Buy new:
$15.35$15.35
Arrives:
Oct 23 - 30
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: pearlbook
Buy used: $8.17
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $10.91 shipping
87% positive over lifetime
+ $10.91 shipping
85% positive over lifetime
+ $10.91 shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal Hardcover – September 17, 2019
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$5.95
| $7.95 with discounted Audible membership | |
|
Audio CD, Audiobook, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $22.74 | $8.69 |
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Purchase options and add-ons
For more than twenty years, Naomi Klein has been the foremost chronicler of the economic war waged on both people and planet—and an unapologetic champion of a sweeping environmental agenda with justice at its center. In lucid, elegant dispatches from the frontlines of contemporary natural disaster, she pens surging, indispensable essays for a wide public: prescient advisories and dire warnings of what future awaits us if we refuse to act, as well as hopeful glimpses of a far better future. On Fire: The (Burning) Case for a Green New Deal gathers for the first time more than a decade of her impassioned writing, and pairs it with new material on the staggeringly high stakes of our immediate political and economic choices.
These long-form essays show Klein at her most prophetic and philosophical, investigating the climate crisis not only as a profound political challenge but as a spiritual and imaginative one, as well. Delving into topics ranging from the clash between ecological time and our culture of “perpetual now,” to the soaring history of humans changing and evolving rapidly in the face of grave threats, to rising white supremacy and fortressed borders as a form of “climate barbarism,” this is a rousing call to action for a planet on the brink.
With reports spanning from the ghostly Great Barrier Reef, to the annual smoke-choked skies of the Pacific Northwest, to post-hurricane Puerto Rico, to a Vatican attempting an unprecedented “ecological conversion,” Klein makes the case that we will rise to the existential challenge of climate change only if we are willing to transform the systems that produced this crisis.
An expansive, far-ranging exploration that sees the battle for a greener world as indistinguishable from the fight for our lives, On Fire captures the burning urgency of the climate crisis, as well as the fiery energy of a rising political movement demanding a catalytic Green New Deal.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSimon & Schuster
- Publication dateSeptember 17, 2019
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.1 x 8.38 inches
- ISBN-101982129913
- ISBN-13978-1982129910
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The ClimatePaperback$11.48 shippingGet it as soon as Wednesday, Oct 25Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
Submit a report
- Harassment, profanity
- Spam, advertisement, promotions
- Given in exchange for cash, discounts
Sorry, there was an error
Please try again later.-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
This book is poorly written. It seems to be cobbled together from speeches given by the author in various venues. It is filled with bold statements that appear to be oversimplifications, are often vague and sometimes false.
I was disappointed that there is very little discussion of the science behind climate change. Instead “On Fire” is a political manifesto arguing action without giving clear reasons for the action.
Climate change is indeed the most urgent crisis confronting the world. Scientists now realize that global temperatures will rise by 3 to 5 degrees C over preindustrial levels by 2100. That will cause sea levels to rise, destroying some coastal cities (eg Miami), and may make parts of the tropics uninhabitable in summer months. Since excess carbon can stay in the atmosphere for several hundred years, warming temperatures may eventually lead to the extinction of humans.
Naomi Klein is correct that the extent of the warming and the suffering that ensues are dependent on the actions we take now. But what should those actions be?
The idea of the environment limiting the growth of populations is not new. An excellent book of 1972, Limits to Growth, by Randers et al, argued that population growth even as low as 1% or 2% per year would come to an end when the earth reached its carrying capacity. The argument was based on the mathematics of exponential growth as taught in university calculus, and models of dynamical systems. This argument seemed quite robust. The authors provided several scenarios describing what might happen if food, or oil were the limiting constraint, or if it was destruction of the environment that brought an end to population growth.
The book was written before global warming was understood. We now know that it is the environment through global warming that will be the limiting factor. The book Limits to Growth described “overshoot and collapse” as a characteristic of many of the models. That means that population temporarily exceeds carrying capacity because some effects of population growth occur after a delay. Overshoot and collapse will likely occur with a vengeance as global warming brings an end to population growth, as regions near the equator become uninhabitable decreasing the carrying capacity of earth.
We have two choices: We can use birth control to limit population ourselves. This would ameliorate climate change to some extent, and would surely limit suffering in places like Africa which is expected to double its current population by 2050. The other possibility is to watch death rates rise until the population overshoots the new carrying capacity of earth, and then falls back to the new lower level. The second alternative may bring in its wake a new Dark Ages, and wars over resources.
