Amazon Vehicles Up to 80 Percent Off Textbooks Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it $5 Albums Fire TV Stick Happy Belly Snacks Totes Summer-Event-Garden Amazon Cash Back Offer TheKicks TheKicks TheKicks  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis Celine Dion Shop Now STEM
Customer Review

37 of 98 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars talented but glum, February 13, 2003
This review is from: Stories of Your Life and Others (Hardcover)
(WARNING! I am a science-fiction writer in economic competition with Mr. Chiang. All my gripes must be taken with a grain of salt.)
Eight well-crafted stories with engaging and interesting ideas are marred by weak endings. Each story ends with tepid pessimism.
First, the "Tower of Babylon" tale engages the reader with solid characterization and a thought-provoking description of what the mighty engineering feat of "building a tower to heaven" would have been like, had the world been flat. It is filled with amusing and authentic touches, like the Egyptian stone-masons brought in to chip through the hard surface of the sky-dome, or the description of how mid-levels of the tower rendered inhospitable by the too-near approach of the fiery sun. But the ending is weak, and the immense tower turns out to have been built in vain.
In "Understand" the super intelligent man is obsessed with finding a perfect expression of linguistic philosophy that will express the universe. The depiction of a mind smarter than any mind of man is wonderfully well-done, and the story is worth reading just for this alone. The super-mind discovers a second super intelligent man. One man wants nothing but to be left alone while he pursues his research, while the other wishes to use his powers to benefit mankind peacefully. Neither one is threatening or interfering with the goals of the other. For no apparent reason, and without any plot-purpose, these two "superior intelligences" both mutually agree that there is no possible way they both can exist, they duel, and one murders the other. What a waste. Maybe they were not so bright after all.
In "Story of your Life" a mother, through the study of an alien language, learns how to see the universe from a timeless point of view. She knows her daughter is going to die in a pointless accident even before the night the daughter is conceived. The mother does nothing, and can do nothing, to prevent the accident, since only those things that are fated to be will be. Precognition is vain.
In "Divide by Zero" all mathematics turns out to be vain.
"Liking What You See: A Documentary" once again, starts with a very interesting science fiction premise: what would the world be like if we could turn off our perception of human beauty? And, once again, the story soon disappoints. A college is debating whether to impose beauty-blindness on all its students. Both sides of the issue are debated. A girl who tries to make herself look nice to win the affection of a boy she loves is rebuffed when the boy turns off his beauty-seeing abilities. The girl realizes it is "unfair" to look better than other people. So her attempts are futile. In the end, an evil conspiracy of (I am not making this up) Big Lipstick Companies successfully prevents widespread implementation of the beauty-blindness plan by (you guessed it) having a particularly attractive spokeswoman sway the debate. So the entire debate was futile. This same egalitarian theme appears in a famous short story by Kurt Vonnegut, one where pretty folk were burned with acid, and smart individuals were lobotimized, so that everyone was "equal" and nothing would rouse the spite and envy of the herd. There, Vonnegut's tale cheers for the individual; here, Chiang's tale cheers for the herd.
"The Evolution of Human Science" has all scientific inquiry prove futile once super artificial intelligences take over the field.
The satire "Hell is the Absence of God" reads like it was written by someone who never met a Christian, or read anything written by a Christian. In this tale, those who see the light of heaven are grotesquely disfigured (their eyes and eye sockets are removed) and loose free will, and become perfect in faith, so that they are automatically assured of entrance into paradise. The main character, mourning after the death of his wife, seeks to find a spot where an angel is leaving or entering the world, so that he can, if only for a moment, glimpse the light of heaven, so that he can loose his eyes and his free will, but be assured of meeting his wife again in heaven. All goes as planned, but God capriciously sends the man to Hell in any case. Hell is not a place of torment, but a bland area much like earth, merely separate from God, peopled by Fallen Angels who sin was not rebellion, but free-thinking. Hence, out of all created beings, only the main character is actually suffering in Hell, since he is the only one who longs not to be there, and, thanks to his free will being destroyed, is the only one who loves God wholeheartedly. Again, all efforts of the main character to rejoin his wife are futile. There are secondary characters whose lives are also ruined and for no particular reason.
I myself am an unrepentant atheist, but I would never pen such trite antichristian propaganda. If an author is going to set a story in an alternate universe where the Christian myths happen to be true, the author should become familiar with (or, at least, hide his contempt for) the source material. Read Thomas Aquinas or John Milton. Christians may be wrong, but they are not stupid.
Over all, Mr. Chiang is an excellent writer, who writes wonderfully about big ideas, but weds them to a theme of dispirited nihilism. He is capable of subtle and penetrating characterization, except when he trots out a tired leftwing cliché, whereupon suddenly everything becomes flat and predictable (see, for example, his treatment of the CIA, Big Business, the Military, and the Victorian Age).
I can only reccommend the first half of each story.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 3 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 13 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Mar 28, 2007 6:21:43 AM PDT
J. Kessel says:
I don't find this a very persuasive review. The reviewer seems to want to force his own ideological template onto every story rather than to respond to what the stories give him. He also misrepresents the stories. For instance, in "Story of Your Life" the main character does not have precognition of her daughter's death, but has learned to see her life as a whole, from beginning to end, "after the fact." In essence he's missing the very point of the story by forcing on it a time-bound vision on it when the whole idea is that time-bound visions are distorting and incomplete. The question of "free will" vs. "Predestination" is irrelevant to this story.

