Valentine's Day gifts for her from Shopbop
To share your reaction on this item, open the Amazon app from the App Store or Google Play on your phone.
Buy used:
$5.67
$3.98 delivery February 4 - 5. Details
Or fastest delivery January 30 - February 4. Details
Used: Good | Details
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Item in good condition. Textbooks may not include supplemental items i.e. CDs, access codes etc...
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Consilience: the Unity of Knowledge Hardcover – Import, January 1, 1998

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 425 ratings

One of our greatest living scientists--and the winner of two Pulitzer Prizes for On Human Nature and The Ants--gives us a work of visionary importance that may be the crowning achievement of his career. In Consilience (a word that originally meant "jumping together"), Edward O. Wilson renews the Enlightenment's search for a unified theory of knowledge in disciplines that range from physics to biology, the social sciences and the humanities.Using the natural sciences as his model, Wilson forges dramatic links between fields. He explores the chemistry of the mind and the genetic bases of culture. He postulates the biological principles underlying works of art from cave-drawings to Lolita. Presenting the latest findings in prose of wonderful clarity and oratorical eloquence, and synthesizing it into a dazzling whole, Consilience is science in the path-clearing traditions of Newton, Einstein, and Richard Feynman.
The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
425 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book insightful and thought-provoking. They describe it as an enjoyable, stimulating read with a powerful writing style. Readers praise the author's articulate prose and language.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

37 customers mention "Thought provoking"34 positive3 negative

Customers find the book insightful and full of thought-provoking ideas. They appreciate the opportunity for basic and advanced research to integrate the humanities, social sciences, and philosophy. The book explores the possibilities of synthesis between the various branches of study from the hard sciences to the soft sciences. Readers mention that the author's mind and vision are refreshing.

"...The final chapter seems to say "Consilience is important. It is crucially important to every field of endeavor...." Read more

"Another important text from EO Wilson - father of sociobiology" Read more

"...Wilson, is a masterful narrative of an amazing width of topics: science history, biology, Brain Sciences, Ecology, even an eloquant crticism of Post..." Read more

"In this seminal and ambitious book, professor EO Wilson works to show the need and lays the foundation for the integration of the sciences and the..." Read more

21 customers mention "Readability"21 positive0 negative

Customers find the book enjoyable and stimulating. They say it's worth reading and a classic. The content is thought-provoking and challenging, but there is enough depth to keep them engaged after just a few chapters.

"...And I'm a very tough critic. This is a monumental book that is mandatory reading for any person who cares about how science might inform any of a..." Read more

"...In this book, Wilson proved himself one of the greatest writers of Popular science - lucid, clear, and often funny...." Read more

"In this seminal and ambitious book, professor EO Wilson works to show the need and lays the foundation for the integration of the sciences and the..." Read more

"...The book is not too thick that you're discouraged but there's enough content and depth in there to keep your attention." Read more

21 customers mention "Writing style"18 positive3 negative

Customers enjoy the book's writing style. They find it articulate, provocative, and engaging. The author is described as a skilled writer with powerful prose and rich vocabulary. Readers consider the book worth reading and praise the author for being bold in his thinking.

"...Wilson's knowledge is deep and wide. His reasoning is lucid, his prose articulate...." Read more

"Consilience, a book by biologist Edward O. Wilson, is a masterful narrative of an amazing width of topics: science history, biology, Brain Sciences,..." Read more

"This man wrote some amazing works...." Read more

"...The book is articulate, provocative, and covers a wide spectrum of ideas, but I didn't find all the arguments particularly persuasive...." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on November 18, 2005
    Wilson observes the history of biology. First there was the systemmatic categorization of life forms under Linneus. Then there was the notion of fitness and evolution by Darwin. That this could happen was supported by work on heredity done by Mendeleev. Finally, Watson and Crick developed the structure of DNA. This made it possible to anchor all of biology's observations in the realm of physical sciences. The structures and metabolic processes of cells could be derived from this work. And the functions of organs. And the organization of complex individuals. This alignment, this vision of coherence from the lowest level fundamental laws up through higher and higher levels of complexity, this view that all the highest level processes can ultimately be explained by low level processes is what we understand Wilson to mean by CONSILIENCE.

    Wilson's has seen how profoundly consilience has altered biological science in his lifetime. And he argues in this book that a lot of other fields of endeavor might be improved by an analogous transformation: psychology, economics, sociology, and the arts. He makes a number of very intersting points.

    The biggest conceptual problem I have with the book is that Wilson skates around the problems of knowability. He views the world as being ultimately knowable. But those who have a bit of knowledge about quantum physics, turbulent fluid flow, Goedel's incompleteness theorem, or chaos theory understand that many systems that can be described with great accuracy cannot be predicted very well. There's a lot that we cannot know. It's not very clear how consilience's bound's are affected by this limit, for Wilson does not go there.

    But this is not a problem that should ever keep someone from reading the book. Wilson's knowledge is deep and wide. His reasoning is lucid, his prose articulate. It might be a slight exaggeration to say the book is a steady stream of quotable passages on biology, science, art, knowledge, ethics, religion, and culture; but only a slight one. Almost eighty post-it notes mark the passages in my own copy that I find worthy of quotation. And I'm a very tough critic. This is a monumental book that is mandatory reading for any person who cares about how science might inform any of a host of other human endeavors.

    There are few areas of human study left untouched by WIlson's analysis. Most of it is hopeful and optimistic; but Wilson airs a number of concerns in the last chapter. Here he talks about the biological future of man and how it is limited by resources. He recounts peaks we have already passed, such as the peak in food production in 1987. He shows how burgeoning populations in the face of limited resources either collapse entirely (the model described by Diamond ) or go through the throes of murderous wars ( the Rwanda model described here) . The final chapter seems to say "Consilience is important. It is crucially important to every field of endeavor. And if we trace population dynamics back to the fundamental laws using ideas from consilience, we will soon discover that this field of study more than any other desparately needs the illuminating effects offered by this approach. Like a pack of hyenas eying a single child on the savannah at dusk, the problems are staring at us. They are undeniable. They will not go away. The longer we turn our back on them, the more desperately we risk losing everything to them."
    20 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2024
    Another important text from EO Wilson - father of sociobiology
  • Reviewed in the United States on January 29, 2003
    Consilience, a book by biologist Edward O. Wilson, is a masterful narrative of an amazing width of topics: science history, biology, Brain Sciences, Ecology, even an eloquant crticism of Post Modernism. In this book, Wilson proved himself one of the greatest writers of Popular science - lucid, clear, and often funny.
    But Consilience is more than just a popular science book. It is a call for a new kind of science - a unified discipline, a thread of knowledge leading from physics, through the key element of biological evolution, to the social sciences and even the humanities, art, religion, and the ecology.
    In a sense, Consilience is very similar to Daniel Dennet's Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Both books deal with a huge array of items, also categorized as a chain leading from Physics to Ethics (and, in Dennet's case to God - or to the inexsistence of God. Wilson, more modest, stops at religion, and leaves a place for some sort of a deity in his cosmology). Ultimately, although Wilson's prose is superior, and some of his ideas are wonderful (especially early in the book. I loved the suggestion that Logical Positivism can be saved through biological information on how the brain works. There is a paradox there, but it is an approach to the question I never considered), Dennet's book is more considered and is the better of the two.
    The reason for that is, as a scientific program, rather than as an ideology, Consilience doesn't hold water. First, the term is incredibly unclear. Sometimes, in its strong form, Consilience really is a call for one science, explaining a phenomena in all levels, from the human action to the evolutionary explanation for this phenomena, and finally to the physics behind the biology.
    But one is struck by how little Wilson actually explains through this. His examples are remarkably minor. He can trace dreaming about Snakes to old world primates innate fear, and he explains which color words will be more frequant then others (black and white tend to be higher up the hirarchy then Orange - hmm), but no explanation to any discrete historical event is ever offered. Does Consilience, in this strong regard, has anything to say about Keyensian economics? Can you trace the fall of the Weimar republic back to physics? Do we understand Hitchcock's movies better through an evolutionary perspective on human motives like greed and love? I don't think so.
    Then, sometimes consilience means only that different disciplines should engage in dialogue. There's nothing objectionable in that, but it is far from tearing down the discipline barriers. And it is constantly done anyway - the latest winner of the Noble price in economics won it for work in psychology.
    Wilson's Consilience keeps switching between these two extremes. Part of the problem, in my view, is that Wilson over emphasizes the links between the different levels of explanation. In particular, in the 'nature vs. nurture', debate, Wilson clearly believes everything is in the genes.
    Wilson constantly denies that he believes in genetic determinism. Strictly speaking, that is true, but if Wilson closes a door by allowing for culture, he opens a window by talking about predisposition - human culture works based on preexisting biological directions ("epigenetic rules") - it intensifies and elaborates them, but rarely or never ignores them. That's an interesting twist, but it amounts to little but a longer road to the same destination.
    Ultimately, the greatest problem I had with Consilience is that it isn't pragmatic. Yes, Unity is a wonderful thing (and despite my reservations, I tend to agree to that), but how do we get there? Wilson offers very little concrete steps. At the end, Consilience leaves you with a vivid description of the impending ecologic crisis, and a warm fuzzy feeling that consilience can solve it - but with very little about how consilience will be achieved, or indeed, what it means exactly.
    I don't want to end my review in such a sour note. Wilson's prose is powerful, and he is a fascinating thinker. Even if I don't agree with him, the vision is provocative and fascinating, and in a sense, that is the greatest compliment possible.
    26 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Jas
    5.0 out of 5 stars a real masterpiece
    Reviewed in Canada on June 27, 2022
    This is not for the faint of heart: this is a very dense book to read. You need to think as you absorb its contents, and it will certainly make you think. It is well and convincingly written. I recommend it
  • Cristofer
    3.0 out of 5 stars Worth the read, but the book’s physical quality is not the best there is.
    Reviewed in Spain on September 6, 2024
    The author makes compelling, informed, and interesting arguments in favour of the idea of consilience, that there can be a theory of everything, and that different disciplines can benefit from interacting more with each other. Although it can be confused with regular reductionism, another alternative would be informed reductionism.

    When the author refers to philosophy, the biophobia, and postmodernist, it is strangely contemporary. It begs the question on whether the warnings were listened to at all. The weakest part of the book, in my estimation, were the last two chapters. Strangely moved by dreams of Utopia at times, dismissing the other’s side argument whilst making the same or failing to understand that they are the same.

    To some extent, regrettably, the author unwillingly shows the flaw of consilience, its reductionism. Either because he is an entomologist, or because he is using biology as starting place for many places, it quickly becomes the most important subject. The animal world is complicated, yes, but human psychology, and the human world is and isn’t. This difficulty is most clearly shown when the economy and culture are addresses.

    I’m keeping the review intentionally vague. Whether the person that reads it agrees or not, I hope it only happens after reading the book.

    This physical copy of the book is not very durable, and the sheet quality isn’t that good. The book’s content is still very good, and worth the read.
  • fabiop84
    1.0 out of 5 stars Boring
    Reviewed in Italy on September 30, 2023
  • Alí Sánchez
    5.0 out of 5 stars Bien
    Reviewed in Mexico on September 9, 2019
    Llegó en buenas condiciones y a tiempo
  • PF
    5.0 out of 5 stars Great reading
    Reviewed in India on August 23, 2019
    Nice book