| Print List Price: | $35.00 |
| Kindle Price: | $10.99 Save $24.01 (69%) |
| includes VAT* | |
| Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Absent Superpower: The Shale Revolution and a World Without America Kindle Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
- Kindle
$9.99 Read with Our Free App -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your 3-Month Audible trial - Hardcover
$35.0036 Used from $13.48 17 New from $26.98
The world is changing in ways most of us find incomprehensible. Terrorism spills out of the Middle East into Europe. Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, China and Japan vie to see who can be most aggressive. Financial breakdown in Asia and Europe guts growth, challenging hard-won political stability.
Yet for the Americans, these changes are fantastic. Alone among the world's powers, only the United States is geographically wealthy, demographically robust, and energy secure. That last piece -- American energy security -- is rapidly emerging as the most critical piece of the global picture.
The American shale revolution does more than sever the largest of the remaining ties that bind America's fate to the wider world. It re-industrializes the United States, accelerates the global order's breakdown, and triggers a series of wide ranging military conflicts that will shape the next two decades. The common theme? Just as the global economy tips into chaos, just as global energy becomes dangerous, just as the world really needs the Americans to be engaged, the United States will be...absent.
In 2014's The Accidental Superpower, geopolitical strategist Peter Zeihan made the case that geographic, demographic and energy trends were unravelling the global system. Zeihan takes the story a step further in The Absent Superpower, mapping out the threats and opportunities as the world descends into Disorder.
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJanuary 29, 2017
- File size16330 KB
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In 2014 Zeihan anticipated that as the U.S. is becoming self-sufficient on all counts, its foreign policy will become more isolationist and protectionist (anti-trade. The U.S. will become less (financially) supportive of NATO and worldwide maritime routes security (end of Bretton Woods era). Three years later everything Zeihan anticipated did occur. And, it can be summed up in one word: Trump! Zeihan indicated in his newsletter that if Hillary had won the election, the U.S. policy path would be identical but carried out at a slower pace.
Within “The Accidental Superpower” Zeihan explored the fate of various countries and supranational entities including Russia, China, Japan, Europe and the Euro Zone in particular. In each case, their respective situation for one or more geographical and demographic factors is far less favorable than for the U.S. making unlikely that another hegemon will rise to replace the U.S.
By the time, Zeihan published his first book Saudi Arabia undertook an aggressive oil price war by pumping oil supply and lowering oil prices at time down to the low $40s. It was perceived that this was to bankrupt the U.S. shale oil industry. And, it seemed to be successful as many shale oil operations shut down at least temporarily.
So, now over two years later Zeihan comes with an update “The Absent Super Power.” However, while his first book was focused on water ways (a factor ignored by the international economics literature), he is now focusing on U.S. shale oil as the subtitle of the book indicates.
In the first part of the book Zeihan indicates how the U.S. shale oil industry experienced a drastic improvement in efficiency in response to the Saudis oil price war. On page 46, he shares a graph that indicates the U.S. shale oil industry lowered its breakeven point from $90 per barrel in 2012 down to $40 in 2017. Its breakeven point is now lower than for the U.S. traditional oil industry! And, it has matched Russia, a low cost oil producer. Only Saudi Arabia has a markedly lower breakeven point at around $25. Other OPEC countries are in the mid $30s (not much lower than U.S. shale). One should keep in mind that Saudi Arabia’s oil operations can break even at $25, however its’ fiscal balance requires oil prices closer to a $100 to avoid running large Budget Deficits. At $25, Saudi Arabia’s Budget Deficit would probably be over 20% of GDP.
U.S. shale oil has improved its efficiency by developing new technologies including micro-seismic exploration and multilateral drilling that leverages Big Data live information. The improved technology allows the industry to improve its success rate and efficiency. Because of those improvements, even though the industry was closing down many shale operations during the price war, the remaining survivors produced a lot more oil per rig than ever before (graph pg. 29). And, the overall shale oil output held up (see graph pg. 67).
U.S. shale exploration guarantees a low cap on U.S. oil price and an abundance of low cost natural gas. And, the latter is associated with abundant electricity generation at a lower cost than major OECD competitors. This is an advantage that may contribute to the reindustralisation of the U.S. And, lower energy costs (petroleum and natural gas) have implications affecting numerous part of the consumer, chemical, pharmaceutical, and industrial product sectors (diagram on pg. 63).
U.S. shale energy is based on numerous competitive advantages that include geology (maritime shale is easier to extract than lacustrine shale), law (U.S. is among few countries that fully implement private mineral rights), labor specialization (largest body of proficient engineers specializing in shale exploration), capital availability (best risk capital infrastructure), and as mentioned the best shale energy exploration technology. Those competitive advantages are not fully replicable anywhere else. Thus, the U.S. is likely to remain the leader in this sector for a very long time.
