21 of 31 people found the following review helpful
How to create cost-effective benefits for everyone's health and health care,
This review is from: Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results (Hardcover)
Those who have read Porter's previously published On Competition no doubt recall the excellent material on which he and Teisberg collaborated in Chapter 12, "Making Competition in Health Care Work," originally published in Harvard Business Review (July/August 1994). They collaborate again on this volume in which they examine health care issues in three broad areas: "The first is the cost of and access to health insurance. The second is standards for coverage, or the types of care that should be covered by insurance versus being the responsibility of the individual. The third is the structure of health care delivery itself." Porter and Teisberg explain why the only way to truly reform health care is to reform the nature of competition itself. More specifically, to transform health care by realigning competition with value for patients."How to do so is the central focus of this book."
How to explain dysfunctional competition in health care? Porter and Teisberg suggest several which include "misaligned incentives and a series if understandable but unfortunate strategic, organizational, and regulatory choices by each participant in the system that feed on and exacerbate each other. All actors in the system share responsibility for the problem....The problem is that competition does not take place at the medical condition level, nor over the full care cycle. Competition is the current system is at the same time too broad, too narrow, and too local."
This year in the United States alone, at least $2 trillion will be spent on health care, and costs will continue to escalate. While conducting their research, Porter and Teisberg concluded that there should be no presumption that good quality of health care is more costly. On the contrary, they learned that "better providers are usually more efficient. Good quality is less costly because of more accurate diagnoses, fewer treatment errors, lower complication rates, faster recovery, less invasive treatment, and the minimization of the need for treatment. More broadly, better health is less expensive than illness. Better providers can often earn higher margins at the same or lower prices...so quality improvement does not require ever-escalating costs."
Porter and Teisberg have a convincing, indeed compelling argument in support of value-based competition on results in health care within a system which is "ripe for change"...and change for the better but not for the costlier if competition in health care is redefined and then conducted as Porter and Teisberg advocate. One of the most important benefits would be that the changes they propose would be self-reinforcing. "Changes by health plans and providers to compete on values will reinforce and magnify each other, and will spur innovation by suppliers. As consumers and employers adopt these principles, providers and health plans will be more motivated, and more able, to improve the value they deliver."
For these and other reasons, it is imperative to redefine health care by redefining the nature of health care competition. The alternatives and, especially, the implications and consequences of those alternatives are unacceptable. As noted earlier, "How to do so is the central focus of this book."