Klein does not share my view that population growth is the primary cause of climate change. Her description of the causes is found on page 99 of the book: “The biggest big green groups have avoided … any serious debate on the blindingly obvious roots of the climate crisis: globalization, deregulation, and contemporary capitalism’s quest for perpetual growth.”
Klein does not make a convincing argument that globalization is one of the culprits. Maybe deregulation is a factor, but Klein’s argument for this is also weak.
On the other hand, it is true that growth must eventually come to an end, particularly population growth. But it is not capitalism that causes global warming, but rather the need for ever-increasing consumption of energy to meet the needs of a growing population.
If we don’t limit population growth ourselves, we will enter the collapse phase of overshoot and collapse, population will fall, and economic growth will be replaced by contraction.
In addition to blaming capitalism, Klein demonizes free trade, because it uses too much carbon to transport goods, and argues for “relocalizing” production, which means (among other things) going from large industrial farms to small family farms and gardens.
But as the world’s population has increased, cities have become necessary for much of humanity, and residents are dependent on trucks which use oil (hopefully to be replaced by electricity) to bring in food. Klein’s argument to reverse this trend would be appealing if we could all live on our own farms in the country, but that is only possible for a small elite.
She is defying experts from other fields when she argues against free trade. Most economists believe that both countries benefit when they engage in trade, each economy producing the goods which they can make most efficiently.
When you destroy efficiency, living standards go down. Klein seems to accept lower living standards, suggesting that people should be happy to consume less and be satisfied with less “stuff.” But I was left wondering how this would affect the growing number of homeless in the US, already living on the brink.
On page 199, Klein writes “we must … carefully wind down existing fossil fuel projects, at the same time as we rapidly ramp up renewables until we get global emissions down to zero globally by mid-century.” But she gives no convincing explanation of how to achieve that. With current technology, coal is cheaper than solar panels, and poorer countries with trouble feeding their poor can't take on the added expense.
Klein wants to solve the problem of redistributing the world’s assets from rich to poor at the same time as we find ways of lessening carbon emission. On pages 240-241 she writes, “we need to up our ambition and show exactly how battling climate change is a once in a century chance to build a more democratic economy.” Instead of focusing just on climate change, much of the book argues for social justice, and the Green New Deal includes not just actions on climate change but a host of other liberal issues.
For example, universal health care is included in the Green New Deal. But to make this possible we must recognize the limits to our resources, and in particular we would need to train new doctors to provide the additional health care. This is one aspect of universal health care that has not been adequately discussed in the media.
The problem is that illegal immigration could overwhelm attempts to extend health care to millions of uninsured. The population of Guatemala has quadrupled since 1960, and increased population in Guatemala and other Latin American countries could make universal health care unaffordable in the long run, even with heavy taxes on the wealthy. Better than continued illegal immigration would be economic aid for Latin American countries along with family planning that helps those who choose to limit family size.
China took the lessons of Limits to Growth to heart in 1979 when it introduced its one child policy. India has had no such policy, and comparison of the results is stark. China is now vying with the US for leadership of the world economy, while poverty within India is still oppressive. The video Klein cites with Ocasio-Cortez dreams of bullet trains in the video of a better America she envisions seven years in the future. China already has 18,000 miles of such high speed rail connecting major cities, contributing to a greener future for China, and possibly enabling China to extend high speed rail technology to much of the rest of the world, while India’s trains are still slow and inefficient.
If a Democratic president tried to implement the approach outlined in this book to halt climate change, along with providing universal health care without also achieving zero population growth to limit growth in expenses, there is a real danger that resource constraints would make the changes impossible to achieve. The consequence might be the election of a Trump clone in 2024. Democrats need to get the climate change issue right.
Potential readers of this book should look to other sources for both the science on climate change and realistic policies for addressing it.
Like Rachel Carson and 'Silent Spring', Klein will be remembered for explaining the attitudes, inactions and complacency that will shape our environment over the next century. Her book is a concise gem. Likewise, we can thank Trudeau for helping make it happen. Had her warnings been heeded over the past four years, he'd now be bouncing about boasting, "We're No. 1! We're No.!" - - instead of worrying about being "bounced" in his re-election bid.
Let's start with Trudeau who, in 2017, told a cheering crowd of oil executives in Houston, "No country would find 173 billion barrels of oil in the ground and just leave it there." (If Trudeau loses his re-election bid, his outlook will seem benign compared to the likely fate of the Alberta tar sands in the hands of Conservative cretins.)
Klein succinctly outlines the impact of such decisions.
