From 1990 through to 2000 Sadako Ogata was the head of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). Before that Ogata held a professorship in International Politics in Japan. The reason I mention the latter point is, to be honest, coming into the subject with a significant academic pedigree (Ogata, not me - mine is less impressive) I was hoping for a more substantial analysis of the UNHCR as a political institution as the UNHCR substantially changed during Ogata's term.
It would have been helpful for a more nuanced history of the organisation. Formed in 1950 the UNHCR is, with the exception of Palestinian refugees (which comes under the remit of the UNRWA), responsible for managing the international cooperation on UN member states and plays a key role in monitoring refugee movements and providing initial humanitarian relief. The UNHCR, together with the 1951 Refugee Convention itself, began life dealing overwhelmingly with European refugees, most notably the Jewish displaced after WWII. Thereafter the Cold War ensured that refugees were predominately European and (in the case of the US), South American. However, in the 1990s there were a number of changes. The end of the Cold War put an end to the often overtly political recognition of refugees from the eastern bloc and the UNHCR focused its attention on the developing world to a far greater extent.
In this book Ogata basically offers an extended survey of the UNHCR operations within the key refugee causing crises of the 1990s, namely the first Gulf War, Afghanistan, the Balkan Crisis and the Great Lakes region. As a memoir this is at times an interesting account but I must say as a professor of international politics i was really hoping for a lot more from Ogata. For example, much is made of the reasons why in the First Gulf war the UNHCR made the very significant move from managing refugee flows (which, by definition, requires the extra-territoriality of the refugee) to creating camps of Internally Displaced Persons. Not only is this an extension of UNHCR's traditional mandate but it represented a positive collaboration of UNHCR operations with alien (that is non-iraqi) military forces - this is a theme that Ogata reiterates as a key part of her approach in various fields of operation; yet there is very little critical comment on this highly significant trend of making the military a pivotal agent of humanitarian relief.
This could have been an excellent book; her position, together with expertise at a time of immense change in humanitarian operations over the decade in question should have made this a significant text - as it is, however, it's more suitable as a coffee table book for the more discerning reader. One to avoid.

