Amazon Vehicles Beauty STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Limited time offer Wickedly Prime Handmade Wedding Shop Shop Popular Services twinpeaksv2 twinpeaksv2 twinpeaksv2  Introducing Echo Show All-New Fire 7, starting at $49.99 Kindle Oasis Trade it in. Fund the next. Shop Now Ellen
Customer Review

188 of 233 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars The authors didn't do their homework, November 3, 2012
This review is from: Killing Kennedy: The End of Camelot (Hardcover)
O'Reilly and Dugard write a riveting narrative interweaving the lives of President Kennedy, his brother Robert, Lee Harvey Oswald and Johnson and all the important people and events surrounding the Kennedy presidency. As an historical narrative, the reader is drawn closer and closer to the day of the assassination and follows the lives and events of the period involving the two principals, John Kennedy and Oswald, as the horrible day draws near. The narrative proceeds in a manner which would indicate the authors have a strong control of the facts of both the personal lives of the two men but also of the events of the era.

Then we come to the assassination itself. According to the authors, Oswald is already at 12:14 p.m. standing at the sixth-floor window holding his rifle diagonally across his body. Shooting standing up, Oswald fires three shots, two of which hit the President -- one in the "back of his lower neck" and another "travels all the way through the brain and out the front of the skull." Kennedy's hand reflexively goes to the top of his head. "But now the top of his head is gone."

The plausibility of their narrative of Oswald-- their interpretation of his life, his motives and particularly his actions that day, in fact depend on the accuracy of their claims of the nature of the President's wounding, and it is here that neither author has done his homework. The two best sources we have for the actual nature of the President's wounds as first viewed would be the depositions of the Parkland doctors and nurses, their contemporaneous notes, and the earliest interviews of them, the latter of which are found in David Lifton's Best Evidence. It is well-known that at the press conference attending the announcement of Kennedy's death, the transcript of which the WC did not publish, that three times Dr. Perry is quoted as saying the wound in the front of Kennedy's throat was an entrance wound, the report of which went out through the UPI at 3:10 CST. Later on Nov 26 Dr. Kemp Clark would tell the New York Times the bullet entered Kennedy's neck, "ranged downward, and did not exit." The first doctor to see the wound, Dr. Carrico, also described the the wound as a "small penetrating wound of the anterior neck in the lower one-third." Before the Warren Commission, Nurse Henchcliff made the same observation. In his WC deposition, Dr. Ronald Jones said "The hole was very small and relatively clean-cut as you would see in a bullet that is entering rather than exiting a patient." Dr. Chrenshaw in his book Conspiracy of Silence p. 79 also identified the wound as one of entry."There was no doubt in my mind about that wound. I had seen dozens of them in the emergency room."

Because Perry performed a tracheotomy incision over the wound, an incision he told Lifton was 2-3 centimeters in 1966, at the Bethesda autopsy the wound was not recognized as such and in the FBI autopsy report by agents Sibert and O'Neill is unmentioned. Instead the FBI report describes Humes probing a shallow back wound right where the death certificate places it: at the level of the third thoracic vertebra. Corroborating the FBI reports are interviews (by Lifton and Law) of personnel at Bethesda who witnessed attempts at probing the wound, including James Curtis Jenkins and Paul O'Connor. Significantly, the neck area was not dissected and on Friday night the shallow back wound represented all that was known about Kennedy's non-fatal wounding. William Law's book, In the Eye of History, contains extensive interviews with the FBI agents on this very point. Clint Hill is brought to the morgue late at night, approximately 2:45 a.m., to verify the location of this wound, and he verifies its location as 6 inches down from the top of the shoulder, consistent with the death certificate.

The Warren Commission, however, attempted to erase the shoulder wound from history. It did not call FBI agents Sibert and O'Neill as witnesses nor publish their autopsy report in the 26 volumes; instead they squirreled it to the National Archives. In a very bold lie, the report consigns the non-transiting shoulder wound as mere speculation early in the autopsy. But the FBI report, the witnesses to Humes' probing of the wound, and Clint Hill's late night verification of its location are a matter or record.