(However, on a personal basis, I think humans are a "super virus" that is ravaging our planet. But, I'm also an optimist. After a few billion deaths, the planet and enough humans will survive in a new mutual understanding of Mama Nature. Am I right? Well, consider the May 6 Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services report, based on 15,000 research papers. It predicts the extinction of a million species of animals, insects and plants by the end of the century. In other words, at the present of pollution and exploitation, almost everything but 'Indifference' is threatened.)
It's time to listen.
What is possible? Well, consider the impact of the 'Silent Spring' by Rachel Carson, the early disaster warning in 1962 that is becoming the reality cited by Klein. People always ignore the impact of pending disaster; it's why there have been 10,000 "civilizations" in the last 5,000 years and none have survived its forecast of demise. Carson's working title for the manuscript? 'Man Against the Earth'.
Instead of Klein's "Green" response, it's likely people will use the tradition approach - - engineering. It will be called 'geo engineering', and if it's very expensive, 'Brilliant Engineering'. It may shield the planet with a near-space blanket of chemicals (or dust) as an umbrella to block sunlight. Brilliant engineering created our modern world, but its dark side is always the "unknown unknowns." Unk! Unk!!
Just how does "life" deal with a "virus" such as humanity? If the past offers any guidance - - the first response will be a 'DDT' quickfix solution. It's nice to invent the future; it's something else to make it work. On that note: Where are the flying cars we were promised in 1945? We don't even have 'smart' cars yet.
Granted, she's optimistic. It's the saving grace of her book, and a reason for all to trust in "just a bit of global disaster, nothing too serious." In engineering we trust, all else is rust, dust and bust. Remember the old saying from the 1930's Dust Bowl devastation? "In God We Trusted, In Kansas We Busted."
Let's do it again?
Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2020
Top reviews from other countries
Her praise of Germany's energy transition policy shows a blatant disregard for facts. Germany committed to shutting down nuclear following Fukushima (again this fits with her ideological opposition to nuclear), and 'localism' (which she favours) has put meant no onshore wind is currently being built because the NIMBYs do not want it. Germany has contributed nothing to decarbonisation since 2010. She glosses over the slow pace of coal shutdowns in Germany as if it's a minor footnote with only passing relevance to her main point. It is not. Further, the reason coal is being shutdown slowly is to support employment in the coal sectors, and to manage the socio-economic implications of the transition for real people. In her world, this conflict simply does not exist.
Compare Germany with the UK strategy, which barely gets a mention. This is largely private sector and markets based (with highly successful auction based subsidy regime for renewables), and with legally enshrined decarbonisation targets. UK (and other European) offshore wind subsidies have largely paid for development of the technology, now being developed globally. Again, the innovation is being delivered by large, profit-seeking corporations. The government is providing market structure but it is not delivering the investment or the change.
I guess the biggest question for me is what political structure she is actually advocating. What if there is no democratic mandate for the kind of change she thinks is required?
Naomi Klein is now focused on wider issues associated with the climate change emergency and, in this book, she echoes the voice of Greta Thunberg (who was not even born when No Logo came out), to appeal for us all to act as if this was an emergency. Klien calls for a Green New Deal similar to FD Roosevelt's New Deal in the 1930's that turned the United States from the depths of economic depression to a global superpower in less than a generation. The book consists of a series of essays that Klein has written between 2016 and 2019 in response to the current issues and, in particular, the obvious candidates who are the non believers who continue to plough on with destructive fossil fuels.
The case for a Green New Deal is compelling and this book is as relevant as anything written on the subject of the climate emergency. If this book is as successful as No Logo in changing both public perception and that of those in power then there might just be a chance. We live in hope.
All'inizio ero scettico e dubitavo che Naomi Klein potesse aggiungere qualcosa di rilevante su un argomento del quale ho letto in abbondanza, invece mi sono ricreduto.
L'approccio al tema è coraggioso e netto perché scarta ogni soluzione fatta di piccoli passi e di compromessi, ritenendola inefficace dopo 40 anni persi, e soprattutto dichiara che l'unica possibilità è affrontare di petto la causa principale: la politica economica ultra liberale.
A partire dagli anni '80 il sistema economico ha imboccato la strada di un liberismo senza freni e controlli che produce sfruttamento scriteriato delle risorse naturali e altre gravi conseguenze, come la crescente diseguaglianza di ricchezza, di reddito, di lavoro, e di opportunità in generale per una porzione crescente della popolazione mondiale.
Quindi per la giornalista canadese la soluzione è un eco-socialismo democratico che risolva la questione alla radice, affrontando la crisi climatica e contemporaneamente le altre crisi collegate.
Chiarezza e grande onestà intellettuale, purtroppo la conferma che avrei dovuto all'epoca leggere anche No Logo.










