Amazon.com: Customer reviews: The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth
Skip to main content
.us
Hello Select your address
All
Select the department you want to search in
Hello, Sign in
Account & Lists
Returns & Orders
Cart
All
Find a Gift Best Sellers Amazon Basics Epic Daily Deals Customer Service Prime New Releases Books Registry Toys & Games Fashion Kindle Books Gift Cards Pharmacy Amazon Home Shopper Toolkit Sell Automotive Video Games Computers Home Improvement Coupons Beauty & Personal Care Smart Home Health & Household TV & Video Pet Supplies Handmade Baby Home Audio & Theater Disability Customer Support
Epic deals on your fave brands

  • The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth
  • ›
  • Customer reviews

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
409 global ratings
5 star
71%
4 star
19%
3 star
7%
2 star
2%
1 star
1%
The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth

The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth

byJonathan Rauch
Write a review
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
See All Buying Options

Add to Wish List

Top positive review

All positive reviews›
M. JEFFREY MCMAHON
TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICE
5.0 out of 5 starsEpistemic Crisis Defined
Reviewed in the United States on June 22, 2021
Clearly and masterfully written, Jonathan Rauch’s The Constitution of Knowledge is about the breakdown of truth-seeking norms in a world of polarization. We no longer turn to experts, peer-reviewed sources, and credible media to mediate our news. Our crisis is that different factions don’t want truth found through morality or humility or reality-seeking norms; they want to win and beat their opponents. Finding knowledge is about seeking truth. Our political battle and polarization are about winning.

This polarization exists on the Right and Left and both exist and are strengthened by each other in a symbiotic relationship. As Rauch writes:

“One is predominantly right-wing and populist, the other predominantly left-wing and elitist. One employs chaos and confusion, the other conformity and social coercion. But their goals are similar and often, weirdly, they act as de facto allies.”

Both contribute to the demise of liberal democracy. As Rauch observes: “What troll culture and cancel culture have in common is that they are techniques of what propaganda experts often call information warfare. Rather than using traditional persuasion to seek truth, they manipulate the social and media environments for political advantage.”

This is a great book, but I don’t see political tribalists with an agenda reading this book, so sadly Rauch will be preaching to the choir: thoughtful intellectuals, independent thinkers, moral, decent human beings. Sadly, such people need to be in bigger numbers. Otherwise, the “epistemic crisis” that Rauch explores will only get worse.

One important point. You will find people steeped in the fever swamp of misinformation rebuking Rauch's book by using Russian talking points and thereby supporting Rauch's argument, but of course we can find little consolation in this as we are horrified by watching our democracy disintegrate before our eyes.
Read more
117 people found this helpful

Top critical review

All critical reviews›
Anne Winkler
3.0 out of 5 starsPhysician, Heal Thyself
Reviewed in the United States on June 22, 2021
Rauch may see clearly the attack on knowledge and the pursuit of truth, but he is blind to his own crippling biases.

He cannot make it more than a thought or two without descending into a diatribe about Donald Trump--while ignoring the undisputed facts that have come to light about the illegal activities of the FBI and the collusion of the other intelligence agencies, the media, and the Democratic Party in perpetuating the true Big Lie-that there ever was any reason to believe the Russian Collusion hoax. The fact that he cannot admit that traditional journalists were guilty in perpetuating this lie--eager to do so, in fact--renders his judgement of Trump and the Right suspect.

Rauch also ignores the inconvenient facts emerging about the problems with the election in Fulton County and Maricopa County, insists on calling some on the Right seditious and treasonous, and generally portrays himself and other traditional journalists as honest purveyors of fact. What a joke.
Read more
137 people found this helpful

Search
Sort by
Top reviews
Filter by
All reviewers
All stars
Text, image, video
409 global ratings | 72 global reviews

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

From the United States

M. JEFFREY MCMAHON
TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICE
5.0 out of 5 stars Epistemic Crisis Defined
Reviewed in the United States on June 22, 2021
Verified Purchase
Clearly and masterfully written, Jonathan Rauch’s The Constitution of Knowledge is about the breakdown of truth-seeking norms in a world of polarization. We no longer turn to experts, peer-reviewed sources, and credible media to mediate our news. Our crisis is that different factions don’t want truth found through morality or humility or reality-seeking norms; they want to win and beat their opponents. Finding knowledge is about seeking truth. Our political battle and polarization are about winning.

This polarization exists on the Right and Left and both exist and are strengthened by each other in a symbiotic relationship. As Rauch writes:

“One is predominantly right-wing and populist, the other predominantly left-wing and elitist. One employs chaos and confusion, the other conformity and social coercion. But their goals are similar and often, weirdly, they act as de facto allies.”