It is only later, and probably Saturday morning, after the body has left the morgue and out of reach of the autopsy doctors, that Dr. Humes learns there is bullet wound in the front of Kennedy's throat, and this has to be accounted for. He admits burning a draft of the original autopsy, and by Sunday, the shallow back wound will rise to become a transiting neck wound, with a bullet entering Kennedy just to the right of the spine, exiting the midline of the throat without hitting any vertebrae, and proceeding onward to to hit Connally, destroy 5 inches of rib, shatter his right wrist, and end up in his thigh, all with little deformation or loss of metal. Thus was born the "magic bullet," required to account for a wound that never existed, and to conceal a wound that everyone at Bethesda saw, reported by the FBI and on Kennedy's own death certificate.

Now on to the head wound.

The first to see the head wound were Jackie Kennedy and Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent who climbed aboard the limo before it sped off to Parkland hospital. Hill: "The right rear portion of his head was missing. It was lying in the rear seat of his car." O'Reilly claims, in a statement without foundation in the autopsy report, official x-rays or photos, that a bullet entering the skull exploded "the thin wall of bone as it exists the front of the skull." But what does Jackie tell the WC? Jackie: "From the front there was nothing...but from the back you could see you know, you were trying to hold his hair on and his skull on."

And what was observed at Parkland corrobrates Clint Hill and Jackie Kennedy, the first witnesses. In his WC testimony, Dr. McClelland: "I was in a position that I could very closely examine the head wound, and I noted that the right posterior portion of the skull and been extremely blasted." The bones in the right rear were sprung open "in such a way that you could actually look down into the skull cavity itself and see that probably a third or so, at least, of the brain tissue, posterior cerebral and some of the cerebellar tissue had been blasted out." Dr. Jones described before the WC an exit wound in the rear of the skull. Dr. Peters described "a large defect in the occiput," and gave a more precise description to Lifton (p. 324, Best Evidence) which stressed how far back in the head the wound was. Dr. Chrenshaw, present in Trauma Room 1, drew diagrams of the wound for the ARRB consistent with the above descriptions.

But what of the author's contention that the top of Kennedy's head was gone, and the bullet exited the front of Kennedy's skull? No such wounds were reported at Parkland. Upon entering Trauma Room 1, nurse Audrey Bell had to ask Dr. Perry where the wound was in Kennedy's head, whereupon Perry turned Kennedy's head to the left, revealing the right rear posterior wound. Her recollection that the top of the skull and front were entirely intact is shared unanimously by those at Parkland in their earliest statements. The Parkland verdict: Kennedy was shot from the front, and the body told the story unambiguously. The face was clear, the bones in the back of the head sprung open, with no obvious injury to the top of the skull.

So what does this do to O'Reilly's 300 plus page artifice? It tears it down like a house of cards. The problems with conflicting medical evidence is so great in this case whole volumes have been devoted to it, and the authors simply didn't do their homework. Those first on the scene and able to describe the President's wounds exonerate Oswald as Kennedy's murderer. The case is much too deep and complicated for a popular book such as this, and frankly, it never should have been written. The authors are simply in well over their heads. For a better picture of the medical evidence, it is still hard to improve upon Best Evidence; one would do well to read Doug Horne's 5 volume work Inside the ARRB and William Law's In the Eye of History. These give a more complete picture of the strange and distrubing picture that emerges from the events following Kennedy's murder. There is so much more to the story that has to be told.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the guidelines and FAQs here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 13 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Nov 3, 2012, 10:27:23 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012, 10:37:13 AM PDT
Ralph Yates says:
Texas School Book Depository secretary Carolyn Arnold saw Lee Harvey Oswald in the lunchroom at 12:25, not 12:15. Her statement to FBI was altered and changed to 12:15. Like most Texas citizens she trusted the authority of FBI. It was only years later when researchers showed Ms Arnold her statement that she noticed they changed it.

What this proves is that Lee Harvey Oswald was not in the sniper's nest on the 6th floor during the assassination. No one who planned to assassinate the president would be sitting eating lunch alone at the scheduled time of the motorcade. The motorcade was scheduled to pass by the Depository at 12:25. It was 5 minutes late. There's no way Oswald would have been sitting in the lunchroom at 12:25, as Carolyn Arnold witnessed, if he had intended to shoot the president. Also, Oswald came up baby's butt clean on his gunpowder residue paraffin test at the Dallas Police station. As FBI agent Turner proved, it was impossible to have no nitrate residue on your cheek after firing the notoriously-leaky Carcano rifle.

The reason they killed Lt Commander Pitzer is because they forgot he was manning his remote video equipment as was his job to do that evening at Bethesda. When they snuck Kennedy in for the pre-autopsy alteration of the wounds they screwed-up and forgot Pitzer was filming. This is why Dennis David was able to see a clear entry wound in Kennedy's right temple on Pitzer's frames. Pitzer filmed the pre-autopsy. CIA murdered him for it.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012, 10:53:59 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012, 10:54:29 AM PDT
In a small review, I was not able to comment on O'Reilly's claim that Oswald was in the sniper's nest by 12:15, nor the lie that he dropped the weapon and took off. One could write so much more on what O'Reilly doesn't know, or deliberately concealed, regarding the circumstances in Dealey Plaza, the events following at Parkland and the strange machinations at Bethesda.

Posted on Nov 3, 2012, 12:04:00 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012, 12:04:52 PM PDT
Albert Doyle says:
Yes, Daniel. One could, but O'Reilly didn't.

These frivolous 5-star reviewers speak a sad message about America and its grand claim to democracy.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 3, 2012, 1:26:30 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Nov 3, 2012, 1:30:23 PM PDT
I couldn't agree more, Albert. I can't respect O'Reilly for this travesty, foisting on a gullible public the notion that this is really history. He has mainstreamed and legitimized ignorance of one of the pivotal moments in the 20th century.

Posted on Nov 6, 2012, 4:24:21 AM PST
Daniel, your "Killing Kennedy" review is both helpful and informative. You've obviously done a great deal of reading and research. Like you I'd like to know the truth about Kennedy's assassination and appreciate your two references "Conspiracy of Silence" and "In the Eye of History." I'd be very interested in your reaction to George B. Mettler's book "Secrets and Lies: Memoir of the Kennedy Years."

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 7, 2012, 12:38:06 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 7, 2012, 12:38:42 PM PST
Niki, I read your post with very great interest, and asked about Mettler on the Education Forum (Spartacus) of which I am a member. John Simpkin, founder of the Kennedy Assassination part of the forum, said this was a man to be reckoned with, and that's a high endorsement. I will read the book and I work in the math department at Pasadena City College; you can find my site there and email me should you so desire. Thanks for taking time to comment, dan

Posted on Nov 8, 2012, 8:26:20 PM PST
Kevin says:
Excellent post, Daniel. I can only agree that O'Reilly knows his audience wouldn't be able to get through a tome like JFK & the Unspeakable, or the ARRB Review by Doug Horne (I love Vol IV regarding the editing of the Zapruder film - what would O'Reilly do with that info?? His head would explode, no pun intended). The sheep love a quickie read, so O'Reilly had to go the way he did. Remember, O'Reilly did a piece in 1989 as a reporter regarding the CIA's involvement in JFK's murder (YouTube) - funny how he didn't bother to include that in his refererences. I wish everyone who "loves" this book so much could read LBJ-Mastermind of the JFK Assassination just to see what they would think then! Keep the faith.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 8, 2012, 10:20:35 PM PST
Kevin, I used to watch OReilly's program frequently. Since the publication of this vile offense against truth and reason, I haven't been able to turn to the Factor. He has lost all credibility. What hurts the most is his claim to have been factual: "please know that this is a fact-based book.." No Bill, it's a book to make you rich and popular, and that's it.

Posted on Oct 18, 2013, 11:43:23 AM PDT
Mevashir says:
Superb review. Now you know why they call him Bull O Really?

Here's what I wrote to him and his co-author Dugin about his new book Killing Jesus:

"A question for Mr. O'Reilly: if you have stonewalled and ridiculed 9-11 Truth for the past 12 years, why should we believe that you are able to correctly analyze an historical event with infinitely less documentation from almost 2000 years ago?"

Posted on Aug 12, 2016, 3:24:03 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Aug 12, 2016, 3:24:46 PM PDT
Boyce Hart says:
Everyone owes it to open mindedness and the Enlightenment values some once aspired to; read JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He died and Why It Matters by James W. Douglass. You will immediately understand why reference to this book caused PBS to censor RFK Jr. The Charlie Rose? Post taping. You will immediately see the real reason Alec Baldwin's TV show was cancelled by MSNBC.

Be absolutely certain that you compare the footnotes. If you find Bill's, some people here might be grateful but that elections going to Congress, cause neither side got 270.
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Pasadena, California USA

Top Reviewer Ranking: 1,173,804