Even the questions the initial "publisher's review" asks assume entirely too much to be taken seriously. The question is: Is there any peer-reviewed, falsifiable evidence for the existence (to say nothing of the active involvement) of an omniscient, omnipresent deity? Of course, the answer is "no." Any inference otherwise invariably descends to fear and invective. Science does not --and cannot-- support mysticism (otherwise known as "religion.") Read Dawkins' books. The truth will, indeed, set you free.
28 people found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?