Shop Auto Winter Products Salon Beauty Best Books of the Year Black Friday Deals Week nav_sap_hiltonhonors_launch For a limited time. 3 months for $0.99. Amazon Music Unlimited. New subscribers only. Terms and conditions apply. Electronics Gift Guide Starting at $39.99 Grocery Handmade Gift Shop Book a house cleaner for 2 or more hours on Amazon Early Black Friday deals: save 40% or more on Amazon Video Early Black Friday deals: save 40% or more on Amazon Video Early Black Friday deals: save 40% or more on Amazon Video  Three new members of the Echo family Save $50 on All-New Fire HD 10. Limited-time offer. $30 off Kindle Paperwhite GNO Shop Now HTL17_gno



on August 20, 2013
I love the idea behind this toy, but the execution falls flat. Here are pros and cons;

Pros:
1) Great idea/concept of matching story with the toy
2) Manual toy - no electricity or batteries involved. Forces kids to be proactive

Cons:
1) Poorly made - I don't know if this is a Q.C. problem (it's made in China) or just a bad design. The figures that you put on top of the yellow wheels do not fit snugly, so with the force of turning the wheels, they always fall off unless you pull the ribbon very carefully and slowly

2) Same problem with the handle - it does not fit snugly so cranking the wheels to wind up the ribbon is very frustrating process. The handle keeps coming off.

3) The story in the accompanying book is poorly written, contrived and frankly embarrassing to read out aloud. eg. The dog named "Nacho" who is not looking quite so "macho" squeals"Chorizo". Or when Goldie runs into a problem, she tries to solve the problem by thinking outside the box - "she even tries doing hula dances in hopes it will improve her chances" (direct quote from the book) This is no "Goodnight Moon" - Couldn't they have come up with better rhyme and stories...? I can't imagine anybody wanting to read this book more than once.

4) The actual toy is very limited in how to play. It is basically turning a wheel with a ribbon that is attached by a velcro. You get to choose the figures you want to put on the top of the wheel and the pattern you want to make by strategically placing the wheels on the board. In theory, you are suppose to be able to make various shapes such as crown, gingerbread man, lightning bolt,sand castle, happy face, mushroom, letter "L" and "G" etc. etc, but the board is about 10"x10" and the actual "play" area is even smaller than that (about 7.5"x7.5") There are only 5 wheels so most of the complicated shapes end up looking the same or indistinguishable. Also the more elaborate the shape, the more you end up using the ribbon (because of winding it through each wheels) and shorter the spinning time.

5) The spinning time is over in 3-5 seconds. (Yes it is that short!)

6) At over $30 (including tax) this item is way over priced for what it is. You are paying more for the novelty and the idea.

So with all the Cons outweighing the Pros, I'm still giving this three stars because I think the idea is good and promising. I think if they were to continue this series going vertical and horizontal (making Ferris Wheel for example with interchangeable parts and figures), it could become more interesting and maybe worth the price.

Finally, this is entertaining for my two year old daughter but I find it hard to believe that anyone over 6 years old can be entertained by this for more than 15 minutes, and come back to play this over and over again. Much as this has been compared to Lego, this is no Lego alternative.
728 helpful votes
729 helpful votes
|
1414 comments|Report abuse
on March 22, 2014
I bought this for my 6 yr old daughter on her birthday. I bought it because it was very highly rated on Amazon and because it had "Engineering Concepts". I did not research it in detail.

I want to be fair so I give what I thought was positive first. The game pieces are solid, the book is entertaining and the book and game work well together, making a story out of the instructions. On our first attempt, my 6 yr old had this sorted out on her own pretty much immediately. We had one piece that didn't spin and she diagnosed the reason right away, rebuilt it and was in action. So we didn't need about half the book. I am not sure she really learned anything, as it was very simple, though she really does like the pieces. Many of the other constructions described in the book are static and not very interesting. We also recently bought a "crazy action contraptions" lego book (with parts) by Doug Stillinger and I thought it was much better than this kit (and $10 less expensive). Much better kinematics, some projects using stored energy, I would recommend that book over this kit anyday.
6 helpful votes
7 helpful votes
|
0Comment|Report abuse
on April 22, 2014
First, ditto everything Ajaxtelamona said.