Both contribute to the demise of liberal democracy. As Rauch observes: “What troll culture and cancel culture have in common is that they are techniques of what propaganda experts often call information warfare. Rather than using traditional persuasion to seek truth, they manipulate the social and media environments for political advantage.”

This is a great book, but I don’t see political tribalists with an agenda reading this book, so sadly Rauch will be preaching to the choir: thoughtful intellectuals, independent thinkers, moral, decent human beings. Sadly, such people need to be in bigger numbers. Otherwise, the “epistemic crisis” that Rauch explores will only get worse.

One important point. You will find people steeped in the fever swamp of misinformation rebuking Rauch's book by using Russian talking points and thereby supporting Rauch's argument, but of course we can find little consolation in this as we are horrified by watching our democracy disintegrate before our eyes.
117 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Anne Winkler
3.0 out of 5 stars Physician, Heal Thyself
Reviewed in the United States on June 22, 2021
Rauch may see clearly the attack on knowledge and the pursuit of truth, but he is blind to his own crippling biases.

He cannot make it more than a thought or two without descending into a diatribe about Donald Trump--while ignoring the undisputed facts that have come to light about the illegal activities of the FBI and the collusion of the other intelligence agencies, the media, and the Democratic Party in perpetuating the true Big Lie-that there ever was any reason to believe the Russian Collusion hoax. The fact that he cannot admit that traditional journalists were guilty in perpetuating this lie--eager to do so, in fact--renders his judgement of Trump and the Right suspect.

Rauch also ignores the inconvenient facts emerging about the problems with the election in Fulton County and Maricopa County, insists on calling some on the Right seditious and treasonous, and generally portrays himself and other traditional journalists as honest purveyors of fact. What a joke.
137 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


James Strock
VINE VOICE
5.0 out of 5 stars Timely, Important, Provocative, Readable
Reviewed in the United States on June 23, 2021
Vine Customer Review of Free Product( What's this? )
I've admired the writing of Jonathan Rauch for quite some time. His latest may be his best.

Amid a perfect storm of technological change, political turbulence and cultural turmoil, our systems of communication have become disordered. Rauch convincingly argues that largely Leftist 'cancel culture' and largely Rightist disinformation campaigns are highly calculated attacks on longstanding norms of information dissemination and opinion formulation. These phenomena have resulted in a breakdown of norms of communication, persuasion, and politics.

Rauch cites historical precedents to make his case, along with contemporary analyses.

Perhaps the most important takeaway is that relying on a 'free market' of ideas to sort things out may not be possible in our current moment. What is unclear is how this can be resolved. Rauch appears to be optimistic that there is a reservoir of good faith and trust that can be summoned as the challenges become more widely understood.

American books tend to end with summary chapters that purport to present workable solutions to the problems identified. Rauch concludes with several sections encouraging a more sophisticated consumption of information and a bottom-up response. Readers may find the problem-identification the more persuasive element. Once citizens develop something like a herd immunity to the manipulation, the social media tools that sometimes vex us may present new opportunities for mobilization, to update and strengthen the norms and institutions our democratic republic relies upon to govern ourselves, as well as to harness otherwise disparate information such as has served the world in all manner of technological breakthroughs.

Highly recommended.
69 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Dr. Warren Coats
5.0 out of 5 stars A compelling guild to finding the truth
Reviewed in the United States on July 2, 2021
Verified Purchase
Trust is a critically important feature of successful relationships and of flourishing societies. Enduring trust builds on honestly and truth. Jonathan Rauch explores these truths in The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth. His enlightening exploration of how to find and defend truth in today’s challenging environment is both an entertaining and an educational read.

In sorting out fact from fiction we must recognize the personal and social biases through which we evaluate claims and the factors that motivate them. The task is made even more difficult by the fact that there are some who deliberately propagate falsehoods for their own purposes. But “reality-based communities” have developed norms and institutions for challenging and testing “truth.” Free speech and a free press are an indispensable element of such institutions.
As Rauch insightfully explains, it requires our individual commitment to truth and the institutions and norms that facilitate and incentivize finding it (filtering falsehood from truth). It requires an effective Constitution of Knowledge.
28 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Amazon Customer
5.0 out of 5 stars Is the fever starting to break?
Reviewed in the United States on July 3, 2021
Verified Purchase
As a conservative I have long been concerned about the illiberalality of many to my political left. But this book gives me hope: here’s at least one honest thinker on the left who is willing to stand up and call out people with whom he might agree politically for their regressive, reactionary epistemologies.

And guess what? We might have a couple of Mr. Rauch’s named bad actors, Fox News and Donald Trump, to thank for it.