As a consequence of the emergence of U.S. shale oil, the international oil markets will fragment into at least two (if not more) separate markets: a) a US domestic one where prices will be chronically low and not volatile; and b) the traditional international one where prices will be a lot more volatile and have frequent spikes at or above $100 even $150 associated with Gulf crisis, wars, etc.
In the second and main part of the book, Zeihan describes “The Disorder” where he describes the falling apart of the existing Bretton Woods era. Per Zeihan, the World Order is going to fracture along three sets of wars that he defines as: 1) the Twilight War; 2) the Next Gulf War; and 3) the Tanker War.
In the Twilight War, he describes how Russia in order to preempt its unfortunate geography (flat and vulnerable to attacks) and demography (rapidly shrinking population) will attempt to rebuild the USSR by either invading or controlling former satellite countries (he designates 11 such countries on pg. 138). Russia has started on this venture with Georgia, and Ukraine. But, it will want to venture as far into Western Europe as part of Poland! By attempting this land grab, Russia will have much friction with both Scandinavia and Turkey; but such prospective conflicts will experience stalemate without shift in borders or control from existing arrangements.
The Next Gulf War is really about the tension between Iran (Shiites) and Saudi Arabia (Sunnis) who both compete for supremacy in the Region. And, the U.S. will stop policing the area as it becomes increasingly energy independent. The U.S. very soon will not need Saudi Arabia anymore as the U.S. imports are steadily declining. And, whatever oil it imports comes a lot more from Canada and a lot less from Saudi Arabia. Zeihan reveals that the Saudis oil price war started in 2014 was not so much or only aimed at the U.S. shale oil industry; but, it was particularly aimed at Iran. When oil revenues drop because of lower oil prices, both countries run huge Budget Deficits in the 10% to 15% range of GDP. And, the Saudis have a lot more cash reserves than Iran. The Saudis can afford such Deficits for years, Iran can’t. Meanwhile, Iran has superior military capabilities and will attempt to reconquer portions of the Persian Empire. The tension and conflict between Iran and Saudi Arabia will trigger collateral damage throughout the region. “several of the Middle Eastern countries … will lose so much industrial, electrical, and agricultural capacity that they will … de-civilize. Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Yemen, Lebanon … will lose the ability to maintain populations more than one-third their current size.” (pg. 208).
The Tanker War is about oil importing countries waging maritime operations and wars to protect their access to oil energy. Those operations will take place in the Far East. And, Japan will play a preponderant role thanks to its strong navy. “Destroy global free trade, unleash the Japanese, and the end of China is nigh… Simply put, the days of China Inc. and Factory Asia are over.” (pg. 258-259). The tension between China and Japan in protecting their respective access to oil energy will affect the entire Far East. The region will be plagued by far higher energy prices/costs than any others because it is so much more energy dependent. Zeihan frequently refers to the “Asian premium.”
The last chapter of the Part II: Disorder is on the international private major companies. Once again the Americans (ExxonMobil and Chevron) are the dominant players in technology, global reach, and capital. By contrast BP has been pretty much wiped out in the aftermath of its Deepwater Horizon oil rig disaster in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.
Near the end of the book, Zeihan describes how the U.S. will engage (relatively minimally) in the World. He describes the U.S. foreign policy as “Dollar diplomacy.”
The U.S. will implement its Dollar diplomacy with Southeast Asia and Australia and New Zealand. The U.S. will continue to maintain close trade and direct investment ties with this region to recreate supply chains to replace or diversify away from relying on China’s manufacturing.
During the Disorder’s China manufacturing capacity may weaken significantly as the country experiences a convergence of crises including a debt crisis, a bank credit crisis, an aging population and shrinking labor force crisis, and much geopolitical frictions (the Tanker War).
The U.S. will use its Dollar diplomacy throughout Latin America. The region has substantial energy assets including a promising shale oil area in Argentina. But, because of mismanagement the region has not properly utilized those energy assets. The U.S. brings the technology, security, management know-how, and logistics assistance. The U.S. will shift also some of its former supply chains away from China towards Latin America. The U.S. is by far the largest consumer market that will remain a viable trading partner during the Disorder. And, Latin America needs the income that will be generated by the U.S. Dollar diplomacy to repay its foreign debt and feed its people. In summary, Latin America will have no choice but to accept the U.S. terms on their joint energy exploration.