Second, my 6yo daughter was so excited to get this for her birthday last night. We played with it. It took maybe 15 minutes to get through the book, which is to set up the wheels to spin all the animals and then that's it. Yes, you can go back and put them rollers in different shapes (crown, star, etc.) but after 15 minutes of fun - a little trial & error, which made the success all the more fun - my kid said she hated it, it was boring.

I had to agree. There are too few parts to do much with it and it's way over-priced for 15 minutes of fun.

My kid LOVES building. She LOVES the book "Rosie Revere Engineer" and has her own engineering stash of paper towel tubes, pony tail holders, legos, tinker toys, pipe cleaners, various bits and bobs. Yet this game left her totally cold.

I really really wanted to love this game. I loved it from when it was a kickstarter. I'm so disappointed it was a dud. I find it hard to believe they played this with actual kids and didn't realize there wasn't much to do with it once you got it.
6 helpful votes
7 helpful votes
|
0Comment|Report abuse
on November 21, 2013
I really wanted to like this sooooo much!

Positives:
-1 star for the idea of creating something that was meant to inspire girls to ponder the STEM career fields and having some great viral marketing videos

Negatives:
-Poor quality for price
-Save some dusty shelf space: it really just does one thing and after one use (maybe two) nobody wants to play with it any more
-Really doesn't inspire creativity or "engineering" skills, no room for thinking outside the box
-If we are trying to empower girls, why does it have to be pink and purple?
-A thin Caucasian blonde wearing short shorts and a PINK toolbelt? Really?

If you want something to inspire your kids to actually learn something, and be creative "engineers" try these much better options:

Gears %C2%AE Beginners Building Set
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=bl_sr_toys-and-games?ie=UTF8&field-brandtextbin=Engino&node=165793011
Snap Circuits Jr SC 100 Kit
464 helpful votes
465 helpful votes
|
88 comments|Report abuse
on December 9, 2013
This was an attractive toy, and my girls (ages 7 and 9) liked it. As a parent, I am disappointed that this toy failed to live up to the hype started by the kickstarter video which stated that this toy will introduce girls to the basics of engineering. The video implied that the storybook would be filled with problems for the girls to solve by building contraptions. While the commercial was puffery, the implication was that this toy will inspire your girls to think like engineers, and possibly build Rube Golberg-like contraptions in your home.

The toy comes with one pegboard, one crank, one ribbon, ten axles, five blocks, five washers, five wheels, five characters that mount on top of the wheels, and a storybook. While the first 4 pages of the book emphasize engineering and creativity, by page 9 the storybook tells you to just copy the picture on the next page if you want to make the plastic dog spin. Suddenly, this toy is no more creative than a set of Legos with step-by-step instructions to build a spaceship.

The second task in the book is that all the other toys want to spin on their wheels. I would have been happier if the booklet asked my kids to try to figure it out on their own first, rather than just asking them to turn the page and copy what Goldie does. Then, the book tells you how you can spin the characters faster, and that's the end. The book offers you some additional setups of wheels, pegs and ribbon if you want to configure the spinning machine differently, but I was dearly hoping for a few physics lessons on gears, pulleys, friction and rotary forces. Could we please not dumb down the science just because my children have ovaries?

I improvised an additional assignment for my 9-year-old, who seemed to be into this toy; can you reconfigure the ribbon and wheels so you spin the characters in different directions? Yep, she figured it out in less than a minute.

I like the idea of this product, and this is a very good start for a girl-oriented engineering toy. I hope there are expansion packs in the future with additional stories, problems for the girls to solve, additional equipment (different-sized gears so they could learn differential rotary forces or rudimentary electronic components would be good) will be available soon. I think this product could be greatly improved if there were science and engineering facts and explanations in the margins for children who want to know more.

