Tory Burch on Shopbop
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy Hardcover – Bargain Price, February 27, 2007

3.9 3.9 out of 5 stars 36 ratings

Book by Cockburn, Andrew
The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Customer reviews

3.9 out of 5 stars
36 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book well-researched and engaging. They describe it as an entertaining read with cogent arguments about a fascinating topic.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

Select to learn more
6 customers mention "Enlightened content"6 positive0 negative

Customers find the book's content enlightening and well-researched. They appreciate the cogent arguments and interesting topic. While some readers found the facts correct, others felt the interpretation was flawed.

"This entertaining and enlightening book by veteran journalist Andrew Cockburn goes a long way to explaining many of the most puzzling errors and..." Read more

"...What a disappointment!!- Yes, the facts are mostly correct but, the interpretation is so one sided that the whole book is received as non-true...." Read more

"This is definately an interesting topic, and the book raises cogent arguments...." Read more

"...disdain, along w/neocons, I found Cockburn's writing facile and very well-researched and good summary of 35-40 years of recent US history as seen..." Read more

6 customers mention "Readability"6 positive0 negative

Customers find the book engaging and interesting. They say it's a great read, even if it's painful.

"This entertaining and enlightening book by veteran journalist Andrew Cockburn goes a long way to explaining many of the most puzzling errors and..." Read more

"...after I read Mr. Rumsfeld memoir and although the book is written and read fluently, it occurred my mind that I have to receive a counter look to..." Read more

"...This book draws the conclusion for the reader. This book can be interesting if you take it with a grain of salt, but watch out for the brainwash..." Read more

"...This was a great, albeit painful read." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on March 16, 2007
    "I'm not into this detail stuff. I'm more concepty."

    "I don't do quagmires."

    "I don't do diplomacy."

    "I don't do foreign policy."

    "I don't do numbers."

    The above are direct quotes. They come directly out of America's corporate heartland from a man whose "accomplishment" at G. D Searle was in terrorizing the sort of people who don't matter and getting a sweetener approved that may cause brain tumors, destroying careers to do so.

    It has long been a right-wing fashion to blame government for everything, but the above make it clear that Rumsfeld was very much a creature of a corporate world which, during and directly after the Cold War, was expanding into an economic vacuum created by the Second World War, in which all that mattered was manipulating what other people thought.

    This world was so hegemonic that Job One, not only for the CEO but also for the white collar, became the capillary management of one's public relations image.

    "Reason" turned inside out and became strictly a matter of managing one's biography, and only fools and losers continued to be concerned with the external world.

    "Subjective" and "objective" reversed polarity. "Subjectivity" became a term of abuse hurled at unwanted results such as Shinseki's estimate of how many troops it would take to pacify Iraq. "Objectivity" becamse the name of success in maintaining one's reputation and the body count of careers destroyed to do so.

    The world was referred to as complex and unmanageable whenever the results from the field were negative. But any attempt to actually master complexity became to the province of little people trying, the night before the Big Presentation, to figure out how to survive Rumsfeld's illogical, off-topic, and incoherent objections. History became myth: a big man versus a little man, with Goliath the winner at all times, and Isaac sacrificed after all.

    Upon the accessing of Monkey Boy, things took a decided turn into utter absurdity. This book has GWB, well into his Presidency, asking his father what a "neocon" was. Other reports have Rove chairing discussions on how to cut Medicare and Medicaid by men who could not tell you the difference between these "entitlements". Rumsfeld himself was bone Midwestern ignorant at an early age and did not learn on the job: early in his career, he decided (using American business logic) that Paul Nitze, an archetypical Cold Warrior, must be soft on the Soviets because he knew so much about them, because in American business logic, knowing too much about any one thing is bad for the pure of heart generalist.

    This came about, with grievous consequences for America from the standpoint of national self-interest alone (such as the total loss of leadership of the home hemisphere), because in the USA, the Dialectic of Enlightenment, and Enlightenment's descent into biography, hagiography, demonology, haruspication, and myth, was at its most Power-Pointed advanced.

