Top critical review
2 people found this helpful
3.0 out of 5 starsSome visual shortcomings, but still a good story.
ByRaisuli the Magnificenton April 11, 2017
The bad first; this does not look like a 4k transfer to me. In fact it looks like an attempt to restore the broadcast print with some digital inserts of perhaps footage that was lost. The image seems grainier than I remember it, and it almost looks like someone got the anamorphic aspect lens wrong when it came to either transferring this to digital or video format because some of the faces, in particular David Niven and Gregory Peck's faces look somewhat squat in a few shots. If what I've cited here is in fact true, and not my imagination, then it's a shame, and this film deserves a better transfer.
The positives; it's a good WW2 Adventure yarn about taking out some massive gun emplacements on a captured Greek Island. It's got highs, it's got lows, it's got close shaves, narrow escapes, espionage black-ops stuff in a 1940s WW2 manner, and just a real good action film to watch that didn't rely on too many SFX shots.
Some bad SFX pop up; notably the gun miniatures themselves, and the fake ocean backdrop used during the scenes with the guns, but those are minor compared to the scope and scale of the adventure. Remember, this is a time before Kubrick and Lucas had refined the miniature technique, and the SFX team did what they could.
But, again, the real charm of this film is that it doesn't rely on rapid fire cuts, it doesn't rely on over the top CGI and digital effects, it doesn't have a pounding rock score or borrowed Japanese anime filming techniques that I think Tarantino pioneered for contemporary Hollywood action films. "The Guns of Navarone" uses old fashioned action film making techniques where the takes are a little longer, and the action itself accentuates the story, and not the other way around.
It also has some pretty deep psychological plot twists that, as a younger man or boy when I first saw this film, I just didn't get. I do now, and wow, when it comes to human nature the more things change the more they stay the same, and it's films like this that remind us of why we fight and what we're fighting for.
But, like I say, the transfer and restoration, to me, aren't what they could be. I've seen this film dozens of times on TV in the 70s and 80s, and have watched the DVD and now bluray a couple of times. Whether it's the transfer bringing out the limitations in the visual information of the original film, or if someone dropped the ball during the digitizing process, I cannot say. But, to me, when I compare it to something like "Hello Dolly" or some maybe even a Doris Day or Woody Allen film, or some film that came out in the early 70s or 60s, those films, by comparison, look a bit clearer, less grainy, and have the right aspect ratio for the image. I'm just not sure why this film has the quirks that I've noted in this review.
Even so, It's still a good movie to watch. Marginally far fetched, but a lot of good stories are.