513 of 521 people found the following review helpful
Great for the money, but don't expect miracles,
Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: PLR Optics 4PC LENS-63 52mm +1 +2 +4 +10 Close-Up Macro Filter Set with Pouch (Camera)
I occasionally dabble in macro, but nowhere near enough to justify the outrageous sums dedicated macro lenses go for. So, I thought I'd pick these up.
First, a nice bonus was that it comes with a compact filter case with 4 lens slots. I ordered this product without realizing it came with that, so that was quite the pleasant surprise, as it's actually a pretty nice, albeit small, filter case. I actually connect the 1 to the 2 and the 4 to the 10 when I store them, opening up two slots, which allows me to carry a UV filter and a polarizing filter as well. Which is really nice when I'm just carrying a small camera bag to not need two separate filter cases. The lens cloth is reasonably good.
On to the actual filters. If you go into them with reasonable expectations, it's hard to be disappointed with them. Attaching them to my 55-200 nikkor telephoto lens results in pretty good, pretty sharp pictures. The more you stack them, the more your image will degrade, but you can still get reasonably decent images even with all four stacked. if you stack, stack from most magnification closest to the lens to weakest magnification furthest from your lens, otherwise your focus and depth of field will go crazy and you'll get all kinds of weird aberrations in your image). Also, make sure you regularly clean them, as any smudges or dust will, shockingly, get magnified.
Be aware that these will make your camera have a difficult time autofocusing, as the computer has no idea that these things are on the end of the lens, and thus its normal tricks don't work as well. However, if you're doing macro, you want to use manual focus anyway, even if you have a dedicated macro lens you want to use manual focus, so that's not really a negative in my eyes.
Also, be aware that like any macro filters, they reduce depth of field, meaning you'll want to shoot with as high of a number f stop as possible (that is your aperture as small as possible, high f/stop = low aperture), otherwise you'll find yourself with a depth of field that can only be measured in milimieters (literally, with a small (wide open) f stop, and all four stacked, your depth of field will be less than a about a half millimeter!)
Also, be aware that since things are magnified here, that any camera shake is magnified as well. Meaning that you'll want to use a tripod if at all possible. You can occasionally get good results hand shooting, but you'll get more consistently sharp results with a tripod. And a tripod will also be beneficial because, due to the high f/stop you'll need to get the depth of field you'll want, you may need both a high ISO and a long shutter speed.
If you buy these thinking you can just throw them on the end of your kit lens, use autofocus and BAM, get pro level macro photos, you'll be pretty unhappy. BUt if you know what you're buying, they're a pretty outstanding little set. I almost gave these 5 stars, because they're a great value, and you really can't expect anything more than what they give you from any macro filters, regardless of price. However, I didn't want to mislead. If macro photography is your thing you WILL need a macro lens to get the type of sharpness that field really demands. If you just occasionally dabble in macro when you happen across something interesting, they really are hard to beat.
edit: I think a lot of people newer to macro photography try these out, and thus, I see that a lot of reviews are complaining about things that don't really have anything to do with these filters, but just have to do with macro photography. Three complaints stand out as being complaints about macro photography more than these filters:
First, when you're zoomed in and magnified this much, you HAVE to shoot from a tripod. Any camera shake is going to be magnified. SO, I think a lot of the 'blurry' complaints stem from people trying ot use these handheld. Don't bother with macro if you aren't going to shoot with a tripod and a trigger release (remote control shutter button) or a timer.
Second, don't shoot macro on autofocus. autofocus isn't made for macrophotography. It has nothing to do with these filters. The camera just gets really confused by macro photography. Even a dedicated macro lens will only get you roughly in the ball park focus wise, and many of the best macro lenses don't autofocus at all. If you're going to do macro, then you need to use manual focus.
Third, your subjects need to be relatively still. Because macro involves relatively long shutter speeds, you'll need to shoot still subjects. Or at the very least, take a ton of shots and hope that the object stayed still in a few of them. Again, this has nothing to do with these filters, that's just the way macro photography is.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-9 of 9 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Jun 30, 2012 3:05:30 PM PDT
W. Tarldon Neese says:
Now that is convincing. Sounds like a review from a comprehending photographer. I am considering these filters myself. I shoot a lot of very small wild flowers and some insects and small fauna such as "green lizards". I have a Nikon D5100 and a dissecting bioscope with a photo-pod, but my Nikon 8008 adapter does not work with the D5100; the camera always knows there is no lens attached and the shutter won't fire, even on manual settings. At this time in life, this photography is only for my own entertainment and occasional use in teaching middle school students in entomological studies. I will try these filters. Thanks for the time spent detailing the filter loading sequence, etc.. Will save 'discovery time' of my own.
Posted on Sep 1, 2012 9:38:09 AM PDT
Amazon Customer says:
Very nicely written. Thank you.
Posted on Nov 26, 2012 7:35:41 AM PST
Great review: thoughtful and actually helpful. Thank you for taking the time to post this in-depth review. As a (sometimes and completely amateur) photographer I occasionally dabble with macro and these looked intriguing. Having a review like this helps separate the marketing hype from the realities. Again, thank you.
Posted on Jul 19, 2013 3:58:46 AM PDT
Kenya Brooks says:
Thank you so much, great review.
Posted on Nov 19, 2013 7:38:18 AM PST
Anil Bakshi says:
My simple question : Should we call these as Macro Filters or "add on macro lens" ?
I guess it is a convex lens that magnifies, reduces min focusing distance.
Posted on Jan 6, 2014 1:55:25 PM PST
Trish C says:
2 year old review, but THANK YOU nonetheless. You've helped me far more then any instructions would ever be able to!! Thank you for taking the time to care about leaving the PRODUCT review and being so keen on the things others may be complaining about.
Well wishes to you and yours in beginning this year, 2014!!!
Posted on May 1, 2014 12:11:36 AM PDT
E. Kohler says:
Thank you very much, your review helped me a lot!
Posted on Jan 30, 2015 8:51:47 AM PST
Thanks VERY much! I'm going to get these.
Posted on Aug 21, 2016 8:42:16 PM PDT
Larry L. says:
I have shot macro for years with film slrs and macro lenses. The above is an excellent primer for anyone new to macro photography.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›