In the appendices of the book, Zeihan addresses environmental concerns associated with shale oil. Within this section he conveys a couple of fascinating facts. On pg. 385, he shares a graph that depicts a time series of the estimated temperature increase caused by a doubling of CO2 based on studies completed between 2001 and 2014. And, back in 2001 this estimated temperature increase ranged from + 2.5 to 4.0 degree Celsius. The more recent estimates have shrunk it down to + 1.5 to 2 degree Celsius. That’s a huge difference. Later in this section, he reviews the prospect of renewables (wind, solar). And, they are just not scalable enough to make much of a dent in the overall energy mix. Those energy sources are intermittent, not easily storable and transmissible. Only a small fraction of the earth provides favorable conditions for either. He sees as a more realistic path to reduce CO2 emission the increasing substitution of coal with natural gas (to generate electricity) and increasing energy efficiency.
I have a few rebuttals to Zeihan’s theories.
First, Zeihan’s main point is that the U.S. is now pretty much a self-sufficient economy that does not need much to trade with other nations. Therefore, it does not need to maintain the supranational Bretton Woods order (NATO, security of maritime routes, etc.). However, when looking at the Bureau of Economic Analysis time series focusing on the trade of goods only (not services) imports have risen from 1.6% of GDP in 1942 to 12.7% in 2015. Similarly, exports of goods have risen over the same period from 1.6% to 8.3%. This is not an isolationist nation, but instead one that is increasingly becoming a hub of industrial design whereby the actual goods are manufactured and assembled out of the U.S. By the same token, the U.S. runs a resulting chronic large Current Account Deficit. As a result, foreigners hold a substantial portion of U.S. Treasuries. In summary, economic trends suggests the U.S. is increasingly codependent with the World in both international trade and international capital flows. Those are not bad things, but they run in opposite direction of Zeihan’s theoretical foundation.
Now, focusing on the U.S. energy independence. Even using Zeihan’s own compiled data, I found divergence. On pg. 406, his data conveys the U.S. only produces 65% of the crude oil and natural gas it consumes. Using Zeihan’s numbers, even if we assume Canada would commit 100% of its exports to the U.S. it would fill less than half that gap. It is difficult to come up with a precise estimate, but I suspect that US production + Canada’s imports equal less than 80% of U.S. consumption. “Energy independence” is somewhat premature.
Another chronic weakness of the U.S. is its deteriorating fiscal outlook. The U.S. over the next couple of decades will face structural unsustainable yearly Budget Deficits in the 4%+ range that will rapidly grow the U.S. Debt/GDP ratio uncontrollably (Congressional Budget Office is a good source on the topic). The Government has been aware of this situation for over three decades and has done nothing to resolve it. Similarly, at the State and local level finances are strained (Pension crisis). Infrastructure is not well maintained (electricity grid, bridges, roads). Zeihan ignores entirely those fiscal weaknesses at all levels of U.S. Government.
Another weakness is the U.S. consistently poor showing in international education standards comparison (PISA). This has to result in a shortage of American engineers, mathematicians, and scientists that has unfavorable implication in the current Big Data-Artificial Intelligence race. It would appear key for the U.S. to remain open to immigrants with human capital. However, the current political discourse does not seem favorable to that.
Despite the few rebuttals mentioned above, I give the book a 4-star rating for the originality of the argument and the depth of the research.
I've not seen analysis like this except in two places. Stratfor news and the information put out by Dr. Jack Wheeler. I've found he worked for Stratfor as the Vice President of Analysis and left to form his own company in 2012 called Zeihan on Geopolitics, which explains the similarities.
That was the appetizer, now for the main course.
He proposes, and very well I might add, fracking has changed the geopolitical dynamics dramatically, and will continue to do so even more in the future. His book starts out explaining fracking, how it's done, how it has improved technologically, and how the costs related to fracking have dropped to the point where prices being charged by Saudi Arabia will no longer matter. Recently he publish an article showing how the figure he states in the book is now ever dramatically lower. Fracking is changing the world, and he breaks this down into three sections.
In Part I, Shale New World, he describes how fracking works, and I've asked around, and for a layman he's spot on, except I don't think you can get a pipe to turn 90 degrees. Otherwise - I now know more about fracking than I ever expected to. For those of us who aren't all that interested in the techie stuff is a bit boring, but it's essential as foundation for the rest of the book.
Part II is called "The Disorder", which includes what he terms The Twilight War, the (Next) Gulf War, The Tanker War, The Sweet Sixteen and It's a Supermajor World.
Part III is The American Play with chapters on "Tools of the Trade", "Dollar Diplomacy in Southeast Asia", "Dollar Diplomacy in Latin America" and "Shale New World".
