| This item cannot be shipped to your selected delivery location. Please choose a different delivery location. |
Other Sellers on Amazon
92% positive over last 12 months
94% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment First Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
Purchase options and add-ons
For the past quarter-century, government and the private sector have relied heavily on risk assessment for making decisions, allowing widespread environmental deterioration. In this book, Mary O'Brien recommends a simple yet profound shift to another decision-making technique: alternatives assessment. Instead of asking how much of a hazardous activity is safe (which translates into how much damage the environment can tolerate), alternatives assessment asks how we can avoid or minimize damage while achieving society's goals. Alternatives assessment is a simple, commonsense alternative to risk assessment. It is based on the premise that it is not acceptable to damage human and nonhuman health or the environment if there are reasonable alternatives. The approach calls for taking precautionary measures even if some cause-and-effect relationships have not been fully established scientifically. The process must involve an examination of the full range of alternatives, including no action at all. Equally important, it must be democratic and include potentially affected parties. O'Brien not only makes a persuasive case for alternative assessment; she tells how to implement it. She also shows how this technique has profound implications for public health, for our stewardship of the environment, and for a truly democratic government. Published in association with the Environmental Research Foundation.
- ISBN-100262650533
- ISBN-13978-0262650533
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherMIT Press
- Publication dateMay 15, 2000
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 0.77 x 8.94 inches
- Print length352 pages
Editorial Reviews
Review
& quot; Risk assessments are a recipe for the continued degradation of our environment. People who want to leave a healthier planet for our children will find Dr. O'Brien's book an invaluable resource, a ray of hope, and a call to action.& quot; -- Bern Johnson, Executive Director, U. S. Office, Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (E-LAW)
" Risk assessments are a recipe for the continued degradation of our environment. People who want to leave a healthier planet for our children will find Dr. O'Brien's book an invaluable resource, a ray of hope, and a call to action." -- Bern Johnson, Executive Director, U. S. Office, Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (E-LAW)
-- Bern Johnson, Executive Director, U. S. Office, Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide (E-LAW)
Review
Risk assessments are a recipe for the continued degradation of ourenvironment. People who want to leave a healthier planet for our childrenwill find Dr. O'Brien's book an invaluable resource, a ray of hope, and acall to action.
―Bern Johnson, Executive Director, U. S. Office, Environmental LawAlliance Worldwide (E-LAW)This book reads like an extended conversation with a knowledgeable scientist. The thinking is highly original and the scholarship is deep and original.
―Richard Clapp, Boston University School of Public HealthScientifically and ethically irrefutable. Mary O'Brien pulls back the curtain of wizardry that surrounds risk assessment and shows us the tembling little men behind it. Even better, she offers us a way out of our current hazard-filled existence. Speak plainly, O'Brien urges us, and, chapter after chapter, she does.
―Sandra Steingraber, author of Living Downstream: An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the EnvironmentFresh clean air blows through Mary O'Brien's book, and takes 'risk assessment' away with it. O'Brien argues persuasively risk assessments cannont be improved because they are defective to the marrow. Her alternative is provocative and will win many new adherents. A landmakr book.
―David Ozonoff, Professor of Environmental Health and Chair, Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public HealthMary O'Brien has produced a compelling treatise on why and how we must shift our attention from assessing problems to devising solutions to environmental, health, and safety threats. Commonsense technology options analysis―or alternatives assessment―transcends value-laden and limited classical risk assessment and is essential for achieving sustainable industrial transformations.
―Nicholas Ashford, Professor of Technology and Policy, MIT, and co-author, Chemical Exposures: Low Levels and High StakesAbout the Author
Product details
- Publisher : MIT Press; First Edition (May 15, 2000)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 352 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0262650533
- ISBN-13 : 978-0262650533
- Item Weight : 14.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.77 x 8.94 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #835,258 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #56 in Environmental Engineering (Books)
- #175 in Environmental Studies
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
If you've ever been involved in a campaign against against a polluting industry, as I have, you'll recognise the following tactics used by them: Downplay estimates of hazard: Discount harmful effects experienced and reported by local communities as 'anecdotal'. Downplay estimates of exposure: Use complicated mathematical models or formulas that can only be analysed in a complicated computer program, that community groups cannot easily gain access to or understand. Downplay risks: Compare the risks to other 'voluntary' activities like smoking. Do not discuss whether the risks are necessary or whether they could be avoided entirely through reasonable alternative behaviours.
It is on this common sense latter point that the book really concentrates. Mary O'Brien gives the example of a woman standing besides an icy river that she needs to cross. Four 'experts' are advising her. The toxicologist tells her the water is probably free of chemicals; the cardiologist says she is at little risk as her heart is sound; the hydrologist states that the currents are probably safe; and the EPA specialist tells her she will probably survive the crossing as it is a low risk compared to many other environmental problems. They are amazed when she continues to refuse to wade the river. Until, of course, she points to the bridge a few yards away which they all had conveniently ignored or failed to notice!
O'Brien also emphasises the public right to know; after all, it is those living in a community who will suffer the impact of pollution. If we could actually name those individuals who will die from the effects of pollution, we could accuse agencies and businesses of premeditated murder. But why is it any different when they talk of a 0.1% increase in the likely number of premature deaths resulting from a process? Even though we can't name the people who will die, death is still death. And the polluting process still killed them.
O'Brien calls for all government agencies and businesses to put their options in understandable language, and to consider ways of creating the least possible environmental damage. She argues that all citizens should be given easy access to relevant information, especially on health effects, and that we should have access to legal and financial resources to enforce environmental laws.
For those campaigning on these issues, take a really close look at Chapter 16, 'Getting Started'. Here O'Brien gives step-by-step advice on how 'Alternatives Assessment' could be carried out, forcing regulators and industries to evaluate the real impact of their actions and forcing them to find the environmentally best options, not a statistical justification for the harm they are already doing.
For campaigners, don't get swallowed up in the 'Risk Assessment' game. At the end, however much scientific expertise and statistical skill you acquire, you will probably be defeated. And in the process, you are helping to justify a fundamentally flawed approach. Instead, ask the basic questions, and try to get the local politicians, regulators and bureaucrats to take on board the real issues of 'should we be doing this at all' and 'what could we do instead'.
Certainly the most helpful, and practical book of this kind that I have read in ten years of environmental campaigning.
Adrian Fox Chair of Environmental Working Group, West Wiltshire District Council, United Kingdom