Beauty MagazinestoInspire STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc PCB DG Limited time offer Wickedly Prime Handmade Wedding Shop Home Gift Guide Father's Day Gifts Home Gift Guide Book House Cleaning dyinguphere dyinguphere dyinguphere  Introducing Echo Show All-New Fire HD 8, starting at $79.99 Kindle Oasis Bob Marley Shop Now toystl17_gno

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Showing 1-10 of 26 reviews(Verified Purchases). See all 33 reviews
on January 21, 2014
Very good insight on how to view the innovation process. However this is marketed as a new edition, but it certainly doesn't feel like it. Examples do not reflect changes in industry since the original was written.

So if you read the original edition, not worth investing in this update. But if you did not read the original then this is definitely worth reading. All of those reviews are still relevant.
44 comments| 25 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on September 28, 2016
Good information, but a little outdated. This is the same as the 2003 edition of the book, just with a new cover.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on April 6, 2014
The book repeats most everything from the "Dilemma" book and, unless readers want some interesting historical examples, there is no need to read the first.

The most suitable prerequisites and circumstances for hatching successful disruptive businesses are explained in detail. These are suggested as the main route to predictable growth for existing and new companies.

The book is quite repetitive and I suspect it to somewhat oversimplify complex issues, also using a scientific language while offering theories that aren't really proven. However the ideas presented and the clearly structured content convincingly offer the reader insights into margin fluctuations in the value network and the logic of growth.

You quickly get used to the author calling him selves "we", like if the book was actually a scientific publication.

Highly recommended, also if you have already read the "Dilemma" book.
11 comment| 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on December 8, 2016
wow, what a great book. I've read a lot about innovation lately, but this one stands shoulders above the rest. The methodological approach, validation and general scientific approach impresses. If you're into innovation: a must have.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on August 26, 2016
Great description of a theory that is always there, but have never been conceived consciously. Surely will reread it several times, because, though the book is easy to read, the theory is so solid, that it will take some time to grasp all the nuances!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on May 23, 2017
Ok but dated. Simple concept that, in my view, could be communicated more concisely.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on January 29, 2017
A great and still fresh work about innovation and a roadmap for those who intend to implement an innovation program at their organizations
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on October 13, 2016
good read on innovation, worth the time
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on October 13, 2016
very good content, hard to understand!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on March 24, 2016
I don't like many business/management books. Many seem short on insightful data analysis, and long on personality worship and the solution currently in fashion. Christensen's book has loads of analytical support for his conclusions, and from those analyses he has produced an actionable framework for the development and execution of business strategy. Along with the prior book, The Innovator's Dilemma, this is one of the best business books I've read.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What's this?)