As the product stands today, it was fun for my children, but not "Wow! Where has this toy been all our lives? My kids couldn't put it down!" It's probably not worth the $30 I spent on Amazon. I chalk up the increased price to the fact that this toy does not yet have a mass distribution, and can't command lower prices.
6 helpful votes
7 helpful votes
|
0Comment|Report abuse
on January 28, 2014
I bought this for my 5 and 9 year old to work on together. My five year old saw the commercial and had to have this for Christmas. She could not wait to open it. I knew that it was a little old for her but thought that it would be fun for her and her sister to play with. In addition I really wanted to love the fact that this was a woman's company trying to get girls interested in engineering.

If this is the best that there is out there for girls to spark their interest in engineering then I feel bad for the field.

My girls played with this for about an hour - they are back to their Lego's for building and creating.

As to specific failures with the products. The pieces do not stay together in the correct manner so when the girls were trying to follow the directions and build the stuff in the books it was nearly impossible. The product is similar to lincoln logs but not as good.
4 helpful votes
5 helpful votes
|
11 comment|Report abuse
on November 25, 2013
I really wanted to love this toy, but it just doesn't do anything for me and my girls. They are 4 and 6 and play with several construction toys and science toys on a regular basis. This toy was interesting for about an hour and has barely been played with since. They are both frustrated by the crank and the little animals because they just will not stay on when spinning the machine. The crank comes off at least 3-4 times while they wind up the ribbon, even when an adult has put it on. And several animals fall of everytime they pull on the ribbon.
I give this two stars because the concept of the game is good. But since its designed so poorly, the kids are not learning anything because they don't want to play with it.
26 helpful votes
27 helpful votes
|
11 comment|Report abuse
on August 5, 2014
When I first saw the smart made commercial with the little girls and the rube goldberg contraption they made I was very impressed and thought to myself it's about time. So I quickly purchased the set for my 6 year old and was quickly disappointed. For a toy was specifically made to encourage engineering in little girls it is poorly engineered. pieces that should be loose are tight and pieces that should fit tight are loose. The little figures which are suppose to stick on rotating pieces fall off very easily and the base that the pieces fit on has an adhesive cover that peels off when the whole base should have been a solid piece. I loved the idea and concept but who ever excuted the design really did not think things through. I true shame. my daughter doesn't play with it and instead sticks with Legos, K'nex, and other creative toys. they sets should really be recalled, reworked and improved (and functioning) sets be given those who purchased them. I would have given a 1 star if not for the fact that the idea of this type of toy was great.
3 helpful votes
4 helpful votes
|
0Comment|Report abuse
on September 28, 2013
Great great idea. But still needs work! The movement is stiff and unsatisfying. The wheels don't turn easily and the more you add beyond one, the more frustrating it is. The idea that girls like to read so you give them a book to read from which they then "build" or design or engineer is good. But the reading material is stupid and intellectually insulting. I've had several girls play with this and NO ONE is impressed at all. Even if it were a $10 toy, just bleh.
8 helpful votes
9 helpful votes
|
0Comment|Report abuse
on March 9, 2017
I was happy to find this series of toys, and planned to order all of them over time. This was the first one I purchased, and it's turned out to be a disappointment:

- The pieces don't fit well together, so most of the extra designs can't be constructed in the way shown
- On the spinning machine, the axles go too far through the board and/or the blox don't connect well with the axles, so they fall off
- Axles don't stay put in wheels, as shown in alternate designs
- Axles can't be pushed all the way through blox, as shown in alternate designs
- Blox don't stay on axles, as the holes are too small to accommodate

Thankfully, I purchased this product when it was on sale -- at all $30.00-worth of use and learning. If it could do all the things shown in the booklet and more depending on creativity, it may be worth that much, but not as-is. Maybe $5.00-worth of usability as-is.

On the bright side, though, my 3-year-old loves the idea of putting pieces together and making them spin/work, so I hope to find a comparable product that can be used to that end.
1 helpful vote
|
11 comment|Report abuse

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question.
Please enter a question.
See all 35 answered questions


Need customer service? Click here