The Geneva Accords on the conduct of warfare are self-enforcing. Nations and armies at war respect them—not because there’s some divine agency monitoring their conduct—but because all sides in a conflict are prepared to conduct reprisals against violators. Hitler didn’t avoid using poison gas against the Western Allies out of the goodness of his heart (six million gassed Jews are unavailable for comment); he didn’t use poison gas because the Americans and British had stockpiles of poison gas and delivery systems in theatre ready to go if the German military crossed that line.

For each of Mr. Rauch’s examples of Donald Trump’s casual respect for truth, I can counter with an example of a Democrat politician’s lies. (E.g., Hillary Clinton’s claim that the attack on our consulate in Benghazi was caused by a YouTube video.) For each of his examples of Fox News reporting sensationalized but not-well-fact-checked stories that pander to those of us on the right, I can counter with an example of a “mainstream” outlet pushing a story that panders to my friends on the left. (Recall that “fake but accurate” was how the New York Times described the forged memos claiming George W. Bush tried to avoid Vietnam service.) And for each example of Donald Trump using the Federal bureaucracy against his political opponents, I can counter with examples from his predecessor’s presidency. (Anyone recall Lois Lerner trying to explain why the IRS was denying and slow-walking tax exempt status for Tea Party organizations?)

So Mr. Rauch, welcome to my world. I regret that my side of the political aisle has been forced to implement the information warfare equivalent of Geneva Convention physical warfare reprisals to motivate leftist thinkers like you to call for a return to the principles and practices of the Constitution of Knowledge. Frankly, I voted for Donald Trump not because I thought he was a good man, but “because he fights”.

But even as late as you are to the party, again I say “welcome” and “well stated”. You have convinced me to shift my personal charitable donations from a Wikipedia competitor to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.

I hope your book signals the beginning of the breaking of the delirium fever of self-righteous closed epistemology that I’ve seen on the left for too many decades.

But I can’t resist asking two questions: (1) Since publication more facts have come out tending to confirm the hypothesis that COVID-19 was developed in a laboratory; want to revisit your casual dismissal of that as a conspiracy theory? And (2) perhaps in your next edition you might examine the phenomenon of scientists and policy makers falling back on statements like “the science is settled” and “a consensus of scientists exists” on the severity of the ‘existential’ threat of anthropogenic global warming and the necessity of drastic government interference with economic freedom?
25 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Bill Chapman
3.0 out of 5 stars Interesting, But Incomplete
Reviewed in the United States on August 22, 2021
Verified Purchase
I just finished this book this week.

First, Rauch describes the ways in which Trump and Putin bombard their audience with frequently conflicting information, disorienting them. But there is no description whatsoever of the legitimate grievances that whites without a college education had against the bicoastal college-educated intellectual elite, who had been indifferent to their interests, that led the Trump voters to reject the leadership of the mainstream media, Hollywood, and the universities.

Then he goes into cancel culture and how destructive it is, without mentioning that the social justice left has erected speech rules that prevent a lot of relevant truths from being expressed, with severe punishments for anyone who violates those rules.

Then he makes arguments against cancel culture, trying to persuade people not to participate in social media pile-ons, using his experience of decades of being a pro-gay advocate to illustrate his point.

While he has some ideas for solving the epistemic crisis on the political left, he really has none whatsoever for anyone who wants to lead the political right toward being in better touch with reality.
16 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Executive Mom
5.0 out of 5 stars In-depth, insightful must read
Reviewed in the United States on June 30, 2021
Verified Purchase
I don't normally read books like this but I was intrigued by the subject and how we got to where we are today with "truthiness". I found the book to be extremely well researched and fact based, with both a lot of historical background information and a lot of relevant current context. Well worth reading. Conclusion: must buy.
9 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Douglas Griffith
3.0 out of 5 stars Does not persuade
Reviewed in the United States on July 12, 2021
Verified Purchase
The scholarship is excellent. There is much useful information. But it does not persuade. Consequently, I was left in the depths of depression.
11 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


B&W
2.0 out of 5 stars Good book in theory
Reviewed in the United States on August 31, 2021
Verified Purchase
I like a lot of what this author has to say in his book. Sadly he and his book wind up being the victim one sad reality and one extremely important and yet overlooked fact.

1. The people who most desperately need to read this book will never read it, and it therefore mostly amounts to preaching to the converted.

2. The book never acknowledges or addresses false equivalencies and the dangers therein. Like a true 20th century journalist the author suggests that we use the “Constitution of Knowledge” to level a playing field that in reality is anything but. When 1/3 of America is living in a delusional alternative reality and flirting with fascism, we do not stand to gain from validating this as somehow worthy of being elevated to the same status as legitimate, truth based reality. There are not 2 legitimate viewpoints when it comes to racism, sexism, homophobia, fascism, etc., but the author would have you believe that there are!

