Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Wealth of Nature: Environmental History and the Ecological Imagination Hardcover – April 8, 1993
| Price | New from | Used from |
humanity's interaction with nature to the forefront of historical thinking. Now, in The Wealth of Nature, he offers a series of thoughtful, eloquent essays which lay out his views on environmental history, tying the study of the past to today's agenda for change.
The Wealth of Nature captures the fruit of what Worster calls "my own intellectual turning to the land." History, he writes, represents a dialogue between humanity and nature--though it is usually reported as if it were simple dictation. Worster takes as his point of departure the approach
expressed early on by Aldo Leopold, who stresses the importance of nature in determining human history; Leopold pointed out that the spread of bluegrass in Kentucky, for instance, created new pastures and fed the rush of American settlers across the Appalachians, which affected the contest between
Britain, France, and the U.S. for control of the area. Worster's own work offers an even more subtly textured understanding, noting in this example, for instance, that bluegrass itself was an import from the Old World which supplanted native vegetation--a form of "environmental imperialism." He
ranges across such areas as agriculture, water development, and other questions, examining them as environmental issues, showing how they have affected--and continue to affect--human settlement. Environmental history, he argues, is not simply the history of rural and wilderness areas; cities clearly
have a tremendous impact on the land, on which they depend for their existence. He argues for a comprehensive approach to understanding our past as well as our present in environmental terms.
"Nostalgia runs all through this society," Worster writes, "fortunately, for it may be our only hope of salvation." These reflective and engaging essays capture the fascination of environmental history--and the beauty of nature lost or endangered--underscoring the importance of intelligent
action in the present.
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateApril 8, 1993
- Dimensions6.25 x 1.25 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100195076249
- ISBN-13978-0195076240
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Top reviews from other countries
The text is composed of sixteen wide ranging essays. These essays seek to reinterpret "traditional" anthropocentric history by taking into account nature, a critical component missing from most history, he argues. He is critical of most historical narratives for not including nature as perhaps the most important variable in the stories of the evolution of humanity. Worster is particularly critical of the division of academic disciplines between the sciences and the humanities, and how this balkanization of thought and morality has "damaged ... planet Earth"(pp. 19-20). While Worster is in agreement with most environmental historians in viewing nature as largely a human construct (i.e. William Cronon), he argues there was a certain order to nature - particularly in North America before the arrival of Europeans. He does not argue for excluding humans from nature, but instead for including nature in human historic narratives.
Worster reasons along the lines of Thoreau, Muir, and Leopold. In his thinking, nature has an inherent transcendent value of its own. In the central essays of the book Worster focuses on land use and American attitudes - in particular agricultural. He also examines the essential part water played in the west and what he refers to as the story of the "myth of irrigating" (p.120). He returns repeatedly to the theme of Leopold's ecological consciousness and "land ethic" as a new way of treating the land ... and planet.
In a concluding chapter dedicated to the subject of sustainability, Worster is very cynical. His criticizes sustainability as: being at its foundation based on production and consumption (p. 143), a continuation of the Progressive era philosophy of "sustained-yield" theory in forest management, and as a state driven solution to the anarchy of laissez-faire capitalism. Worster (a Marxist)questions the utopianism of the concept of sustainability by trying to place it in a timeframe. Worster asks, "If we cannot expect to achieve a perfect sustainability that lasts forever, what then can we hope for and work toward"(p.146)? He finds "deep flaws in the sustainability development ideal ... [it] rests on uncritical, unexamined acceptance of the traditional world-view of progressive, secular materialism" (pp. 153-154). He argues that the institutions associated with the sustainability ideal world-view "including those of capitalism, socialism, and industrialism, also escape all criticism." (p. 154)
Instead, he pushes for a "careful and strict preservation of the billion-year-old heritage" achieved by the evolution of plant and animal life. He addresses the "materialist revolution," which he argues threatens the survival of the planet. Worster quotes historian Lynn White in positing that the roots of materialism, date back to the founding of Christianity. He quotes White, "By destroying pagan animism ... Christianity made it possible to exploit nature in a mood of indifference" (p. 207). Worster criticizes a number of aspects of what he terms the "materialist revolution," arguing that the materialist movement was motivated by economics, manifested itself as a secular force, was ration in its internal logic, and was perceived as progressive and modern. He concludes by examining the life and philosophies of Adam Smith and Karl Marx, and joining both together as being of the materialist bent, both being indifferent to the ecological fate of the planet(pp. 215-218).
This is a sound book for understanding the origins and evolution of the history and philosophy of modern environmentalism.