I'm totally impressed with the background research he's done on all the problems the world is facing. For years I've understood the importance of geography and demography in the world geopolitics, but I never fully appreciated both until reading his books. However, there are some caveats to my enthusiastic review.
First, he goes on to explain what a mess Putin is facing in Russia and then goes on to claim, without foundation, Putin has stashed billions of dollars no one knows about in order to attack Eastern Europe at some unknown time for some unknown reason.
His analysis of what would happen if America walks away, leaving Europe to defend itself alone, is I think spot on, but in both books it's clear Russia is breeding itself out of existence, the economy is on the verge of collapse and their military is a mess with the exception of their special forces. I see no earthly reason why Russia would want to attack anyone that would require a full out effort. Furthermore, dictators don't stash money away to attack someone. They do it to run away and live in luxury. So why is the brilliant man saying this? I will deal with that further.
His analysis of South America and Latin America is so well done it gives you an entirely different view of why these countries are where they are economically. Because of South America's geography there is nowhere near the amount of trade you would expect among them, but neither have there been many wars. His analysis as to future American diplomatic and economic policy to Latin and South America is eye opening.
He's made it clear there's no other nation on the Earth that has the geographical advantages like the United States, assuring economic success, except Argentina, which in the 1920's was one of the richest nations on the Earth, until the socialists took over. His work clearly demonstrates why countries who adopt socialist policies turn poor countries into cesspools and rich countries like Argentina into a mess. It will be interesting to watch our Southern neighbors make major changes with regard to the United States, or face economic problems that will become insurmountable.
All of Asia's problems will center around energy, transporting it safely, and where it's going to come from. His analysis of China's military capability is impressive in demonstrating they're really good at putting on a big show, but the reality of their geography, demography, economics and a true evaluation of their military capability to impose their will outside their own nation is limited, including use of their naval forces. Japan will become a much bigger player militarily in that arena when the U.S. becomes more - well, let's say judiciously isolationist. In short - if there's no benefit there will be no involvement. You may find Australia's role in all of this interesting, especially since he clearly believes American, Australian and New Zealand involvement won't deminish nearly as much as it will with the rest of the world.
I don't agree with is his views on Global Warming. He states in the book some criticize him for being a liberal and some for being a conservative. In explaining his views on Global Warming it demonstrates he's a liberal - he says so - which I find interesting since there are two things liberals hate more than anything. History and facts, and he excels at both.
However, it explains his hard take on more Russian aggression, Global Warming and failing to deal with the two most important movements in world events, the Muslim invasion into the west, and the efforts by the United Nations to create a one world government, and promoting the Anthropogenic Global Warming fruad is essential for them to attain that end. All of which are tenets of current leftist theology. He's too well researched and too intelligent to not be aware of all of this and the facts surrounding it all. And I ask why would a man that brilliant be a liberal?
So do I recommend reading his book? Absolutely!
I would give it five stars on history, five stars on current events, five stars on analysis and four on conclusions. When reading his books you will gain insights needed to understand why the world works the way it does, and allow you to become even more aware of how worthless the media really is. After gaining those insights you can draw your own conclusions, and you may or may not choose to accept his. However, there is one thing that really bugs me, there's no index in this book
But no matter, I think both of his books are - as they say on one of the TV movie channels - "The Essentials".
Top reviews from other countries
When the book first came out, many lauded its (honestly) awesome maps, its analysis, but kind of ... panned the whole "U.S. disengaging thing". Even Stratfor founder George Friedman did not go as far as to say that the U.S. had almost no ties to the world at large (even if his argument that American power is rooted in fundamentals that are almost invulnerable kind of leads to the same point).
How the world has changed since 2014 (when The Accidental Superpower came out).
Regardless of how you see Mssr. Trump, the man has brought the cold, harsh light of American self-interest out of the closet and into the polite society of international relations.
The Absent Superpower continues the idea of U.S. retrenchment and withdrawal from the world at large in the Age of Trump, and it is a blast to read. The maps are awesome, and the detailed breakdown of shale oil reminds me of some of my first year engineering textbooks; complex and a bit hard to chew at first, but gradually helping you earn an understanding of the systems that run the world.
Give it a read. While I humbly think some of the predictions in the book are a bit starker than reality dictates (Japan will engage in a tanker war with S. Korea and or China? - yikes, I need to mull this over), it does not pay to underestimate Zeihan's thought process. At the very least, you get to watch a superbly smart man breakdown how the world actually works, and not the way we might want it to work (or continue).
5 stars!
This is a book packed to the brim with information. I recommend it for anyone interested in geopolitics and global economics.