    Political life became for Players a sort of blood sport with invisible umpires nonetheless presumed to be there, in the peanut gallery of the press and poll.

    Of course, no poll could have been conducted prior to March 2003 to haruspicate the reaction of the Iraqi people to the Americans barging in. For one thing, Saddam would have had a fit. For another, the barging-in rendered moot for Iraqis whatever they may have felt before the war, for owing to Rumsfeld's incompetence and malignity, not one-tenth of the riches perhaps anticipated showed up for the Iraqis. Instead, the country became a hell on earth.

    Rumsfeld knew this, if he knew little else despite his expensive stay at Princeton (not graced to my knowledge except by wrestling stardom, when Rumsfeld could have wrestled at the "Rock Welcomes You" gym on Van Buren Street around the time of his matriculation, and hopefully got his neck broken, saving us a lot of trouble and the taxpayers alone a lot of money).

    He was of a generation accustomed to having its own way in the world. If Aspartame would make them look good, then Aspartame had to be approved by the FDA. If an underpowered invasion would give him the status of a Douglas Macarthur, then that invasion had to proceed.

    3000 American service personnel are dead as a result. 24000 are wounded and according to recent reports many of them rot in corridors at Walter Reed. Several hundred thousand Iraqis are dead.

    It's almost ungrammatical of Cockburn to say that Rumsfeld accepts responsibility but not blame: it may be that he would accept blame but not responsibility. A man so uncaring of people has a concomitant lack of care for language except to manipulate and to bully, so Rumsfeld would split what Derrida would call the diferance either way.

    This man is now in a comfortable retirement. He needs to lose this package pronto. He needs to end his days in a Federal prison, and given the damage he has done, it is a great pity that Donald Rumsfeld is too old to have to worry therein about homosexual rape. He personally monitored and personally authorized unconstitutional torture of suspects including Lindh, the American picked up in Afghanistan and he personally, with a bully's smirk doubtless on his face, gave troops license for what happened at Abu Ghraib.

    This is a man who has never grown up. He plays boy's games and goes on whitewater rafting trips to prove a manhood he never once had. His gaze at Searle and at the Pentagon was, basilisk like, intended to suck not only the air from conference rooms but the very possibility of post-Enlightenment manhood.

    If there's any chance of getting the sum wrong, he doesn't do numbers. If he might be seen as missing a detail he is concepty. He doesn't "do" foreign policy, and he snubs the Chinese military attache when that gentleman has valuable information on Afghanistan (and, probably, losing Osama thereby): he doesn't "do" diplomacy because it's hard work. This man is a child.

    But, the American people enabled his conduct and should hang their co-alcoholic, co-dysfunctional heads in shame: for that's what Rumsfeld used. He was the uncle who rapes the daughter, and the daughter is the one who is condemned as shrill.

    His conduct augurs nothing good for the USA, and possibly, its descent into civil war when economic decline and environmental destruction set in a few short years from now.

