefe auslotet, was die Deutschen verleitet konstant gegen ihre Interessen zu wählen (falls es das schon geben sollte, wäre ich dankbar für einen Link per Kommentar).
MijmoReviewed in the United Kingdom on February 28, 20155.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
brilliant classic which is also instructive to how Cameron's Tories try to manipulate the public in the uk.
BtotheSReviewed in Italy on November 25, 20144.0 out of 5 stars Good book
Good book about politics, interesting reading about how kansas evolved through the year as far as politics. Quite interteining book.