In openly and implicitly inviting and entertaining false equivalencies the writer reveals his Achilles Heel and lets a lot of the air out of his otherwise well thought out and crafted arguments.

Sad.
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


Mark I. Jamison
4.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant thesis diminished by the author's blindness.
Reviewed in the United States on July 29, 2021
Verified Purchase
Rauch's thesis is brilliant. His arguments mirror those of philosopher Michael Lynch, an epistemologist of the first degree. Unfortunately Rauch trolls himself by not acknowledging and fully disclosing his own priors. He doesn't take his own advice and prescription. The majority of his references are from right wing outlets, many of which are funded by the Kochs and Scaifes. His chapter on cancel culture has good insights but is heavily weighted towards examples in the liberal academy, some of which are overblown. In some cases his argument sounds more like a call for affirmative action for conservaties, valuing diversity of opinion over accuracy, factualness, or quality. His media criticisms go easy on right wing media.
The concept of a Constitution of Knowledge and the idea that we should vigorously and openly discuss issues while continually questioning our priors and subjecting our facts to scrutiny is undeniably correct. Mr. Rauch doesn't hold himself to his own justifiably high standards, instead falling prey to the standard right wing tactic of grievance mongering.
Lynch's "In Praise of Reason" takes on the same issues in a much more honest manner.
2 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report abuse
    Showing 0 comments

There was a problem loading comments right now. Please try again later.


  • ←Previous page
  • Next page→

Need customer service? Click here
‹ See all details for The Constitution of Knowledge: A Defense of Truth
Back to top
Get to Know Us
  • Careers
  • Blog
  • About Amazon
  • Sustainability
  • Press Center
  • Investor Relations
  • Amazon Devices
Make Money with Us
  • Sell products on Amazon
  • Sell apps on Amazon
  • Become an Affiliate
  • Become a Delivery Driver
  • Start a package delivery business
  • Advertise Your Products
  • Self-Publish with Us
  • Host an Amazon Hub
  • ›See More Ways to Make Money
Amazon Payment Products
  • Amazon Rewards Visa Signature Cards
  • Amazon.com Store Card
  • Amazon Secured Card
  • Amazon Business Card
  • Amazon Business Line of Credit
  • Shop with Points
  • Credit Card Marketplace
  • Reload Your Balance
  • Amazon Currency Converter
Let Us Help You
  • Amazon and COVID-19
  • Your Account
  • Your Orders
  • Shipping Rates & Policies
  • Amazon Prime
  • Returns & Replacements
  • Manage Your Content and Devices
  • Amazon Assistant
  • Help
EnglishChoose a language for shopping.
United StatesChoose a country/region for shopping.
Amazon Music
Stream millions
of songs
Amazon Advertising
Find, attract, and
engage customers
Amazon Drive
Cloud storage
from Amazon
6pm
Score deals
on fashion brands
AbeBooks
Books, art
& collectibles
ACX
Audiobook Publishing
Made Easy
Alexa
Actionable Analytics
for the Web
 
Sell on Amazon
Start a Selling Account
Amazon Business
Everything For
Your Business
Amazon Fresh
Groceries & More
Right To Your Door
AmazonGlobal
Ship Orders
Internationally
Home Services
Experienced Pros
Happiness Guarantee
Amazon Ignite
Sell your original
Digital Educational
Resources
Amazon Web Services
Scalable Cloud
Computing Services
 
Audible
Listen to Books & Original
Audio Performances
Book Depository
Books With Free
Delivery Worldwide
Box Office Mojo
Find Movie
Box Office Data
ComiXology
Thousands of
Digital Comics
DPReview
Digital
Photography
East Dane
Designer Men's
Fashion
Fabric
Sewing, Quilting
& Knitting
 
Goodreads
Book reviews
& recommendations
IMDb
Movies, TV
& Celebrities
IMDbPro
Get Info Entertainment
Professionals Need
Kindle Direct Publishing
Indie Digital & Print Publishing
Made Easy
Amazon Photos
Unlimited Photo Storage
Free With Prime
Prime Video Direct
Video Distribution
Made Easy
Shopbop
Designer
Fashion Brands
 
Amazon Warehouse
Great Deals on
Quality Used Products
Whole Foods Market
America’s Healthiest
Grocery Store
Woot!
Deals and
Shenanigans
Zappos
Shoes &
Clothing
Ring
Smart Home
Security Systems
eero WiFi
Stream 4K Video
in Every Room
Blink
Smart Security
for Every Home
 
  Neighbors App
Real-Time Crime
& Safety Alerts
Amazon Subscription Boxes
Top subscription boxes – right to your door
PillPack
Pharmacy Simplified
Amazon Renewed
Like-new products
you can trust
   
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Notice
  • Interest-Based Ads
© 1996-2021, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates