Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
I'm only sorry that the most recent edition, the 11th, is not available used at a low cost. This is not a well-known book; apparently only published as a textbook for certain history or strategic studies programs.
That's a shame. I wish this book was required reading in every high school and for any public office, from President to dogcatcher.
Forget the usual gas about "economic rivalries" or "secret treaties" or "nobody wants a war." This book documents, clearly, bluntly and convincingly, how in all the major conflicts from 1900 on, the shooting got started as a result of a chain of stupid mistakes; how leaders on both sides misperceived each other's intentions, how how actions intended to be restrained instead provoked worse response on the other side, how those who started the shooting had no idea how big and extensive the conflict would be. Every time.
If we don't have more leaders, and the people they are responsible, more cool headed without being complacent, really taking the trouble to understand their possible adversaries instead of being guided by wishful or fearful thinking--usually both--our risk of more wars, and more wars spiraling out of control, approaches certainty.
I bought this as a present for a friend just starting college as a history major, reasonably sure that he would not be exposed to in in school!
I was originally required to read this book for a class, but found it interesting anyway :).
In any case, I have always been interested in history, and almost majored in it in college, and so found this book particularly interesting. His concept is so simple, and yet so often overlooked. As I understand it, his basic point is that people often think of wars as being caused by factors such as religious differences, economics, etc. Stoessinger argues that these types of factors are necessary but not sufficient. You also need additional factors, particularly misperceptions.
I think that he makes a pretty decent case for this, his examples are appropriately chosen, and he makes some very interesting observations. I think many of his ideas have very great explaining power and should be a consideration in any discussion of war.
Definitly a recommended read, particularly if you're interested in history or political science.
Much cheaper 10th ed is sufficient to understand the author's main thesis: that major wars for the last 100 years have largely been initiated by vain political leaders who grossly misestimate the power differential with their rivals.
"This book covers the specific conflicts contained in it very well. It tells the stories in an engaging way, putting in interesting details but still showing the big picture. The only thing that cost it a star was that the author's opinion is very prevalent throughout--it's not a balanced look at the conflicts like some other books are. I used this book and 2 others to pass the "World Conflicts Since 1900" Excelsior College Exam with a grade of "A.""
Yes, you get the professor's opinions about what he believe actually happened in great historical events, but I found the book to be very insightful and interesting. It went beyond the facts of the biggest events in history and looked at the people behind those events.
My class needed the 11th edition of this book that costs about a hundred dollars new at my university book store. I thought the price of the book was outrageous for a book that was more of a history interpretation than a political science textbook. I got this 10th edition and I saved a lot of money. It came to my house just in time before we started reading it.