At the very lest, the review seems a little cranky.

Posted on Aug 24, 2007 9:00:00 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Aug 24, 2007 9:07:45 AM PDT
Anastasia says:
Unrepentant atheist? If this is the John C. Wright of "The Golden Age," then reading his blog as of mid-2007 he is now an out-and-proud Christian. I disagree with his opinion that the endings are weak and depressing (also, the two aren't equivalent). The Tower of Babylon had not been built in vain - it was a testament to humanity's drive, ambition, and curiosity for knowledge - and actually led to a scientific revelation. If anything, the original version of the story in the Bible is a lot more pointless and depressing.

And about "Story of Your Life" and "Hell is the Absence of God" - I'll admit my bias, because I thought they were brilliant - but I suspect that Mr. Wright's problem withm this is the atheist, almost nihilist/Nieztschean stance they take. Not every joy or pain has a meaning or a purpose. Sometimes, life or suffering just *is*. That doesn't make it pointless or depressing. It makes it life. And God - if he exists, then he's probably just as portrayed by Chiang - a random, brutal force of nature.

Nihilism only appears dispiriting if you disagree. Life's beautiful in itself.

Posted on Jan 31, 2008 4:38:51 PM PST
Last edited by the author on Jan 31, 2008 4:40:01 PM PST
Grano Salis says:
I tried to take this review with a grain of salt, but it still left a bitter taste. Were the reviewer sees the title story as a study in futility, I found an uplifting and holistic a-temporal perspective. I can only recommend the first sentence of the review.

Posted on Sep 9, 2009 1:46:39 AM PDT
rbnn says:
The good is the enemy of the best.

Posted on Oct 13, 2009 6:47:08 AM PDT
mostserene1 says:
A common ploy of theists is to pretend they are atheists in order to lend credibility to their vicious attacks on genuine atheists/agnostics.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 16, 2009 8:14:41 AM PST
Winterdark says:
A common ploy of the ignorant is to assume facts not in evidence. It is a common ploy of the dishonest to accuse others of being dishonest. John C. Wright was an atheist when he read and reviewed the stories here: you can look on his blog, as there is a public record, a date, when his conversion took place.

Posted on Jul 7, 2010 10:51:58 PM PDT
I don't get how you saw "antichristian propaganda" in "Hell is the Absence of God." It isn't supposed to be an accurate portrayal of the Christian worldview, anyway. From what I can tell, it works simultaneously as A) a satire of the worldview of Ye Olde Testament fundies and B) an elaborate metaphorical morality play about our inconsequential place in the universe and the ways in which we come to accept this. It works brilliantly in both regards.

And where you see nihilism, I see a humbled and realistic humanism. You seem to want simplistic, ideology-laden endings where good wins, evil loses, and everyone goes home with a smile. Sorry, but life isn't like that. Mr. Chiang writes stories about very psychologically real people.

Posted on Aug 9, 2010 6:38:46 PM PDT
[Deleted by the author on Aug 9, 2010 6:45:24 PM PDT]

Posted on Aug 9, 2010 6:49:59 PM PDT
D says:
In commenting on Mr. Wright's review, it's probably not worth discussing point by point its factual errors, seemingly intentional misrepresentation of plot points, or Mr. Wright's apparently now repented atheism in regard to one of the stories. So while I think that there are many failings in this review, the overriding problem is that its author completely ignores or is simply unaware of the underlying themes woven so skillfully into each of the stories and in so doing seems to miss the point of each one. To me the stories seem to come to conclusions in a way that not only seems satisfactory but almost compulsory, as if each story were created as a whole and that no other ending could really have sufficed.

Posted on Oct 13, 2010 10:48:15 PM PDT
Mr. Wright diminishes himself with this review.
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details