    Late in life, Barry Goldwater said of his fellow Republicans: when I think of these men I get sick to my stomach and I want to throw up. When I think of Donald Rumsfeld I get sick to my stomach and I want to throw up.
    26 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2007
    This entertaining and enlightening book by veteran journalist Andrew Cockburn goes a long way to explaining many of the most puzzling errors and bizarre misjudgments that have bedeviled the US military during the Bush Administration. In turns amusing and depressing, "Rumsfeld: His Rise, Fall, and Catastrophic Legacy" is the most useful guide yet published on the mismanagement that has all but crippled the most powerful military force in the world. One would hope that the lessons implicit in this book would be learned by future Administrations and policy makers. I'm not holding my breath.
    5 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2007
    I had wondered if President Bush was the guiding hand in the bumbling execution of his administration. After reading Cockburn's book, I think Bush's critical weakness as President is in choosing incompetent subordinates. Rumsfeld's catastrophic management of the war in Iraq appears to be driven by his own ambitions and, sadly, by his avoidence of blame. To be blamed for this kind of failure, of course, would ruin his chances of ever becoming President himself. And so from the very start of the war, he maneuvered himself into being Bush's confidante, pushing out and isolating advisors like Colin Powell and the Joint Chiefs. At the same time, he made decisions, or rather avoided being responsible for decisions and nondecisions that doomed the war effort. Even if Cockburn's analysis is only 90 per cent accurate, the country will pay for generations for the stupidity (there is no better word) and guile of this inept Secretary of Defense.
    9 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on September 25, 2015
    This is a bad book: one sided, intends to harm even if there is no real reason for it and describes the history of one person in an unreliable way. I decided to purchase this book after I read Mr. Rumsfeld memoir and although the book is written and read fluently, it occurred my mind that I have to receive a counter look to Mr. Rumsfeld book and perspective and decided to purchase this book. What a disappointment!!- Yes, the facts are mostly correct but, the interpretation is so one sided that the whole book is received as non-true. The author goes so very far that he even mocks Mr. Rumsfeld being short (in comparison to other candidates). The psychologic profile described is shallow and I wonder if the writer has any education in this field, which allows him to do so. You just feel that the author is going as far as he can to find defects, mistakes, conflict of interest and wrongdoing in each and every decision taken by Mr. Rumsfeld. It is so untrue that it deserves zero but, being nice, I will give him one.
  • Reviewed in the United States on August 13, 2010
    This is definately an interesting topic, and the book raises cogent arguments. However, as a reader that values facts over opinion, this book is a little over the top. I admit I didn't (and will not) take the time to cross reference every end note, as most seem accurate, but some feel out of context. There are many quotes throughout the book that are not cited, which is concerning, because this book has a very strong anti-Rumsfeld bias. Being largely unfamilar with the topic and looking to get educated with a book, I felt that the author overpowers the reader with his disdain for the subject, and attempts to steer you toward a similar conclusion. Side note - the author makes reference to US Air Force EP-3 aircraft, which is an oversight, as the USAF does not fly EP-3's - they're in the Navy.

    I prefer books to lay out the facts and let the reader decide. This book draws the conclusion for the reader. This book can be interesting if you take it with a grain of salt, but watch out for the brainwash effect.
    16 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Andy
    1.0 out of 5 stars Avoid
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 29, 2019
    I bought this at the same time as "Days of Fire", by Peter Baker, which covers the Bush/Cheney Whitehouse years. The two books are chalk and cheese. The Baker book is a dispassionate, well-considered and well written account that is based on serious research and interviews with most of the participants over the eight year period. Rumsfeld is of course also covered in that book. I'm not a right wing fan, and had tended towards the commonly held opinions on the left about Bush and the neo-cons, but that book both toned down my opinion of Bush (to the point where I now consider him to be a perfectly decent kind of guy) and confirmed my feelings about Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz et al, in that I see them as totally convinced in their, to me mistaken, worldview also.

    This book however, has all the appeal of a juvenile rant. I tried to get past that feeling a couple of times but never got more than a few pages in. The constant use of "quotes" is the real giveaway. All sorts of "unnecessary" adjectives or "phrases" get put in quotation marks. I can almost see the "author" using air quotes as he expounds to his buddies in the bar. It's a form of juvenile sarcasm as far as I'm concerned, and it makes the book a waste of fallen trees (or electrons if you're thinking about the Kindle version). I suspect the truth about Rumsfeld doesn't really need sarcasm, and I was hoping for a more dispassionate read.

    My copy of this went into the re-cyling bin.
  • Client d'Amazon
    5.0 out of 5 stars Biographie politique critique
    Reviewed in France on October 6, 2016
    Excellent analyse du désastre que fut Rumsfeld pour la société américaine et pour le monde. Un sadique qui supervisait les séances de torture à partir de son bureau.
  • Save the Planet. Stop Climate Change!
    4.0 out of 5 stars A highly critical and well-informed look at Rumsfeld's career
    Reviewed in Germany on September 18, 2014
    Readable, informative and concise - a critical assessment of Rumsfeld' s career in- and outside government backed up by lots of insider information. Focuses on Rumsfeld's second term as secretary of defense (2001-2006).